authorityjourney
Regular Member
- May 22, 2016
- 304
- 101
Hi , Can you use Bing Traductor it's way better than google traductor
new Russian technology
- Thread starter tar729
- Start date
-
- Tags
- seo transistors
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
all that connects me to the Bing acquaintance and correspondence on professional matters with their top-end developer Denis by Raskovalova, which head hunting from Yandex a couple of years ago.
Don't like Bing
Then someone promised to translate the text and never translated for some reason. But the information is extremely interesting. Many consider it science fiction, but let it be on their conscience
I don't hope for a full understanding people should understand that.
authorityjourney
Regular Member
- May 22, 2016
- 304
- 101
all that connects me to the Bing acquaintance and correspondence on professional matters with their top-end developer Denis by Raskovalova, which head hunting from Yandex a couple of years ago.
Don't like Bing
Then someone promised to translate the text and never translated for some reason. But the information is extremely interesting. Many consider it science fiction, but let it be on their conscience
PLEASE USE BING TRANSLATOR
Bargain Boss
Junior Member
- Apr 6, 2016
- 131
- 68
I used Google Translate to read this. Here is my guess.
To rank higher in search engines, make sure you use:
1) Relevant anchor texts (on your satellite sites) with keywords that are related to your main keyword.
2) Relevant content on the money site.
You said you are one of the top 5 SEO expert in Russia. So what is the name of the tool to measure the relevance (weight) of the links? Any demo of this tool?
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
allthatconnects mewithbingis an acquaintanceand correspondenceon professional matterswith theirhigh enddeveloperDenisRaskovalovym, whoseheadhuntingofYandex, a couple of years ago.
Don't like Bing
Heresomeonepromised totranslatetextand nevertranslatedit.Andextremelyinteresting. Many consider her fiction, but let it be on their conscience
I didn't hope for a full understanding of Who shouldheunderstand.so better? allstick together. Bing bing such
D
Deleted member 719276
Guest
I can finally understand you !allthatconnects mewithbingis an acquaintanceand correspondenceon professional matterswith theirhigh enddeveloperDenisRaskovalovym, whoseheadhuntingofYandex, a couple of years ago.
Don't like Bing
Heresomeonepromised totranslatetextand nevertranslatedit.Andextremelyinteresting. Many consider her fiction, but let it be on their conscience
so better? allstick together. Bing bing such
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
service Russian-speaking, and measures the weight of links only Russian links. My team only thinks over the question of the expansion of the English-language market.
weight measurement
the definition of spam links
It's 2 different algorithm
the video shows the functionality of the verification of purchased options exchange Sapa. The test batch is to belong to seo links.
- Check the weight in the interface is too simple. So we did some video.
the output looks like this: http://joxi.ru/zANaRooCNKl729
the service has a special functionality for creating the semantic kernels for making seo transistors. It can work with English-language queries.
There's nothing I want to sell again. I want to show how it works in our market.
authorityjourney
Regular Member
- May 22, 2016
- 304
- 101
I CAN UNDERSTAND YOU , DID YOU USE BING TRANSLATOR?
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
Yes,Bing
"... WhyGoogleremoved thePage Rankand whywe cannot trustPADA/TF/CF
Actually,Google andsaidwhyhedid it:"PRceased to reflectthe reality of the situation."It is true,but not all.The fact of the matter is thatPRhas a relationshipwith the quality ofthe page is notcomprehensiveandis the onlymetricof itsreferenceandtrafikovojpopularity. "
allcorrectly?
so in my even funnier
This is your goal seem to be
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
it is strange that you are trying to accuse me that I'm not guilty...
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
DA/PA/CF/TF is an outdated system, instead of actually valuing the 'strength' of a website or a link, as they claim on their website, it actually only measures the authority. You see, that really doesn't matter as much as other things, that's what I've been trying to tell you. There are other far more important factors that me and my team have discovered, I personally worked under Index and I know how algorithms work. Not precisely, but we found out a long time ago that Yandex.and Google are somewhat alike in their algorithm.
Basically DA/PA/CF/TF, we have that shit in Russia. We've been through everything and even further than you. We've had patches that banned millions of websites that were specifically made to create spammy links.
You guys got shit like GSA, that we had as well, it gets you now instantly banned on Yandex.
What I am basically trying to say is
1) PA/DA/TF/CF don't measure links properly in most cases. The margin of error here is over 400%. PA/DA/TF/CF is useful for comparing websites and how they will rank, but only assuming all the links are the same and the websites are the same, but then they would have the same PA/DA/TF/CF wouldn't they?
2) The keyword of the website of a backlink can be really the same as yours, but doesn't mean it will be related. And Google sees that, just like Yandex, they categorise websites, that's what they do. Basically one of the biggest errors of the PA/DA/CF/TF system you guys use is that you really believe that it matters How can it matter if a link is going to pass on 0% of that?
3) Google uses other stats as well, for example if a backlink on a high PA page won't get any clicks, Google will see that and consider it just as useless as a low PA link.
4) There is a logical bug in algorithms, without it they cannot function. You can exploit it and it's called SEO transistor in Russian, because it amplifies link power, except it doesn't reduce anything else.
5) Trust matters a lot and it also plays a big role in ranking, actually I'd say there are two types of links, trust and power. Me and my team have developed over years a system that can measure both.
6) You can have 3 SEO links with a PA of 10 and 3 normal links with a PA of 90, guess who's going to win. You already all know the answer, some link in some shitty unrelated newspapers won't rank you, even if it's related, but the link is hidden and nobody is going to be interested in it.
Basically DA/PA/CF/TF, we have that shit in Russia. We've been through everything and even further than you. We've had patches that banned millions of websites that were specifically made to create spammy links.
You guys got shit like GSA, that we had as well, it gets you now instantly banned on Yandex.
What I am basically trying to say is
1) PA/DA/TF/CF don't measure links properly in most cases. The margin of error here is over 400%. PA/DA/TF/CF is useful for comparing websites and how they will rank, but only assuming all the links are the same and the websites are the same, but then they would have the same PA/DA/TF/CF wouldn't they?
2) The keyword of the website of a backlink can be really the same as yours, but doesn't mean it will be related. And Google sees that, just like Yandex, they categorise websites, that's what they do. Basically one of the biggest errors of the PA/DA/CF/TF system you guys use is that you really believe that it matters How can it matter if a link is going to pass on 0% of that?
3) Google uses other stats as well, for example if a backlink on a high PA page won't get any clicks, Google will see that and consider it just as useless as a low PA link.
4) There is a logical bug in algorithms, without it they cannot function. You can exploit it and it's called SEO transistor in Russian, because it amplifies link power, except it doesn't reduce anything else.
5) Trust matters a lot and it also plays a big role in ranking, actually I'd say there are two types of links, trust and power. Me and my team have developed over years a system that can measure both.
6) You can have 3 SEO links with a PA of 10 and 3 normal links with a PA of 90, guess who's going to win. You already all know the answer, some link in some shitty unrelated newspapers won't rank you, even if it's related, but the link is hidden and nobody is going to be interested in it.
OP - I have moved this from the White Hat SEO (does not belong there, no hope) section to the lounge for obvious reasons.
Please quit spamming multiple posts in a row, calm yourself down or I'll start dishing out infractions..
Please quit spamming multiple posts in a row, calm yourself down or I'll start dishing out infractions..
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
Well, because I am a specialist of algorithms. I sell my service, I don't run some YouTube blog. How do you imagine me ranking myself on YouTube? Make videos of cats and rank them there? I sell my services to a limited amount of people because it's a quality product, those kind of people don't care whether I rank myself or not on YouTube. They care about my report of which links should they build and which should they disavow. Which links make hem waste their money and which links make it enough to be able to waste it.
The videos are BTW specifically made for my group to explain to people how detailed SEO actually works. And that one link can defeat thousands.
Capo Dei Capi
BANNED
- Oct 23, 2014
- 752
- 7,253
is he Gorka trolling?
D