I'm writing this review only because service provider asked me...
PROS
All sites have installed SSL
Templates are not outdated, but they are not set to show full potential
Articles have enough words, I think at least 500 words each
URLs are hidden in report, you just get order details and partial screenshot of published URLs (not sure if this is a PRO or CON)
Report has been delivered in 5 days after order, that is good.
CONS
Design could be better, templates are good but they can be set better
There is no social accounts connected with sites
Footer is not set at all
For author name she is using some generic nick names such as LA411, and when you click on it you get nothing. It would be good to add some, at least fake name/profile to each site.
If you go to the article, it is obvious that article will not pass manual check, all is kind of messy. It has enough words, but formatting and overall appearance could be better.
Each article have 2 same images, featured is set automatically on the top, and same image is again appearing somewhere in the middle of the article
It is obvious that domains are rebuilt recently (archive is from Jan & Feb 2019), and there is a lot of room for improvement.
2 of 6 checked sites have 0 Indexed pages (probably because they still fresh) ??
2 sites (of 6 checked) are on same Class C IP
All checked articles are published on a same day
ABOUT RANKINGS & FINAL VERDICT
1 of 6 checked URLs is indexed, and 2 sites have 0 Google Indexed pages (report received 3 days ago, and all checked articles are published on Feb 07)
I don't see any ranking movements yet
In a such condition and with 50% off I would maybe use this service for Tier-2 backlinks, definitely not for Tier-1.
.
