PBN + Big Sites?

The better the PBN effect will be with the content from the archive - restore archive
This 100k site spam will be not working.

people buy sites from cnn bbc and huff - and never ask them if that sites is "neach related."

but one they hit 10$ (gonna be dead in 3 months") pbn posts, they do..

great.

Soucha said:

If you don't mind me asking, in your experience does google really treat these related post/product module links the same as direct links in the contextual body?

Click to expand...

the algo doesnt.
the discount header, footer and sidebar boiler links.

so stop "pluggin" round, and categoryising whatsoever, do correct interlinking from sites with backlinks behind them

you can get sites i competitive niches within weeks into rankings done correct.

but... let the self claimedn and "i think and I feel and google loves" interlinking experts guide you..

darulez said:

the algo doesnt.
the discount header, footer and sidebar boiler links.
you can get sites i competitive niches within weeks into rankings done correct.

Click to expand...

Thanks for yours, as well as Nargil's response.
That's what I wasn't sure, if related post/product modules were discounted similar to header/footer/sidebar links.
Typically in my experience, they are placed above the footer but under the contextual body so I wasn't sure if google put much weight to them or not.

I don't wish to derail OP's thread though and make this about me so maybe I will make my own thread with further clarification.

I makes my wonder why ppl still belive 1998 sttyle doing websits is rubbish and new fancy responsive crap bloated of amp, images and plugins would rank sites better.

99% of you affiliates site would rank better if you code them manually.
do the metas manually, do the interlinking manually.

oh, yes, this aint james gregory "i feel" "I think" I believe", and google "loves" internetporn.

it's first hand experience.

and if you still think "CMS" has no influence? this is just changing plain html > wordpress and keeping EVERY structure as perfect as possible.



there is something in that bloated CMS that kills onpage. WP was NEVER designed to be SEO or anything at all.

and concering the image, I will strip the CMS in a few days back to html. cause I need that site to be in #5 and not #15..

from onpage st andpoint, it sucks. and I would enjoy using HTML or adobe muse (I even done onpage stuff with that - it ranks perfectly) but timewise its insane.

and joomla aint an option - I dont want to deal with hacked sites on daily base...


now waiting for the "CMS dont have impact" trolls.

I'm done for today with my work, so I had some more time to spread my usual SEO is not dead rant.

darulez said:

there is something in that bloated CMS that kills onpage. WP was NEVER designed to be SEO or anything at all.

Click to expand...

I agree that WP sucks for on-page SEO, but there's one thing to note. Google reads your site's output and WP itself doesn't really output anything. Everything that you get is the output of the theme that you are running and possibly plugins.

You can create a custom theme from scratch, outputting only that which you care about. That way you retain most of the management ease of WP while maintaining "perfect" on-page SEO, whatever that may be in your case.

I did it once when I wanted to create a "perfectly silo'ed" site. The choice of niche was crap and that site is pretty much abandoned by now, but there was no bloat in the HTML that the site produced, no extra links, no stupid author, tag, category pages etc.

agree.

underscore theme doe a good job for this too.
I simply call it "fck".

that, sadly, was the only theme in all years, that came close to manual html coding or making a clean theme yourself.

smatysik said:

The better the PBN effect will be with the content from the archive - restore archive
This 100k site spam will be not working.

Click to expand...

It was related to my niche but not at all, lets say it was a car blog and now im selling car parts.

darulez said:

people buy sites from cnn bbc and huff - and never ask them if that sites is "neach related."

but one they hit 10$ (gonna be dead in 3 months") pbn posts, they do..

Click to expand...

darulez said:

the algo doesnt.
the discount header, footer and sidebar boiler links.

so stop "pluggin" round, and categoryising whatsoever, do correct interlinking from sites with backlinks behind them

you can get sites i competitive niches within weeks into rankings done correct.

but... let the self claimedn and "i think and I feel and google loves" interlinking experts guide you..

Click to expand...

I understand your post, however i wish this all could be manual, but i won't put loads ands loads of hours to an automated niche to do the interlinking section.
The only interlinking thing i did was at home.
Some social networks with nofollow - latests posts - categories buttons + 1k text with linking to some big articles of my niche - sections.
This is how i do have the "content" site at this moment.

Contact - DMCA is nofollow noindex. aff links are nofollow too.

Soucha said:

Thanks for yours, as well as Nargil's response.
That's what I wasn't sure, if related post/product modules were discounted similar to header/footer/sidebar links.
Typically in my experience, they are placed above the footer but under the contextual body so I wasn't sure if google put much weight to them or not.

I don't wish to derail OP's thread though and make this about me so maybe I will make my own thread with further clarification.

Click to expand...

great.[/QUOTE]

Look at the pic i did post up here, im using the related posts as you are saying, just before the footer but under the post content.

I dunno if i can do something more to keep the interlinking flowing.

Thanks for your replies guys!