BreaknBrix
Power Member
- Mar 25, 2014
- 778
- 4,523
Does anyone else experience that it takes forever for Google to list the site in the SERPS for the keywords? They're all indexed, but not showing for relevant keywords.
Depends on a lot of factors but sure. It can take a loong time. For instance, the first YT video I ever spam ranked took >>4 months of spamming just to show on page 1 for 1, 4 word phrase, 720 SM keyword. Then an additional 2-3 weeks to show for it's broader, 3 word phrase (4,000 SM). THEN, it took nearly a month after that to rank for 2 variations of its broader phrase. Which I didn't expect to happen at all I just kept spamming.
But that 1 video made me a good deal of money so it was worth it.
I've had other keywords rank in 2 months. Some in 3, some never rank. There's just so many factors that come into play. I just saw some dude rank for a very competitive hosting keyword using a facebook page + PBN in only 2 months.
All in all, the real goal I've learned (with spam parasites) is to just throw a bunch of shit at the wall and see what sticks. Seems on average out of every 10 campaigns (10 different niches) 2-3 will rank with ease, 3-4 will show vague improvements & I keep them live, 3-4 don't do shit and I shut it down. Also, since I'm seeing dudes ranking FB pages real fast with PBN links that's something I plan on testing very soon. I'm in the process of building out a PBN myself. But I'm digging deep through these guys networks and noticing some super shitty, but very efficient marketing. Like all PBN sites 3 pages deep, duplicate content everywhere, interlinking between the PBN, footprints everywhere... meanwhile that PBN is keeping 2 FB pages, 2 .coms and 1 .org all in the top 4 of Googe. For keywords that could easily make $500-$1000 / day.
This is why I gotta get my PBN skills in order. If some idiot can rank a 40k month buyer keyword with 94 links from 30 something shitty PBN sites (just 1/5 of the platforms he's ranking) I'm sure I can do better. I know I can do better. Just a matter of technicalities at this point.
-BB
Last edited: