Did I make money? and get new sales on my ecommerce store? Yes.
With everything from a video, to a blog article backlink set; the service did a lot. Alas,
Was it good? Lets talk about it...
Review Copy:
Date Started: Aug 21st
Date completed: Sept 1st
Revision date completed: Sept 11th
Delivery report: xlxs file
Provided: I gave...
3 Keywords
1 URL to my site
Services received:
Google Authority Stack(G-Properties)
Web 2.0
Authority Profiles
Article Submissions
PDF Sub
Podcast/Audio sub
Video Submissions
Slides (PPT)
NAP Citations
Social Bookmarks
Business Listings
Directory Submissions
Classified Submissions
Revision Update: After having some initial issues on Sept 1st, the seller quickly and kindly made some changes to the review Copy. thank you seller. See revisions in bold.
Point #1
English and typos was an issue. Even in the report the Title "Google Authority" was miss spelled.
*Post revision: The typos were fixed in the report and the text for the relative documents also saw a significant improvement.
Point #2
The interweaving of links was good. I appreciate that the content linked to each other.
Big Point #3
The Context Is not here. Many articles talk about nature lovers in context to a Pokémon product. It refers to the product like its nature based. It's not. On the same turn the next article describes it as " a Device" when it has no device like features.
*Post revision: The lack of context its still apparent but a bit more on topic.
Point #4
If I knew the content would be written about the way it was; I would have done a link to a COLLECTION not a product. Take care when you place that you clarify your niche and give a link to a collection to help justify some of these more erroneous links.
Point #5
Spun content for sure, Spun video for certain and spun images based on keyword. They used ALOT of images showing products I don't sell. If a person clicks a image link they expect one product and instead get mine....
*Post revision: The large majority of images were updated with a few exceptions and now show my product instead. The content also read as odd instead of spun, which i see as great improvement.
Conclusion Points and Overall Review:
As a direct to site link package: Messy but Alot 5/10
As a Support package to a secondary site 7/10
*Post revision:
Uncontextual 6/10
Video and presentations unrevised
Good As a Support package to a secondary site 7/10
You ever order Chinese food, get ALOT of it, but the quality is just ok and the lady behind the counter miss heard your order and didn't (But Does*) change it after? Yeah that's this....
Post Revision: Then the Chinese restaurant fixes your order yet the food is still the food. Yeah that's this.
Finale Thoughts:
Linking this to a better article or to a collection:
This would make a nice link package to point to a collection or one that points to you tier 1 link article that looks really neat.
The articles look dirty and I personally could see google calling this out with to many of these.
*Post revision: I no longer think google would kick you out, instead it would think your site is OK quality.
My Wishes:
I wish the context always matched
I wish the sell made it clear he would be using images of products not my own. or asked me for more images to use. (this was fixed after a revision*)
I wish the video was really clean aka well written and legible, as it seems to be the focal point of the links packages.
I wish to wish the seller the best. (And thank him for the revision that really helped)
I found some really nice value here. I Couldn't* buy from them again due to fear of google banning my site.( If used as second tier booster, I would now buy from them post the revision**) But if the content is linked to a cleaner source and not the main site, perhaps yes. The seller was open and kind. I can also add how they where open to improve and eliminate errors in our DM's.
Thank you to the seller for the review and I hope his potential Buyers Do Go for it!
Its worth it.
