new Russian technology

I will not believe you until you show successful sites on the goggle and yandex.

It would seem nonsense to others, and bring you the bad things.

The latest system of Google is only made by them, and no one knows, recipe on it. Unless you work on them
 
So can we buy this? It is difficult to understand what you mean. Are you trying to help us or what?
 
скинул тебе запрос на скайп, ответь имя mike gilbert
 
I will not believe you until you show successful sites on the goggle and yandex.

It would seem nonsense to others, and bring you the bad things.

The latest system of Google is only made by them, and no one knows, recipe on it. Unless you work on them
your wishes for the case studies in Yandex I satisfied.
Under Google I have no separate cases. I didn't do them on purpose. I only see that under Google it works too. I JUST first time have declared themselves on this forum and in the English speaking Internet. No need to rush.
I don't need you to believe me. My goal is to say that I am and have these technologies. To begin with.
I came to tell you that it is necessary to measure the weight of links. I came to tell you that there are seo transistors. nothing more.
if you need to show interest, eventually all will be. And while I have what I already have. This is not enough.
 
So can we buy this? It is difficult to understand what you mean. Are you trying to help us or what?
I don't want you to sell anything. I need you to just know about technology.
 
What you are speaking about is more the principles of marketing. When applied online, i see how the mention 3 node advertising platform works. But i would not consider it new technology. Shalin developed these ideas, but i guess its still russian. maybe i am missing the point. has there been some new addition to his ideas?
 
it's not the holes in the algorithms. this is a fundamental unchangeable basis of ranking. They are the same for Yandex and for Google.
I know the difference with Yandex from Google the intricacies. I'm a professional. And if what you said were true, Yahoo would have lost to Google in Russia.
You are wrong. In some parts of the algorithm Yandex cooler Google in 3-4 times. And Google to Yandex is still far in this respect.
I did not accidentally said that we have those who work under Google's downshifters in seo. or do you think I'm lying? :)
unfortunately, this is reality.
Tar I don't want to start discussion who is better and which Search Engine what have(all or parts from Algorithms).
To not carry away from the topic with so called транзистор.This is pure Black Hat on eyes on Google and all members don't carried away If you want to apply such SEO technique.I'm from Macedonia.Why I'm telling this will be clear to you below.
Yandex don't have the same algorithms as Google this i can prove in latest 2 years research and practicing and developing Search engines just to crack Google and we succeed it.We done this to all Search Engines.
Hope moderators will not be made to me if the think I break some rule erase the link because I'm showing this as example.
Some of us here aren't just for money but seek better approach,idea or hint or look what is going on on scientific Social Level.
Upon this researches we had and tested Google,Yandex,Bing and Baidu.
Upon these test and practice today is formed SGM ProTLD as part of ProTLD Network.
Domain name is http://www.seo-google-method.host I show this as example.
I will not explain what kind network is this google it ,not yandex it no offence.
One of the main products is SEO-Pure organic SEO for Google and Bing which Bring you more money in one word.
This is final goal of the company but not ours also.
There are 2 differences from Google trough Bing to Yandex.
Yandex is similar to Baidu and its algorithms but with Google No.
Maybe crawling yes and approach to discover links and web site but Algorithms who are purely for Content No which is factor for ranking and from where all starts Content. Whiteout content there is nothing to be crawled and ranked.
Why?
Language.
They use local language.
For example Google use English-Latin at is on purest version and day by day they I mean about Google Inc put Grand efforts to bring English to the perfection.They invest a lot in this field especially in Wikipedia and defining the words .
Google knows English well and on "one meaning of some sentences" on English there are at most 2-3 variation you can use ,and that all.
One published content on Google will rank only Unique Content and this Google recognize as Unique.
All others what you do,go up side down on your head you can spun the content at most 60-70% uniqueness and Google will recognize as Spam and will Penalized you without exceptions.
This will be answer to all on the forum when say I have web site with few articles and I don't rank even you put back links.There is content issue.
But when it comes to Yandex because we use Cyrillic from semantic view we can express one word or sentence in more ways 10-20 times more.
This means from one article you can get 20 unique articles.But this will work only on Yandex and Baidu.
Compare Google 2-3,Yandex 10-20.
Hope in short way its clear and stay away from Tranzistor System.
 
I want to learn more about your method, tar729.

I have some questions:
1) From the image in your first post, is Site No.1 the information website?
2) Is Site No.2 the commercial website?
3) What are the recommended types of sites for YB2? Are they Web 2.0 sites or private blog network (PBN) sites?
4) Any examples of the YB2 sites?
5) Do all of the 3 sites (No.1, No.2 and No.3) use the same types of YB2 sites?
6) Does Site No.3 use the same keywords as Sites No.1 and No.2?
7) You said Sites No.1 and No.2 have the same keyword in the titles. But you said that 1 website has an information keyword and the other website has a commercial keyword. Can you give examples of an information keyword and a commercial keyword for Sites No.1 and No.2?
8) Do you host Sites No.1 and No.2 on different hosting just like PBN?
9) If Site No.2 is a commercial website, isn't it considered a money site too?
10) What is the weight of the links that you mention? Is it PR? Or DA/PA? Or TF/CF?

Thank you for taking the time to teach us and to translate for us. I know it is difficult.
I then decide with the interpreter, so that all questions will be answered later. and what kind of trash with this Google translate.
 
What you are speaking about is more the principles of marketing. When applied online, i see how the mention 3 node advertising platform works. But i would not consider it new technology. Shalin developed these ideas, but i guess its still russian. maybe i am missing the point. has there been some new addition to his ideas?
this technology has nothing to do with that of which you speak. Let's discuss later. interpreter in a way.
 
So can we buy this? It is difficult to understand what you mean. Are you trying to help us or what?
let's have the interpreter will be. what I'm tired already and don't see what is not said.
 
Tar I don't want to start discussion who is better and which Search Engine what have(all or parts from Algorithms).
To not carry away from the topic with so called транзистор.This is pure Black Hat on eyes on Google and all members don't carried away If you want to apply such SEO technique.I'm from Macedonia.Why I'm telling this will be clear to you below.
Yandex don't have the same algorithms as Google this i can prove in latest 2 years research and practicing and developing Search engines just to crack Google and we succeed it.We done this to all Search Engines.
Hope moderators will not be made to me if the think I break some rule erase the link because I'm showing this as example.
Some of us here aren't just for money but seek better approach,idea or hint or look what is going on on scientific Social Level.
Upon this researches we had and tested Google,Yandex,Bing and Baidu.
Upon these test and practice today is formed SGM ProTLD as part of ProTLD Network.
Domain name is seo-google-method.host I show this as example.
I will not explain what kind network is this google it ,not yandex it no offence.
One of the main products is SEO-Pure organic SEO for Google and Bing which Bring you more money in one word.
This is final goal of the company but not ours also.
There are 2 differences from Google trough Bing to Yandex.
Yandex is similar to Baidu and its algorithms but with Google No.
Maybe crawling yes and approach to discover links and web site but Algorithms who are purely for Content No which is factor for ranking and from where all starts Content. Whiteout content there is nothing to be crawled and ranked.
Why?
Language.
They use local language.
For example Google use English-Latin at is on purest version and day by day they I mean about Google Inc put Grand efforts to bring English to the perfection.They invest a lot in this field especially in Wikipedia and defining the words .
Google knows English well and on "one meaning of some sentences" on English there are at most 2-3 variation you can use ,and that all.
One published content on Google will rank only Unique Content and this Google recognize as Unique.
All others what you do,go up side down on your head you can spun the content at most 60-70% uniqueness and Google will recognize as Spam and will Penalized you without exceptions.
This will be answer to all on the forum when say I have web site with few articles and I don't rank even you put back links.There is content issue.
But when it comes to Yandex because we use Cyrillic from semantic view we can express one word or sentence in more ways 10-20 times more.
This means from one article you can get 20 unique articles.But this will work only on Yandex and Baidu.
Compare Google 2-3,Yandex 10-20.
Hope in short way its clear and stay away from Tranzistor System.
you are obviously about something else..
 
I want to learn more about your method, tar729.

I have some questions:
1) From the image in your first post, is Site No.1 the information website?
2) Is Site No.2 the commercial website?
3) What are the recommended types of sites for YB2? Are they Web 2.0 sites or private blog network (PBN) sites?
4) Any examples of the YB2 sites?
5) Do all of the 3 sites (No.1, No.2 and No.3) use the same types of YB2 sites?
6) Does Site No.3 use the same keywords as Sites No.1 and No.2?
7) You said Sites No.1 and No.2 have the same keyword in the titles. But you said that 1 website has an information keyword and the other website has a commercial keyword. Can you give examples of an information keyword and a commercial keyword for Sites No.1 and No.2?
8) Do you host Sites No.1 and No.2 on different hosting just like PBN?
9) If Site No.2 is a commercial website, isn't it considered a money site too?
10) What is the weight of the links that you mention? Is it PR? Or DA/PA? Or TF/CF?

Thank you for taking the time to teach us and to translate for us. I know it is difficult.
1) yes
2) yes
3) Web 2.0
5) site 3 may be of any type
6) yes
7)
http://BURENIESKVAZHINDESHEVO.RU
http://BURENIESKVAZHINNEDOROGO.RU
8) yes
10) The weight of the link is a quality feature links. It shows the extent of its usefulness to the availability of the donor for the person who goes through it. This includes the usefulness of the information obtained on the acceptor.
The metrics you use PR? Or DA/PA? Or TF/CF?
in fact, do not represent the measure of utility of the link and measure the useful information acquired in the acceptor.
The measure of this usefulness is the true weight of the links and it has a numerical value in the range 0-30000 units.
Your mistake is that you look at the quality of the donor, and the semantic component semantic links - don't look.
In fact, the link values are null, PR DA/PA can be hundreds of times greater than the large value PR DA/PA
You are cheating yourself and the used metrics are not related to the weight of the links. We have people fooled for a long time :) we also Have our own analogues PR DA/PA :) But we already knew it was a massive hoax. You have yet to understand it.
 
Wow. Each post made less sense to me than me the previous one. I'm out. It sounded interesting .
you can ask anything and it will be interesting
 
I tried reading this and other replies, but am yet to understand anything here expect SEO transistor.
Any one solved this puzzle yet?
 
In fact, the link values are null, PR DA/PA can be hundreds of times greater than the large value PR DA/PA

Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions. Please thank your translator for me too.

I still don't understand about what you say above. Please explain. Thanks.
 
Back
Top