Never See A Fat Doctor (Rant)

I once argued with a doctor about being fat.

He was stating that a fat person can be healthy. I on the other hand was coming from the position that being fat..is unhealthy. To me it is impossible to say you are healthy if you are fat.

People like to use the term "healthy" to be "without a virus or disease", when in fact..it is a level of your quality of health.


A fat doctor is not a good doctor. I mean, would you trust buying your steak dinner from Peta??
 
Next you you see him, apologise to him, but explain to him calmly the reasons you reacted the way do did. I am guessing the ''mood' effects of the hypertension medication have a huge impact on you (in light of your background and the other meds you take) and that makes it harder to handle them. If that's the case, explain that to him.


I think you'll find if you are a little conciliatory with him and open up a touch, he will become much more receptive to you. Having him onside will be much better than battling with him.


You said the side effects of the hypertension medication are horrendous - it sounds like some of those effects could be down to the meds interacting with and reducing the effects of the Suboxone (mood and energy wise). But that can be managed.


And you also said that after 3 days the effects are so dire you quit them completely. You may find that slowly increasing the dose, or just gritting it out, means your body gets used to it and the side-effects lessen.


I worked in the nursing/psychiatric field many years ago and administering drugs was a minefield of contraindications and interactions - I used to get a new copy of the BNF (British National Formulary) every year as it was constantly being updated.


All drugs have contraindications, but they also interact with hundreds of other drugs. Suboxone for example, interacts with over 500 and in a couple of minutes I found two interactions with heart or blood pressure medications (nicardipine or quinidine) - there are certainly going to be others.


But the only way to figure it out properly is for you and your doctor to work together on it.


And as far as your doctor being overweight - that in no way makes him any less of a doctor. But you know that anyway. You never know, if you work things out with him you may even be able to give him a few pointers on how to get himself in better shape (because that's an area you clearly have expertise in).


Good luck with it, but I'm sure you'll get it sorted out.

Thanks a lot man. I had no idea suboxone interacts with that many medicines so it's something I definitely gotta check out.


I have no idea about medicine, so whether what the doc said was the right treatment or not, I couldn't tell.


That said, the doc handled it right and you wrong. You are paying HIM for treatment, not the other way around. His treatment says "A, B and C". If you don't follow his treatment (which you have every right not to, of course), he has the responsibility to fire you as a client.


Edit: When you go to a restaurant, you ask the owner why he's not fat and claim that ergo his food must suck?

Not sure how you came to that conclusion. I'm *paying him* for treatment just like you said. And when a doctor tells me "I'm not gonna collaborate with you" that begs the question "why are you even a doctor"? Aren't doctors suppose to ask questions, get feedback, run tests, etc rather than play psychic and say shit like "you're gonna die in your early 50's"? or worse, "I know this is a genetic problem and changing your lifestyle won't fix it"? All this guy ever does is test my blood pressure and weigh me when I go in. It genuinely scares me that in the last 18 months... not one time has this guy drug tested me. Not even on our first visit! A sub doctor is always suppose to drug test new patients. It's called the "initial assessment". If someone comes into your office on benzos, and you skip that test than give them sub they can kill themselves.

Not once has he done a blood test, hormones, gene panel test... he keeps wrapping that stupid balloon around my arm then spins a wheel in his head like this is wheel a fortune, it lands on some new random med and he just writes a new script.

Also, the weight thing is most definitely an issue. Anyone who says it's not then answer 1 simple question. If a doctor can't take care of or manage his own health... then how the hell is he suppose to manage a case load of 50-100 patients?


Sorry if this is off topic but I didn't read the OP as it's too long for the time I have available. Since we're talking of Doctors here I just wanted to throw in my 2 cents.


I do not believe in Doctors, I am sure there are those that are genuine but most so called Doctors are nothing more than a live encyclopaedia of information and sometimes not even that, especially here in the UK where when you visit your local GP they will start searching the web. Sometimes you might even get print outs as a bonus.


Unfortunately most Doctors, at least here, do not diagnose you properly they do not look at things from a perspective that requires the whole picture. Your body isn't a bunch of separate systems, it is a bunch of interdependent systems that work together as a whole. In my opinion in order to successfully cure/treat most of our problems Doctors need to do much more than just symptom questioning. Unfortunately the health system is such a mess that it will probably be a long time before our health is actually treated the way it should be treated. Not to forget all of the crap that we get in our food.


I'm not trying to say that Doctors are bad or that they're not trying to help you, they are, it's just that most of them do not think much for themselves or they're limited in terms of what they're allowed to do. They take information in for granted. Not enough people question why what how things work.

100% agree with this. If I had to guess... I've probably seen over 30 different doctors in my life. I can only think of 2 doctors who I'd consider "real doctors".

1) The doctor my dad sees. He's quite literally saved his life on 2 occasions. The first time he found a 98% blockage in my fathers heart, he had triple by pass surgery and if it weren't for that surgery he would have had a massive heart attack and died at least 10 years ago. 2nd time this doctor found a blood clot in my dads neck with >>HIS HANDS. He had to confirm it was a clot and of course it was. Then my dad had surgery and sure enough the surgeon said "if this clot wasn't removed in the next 6-12 months your father would have had a stroke".

One thing that's interesting about this doctor, he's around 72. A very old, skinny & energetic man. But he's very oldschool. He will use a BP test, EKG's, all the latest technology, etc but every single visit he still taps your knees to check reflexes. That's something I see very few dr's doing these days. And he'll spend at least 30 minutes checking blood vessels / arteries with his hands. He also approaches problems from a holistic standpoint. Like with my dad, although he had to put him on medicines he went above and beyond to get my dads weight down more than 80lbs. He got his blood sugar down. Fact is, my dad would not be alive right now if it wasn't for this man. It just sucks that I can't see him cause he's not licensed to prescribe suboxone.

2) The dr I saw in Brooklyn. I already talked about him in the OP so I won't say anything else.

Aside from those 2, the rest of the dr's I've seen have been you're run of the mill > take weight > take blood pressure > make some small talk > get the pill pad out > next patient.


@OP


To your post you are on the right way.Dont take to much medecine since it will get your body toxic and you will have more issues.Eat healthy (most important) organic food ......make some sport and a detox and you will see it will go upwords.The body is a complex which is being created to heal itself if you provide the right prerequisites

Thanks. That's 1 thing I've always worried about is I don't eat organic veggies and certain foods feel disgusting. Like the cucumbers I buy from Shoprite, they come with this greasy, wax coating that is IMPOSSIBLE to remove. Last week I got a batch that was so greasy, I used AJAX dish washing soap to get the coating off, I rinsed off the soap, felt the outside of the cucumber and they still felt like tape. I don't know wtf that shit is they put on some of these foods but if soap can't remove it, I can't imagine what it's doing to your insides.


BB, don't you have any methadone clinics where you are? They have suboxone too for certain people. They give it once a week and it's free.

Thanks for the response and YES we do!

The way it works in our state is they give you methadone 1 year for free. But after that point you have to pay for it or get off, and there are MANY downsides to being on methadone.

1) The visits / pickups/ rules are way more stringent. I think for the first few months you have to drive to the clinic TWICE A DAY just to get your morning and afternoon dose. Then after a certain point 3 months or something they allow you take home a 1 week supply. So that's 4 visits a month. The closest methadone clinic to me is about a 40 minute drive and there's just no way I could do that much driving.

2) Methadone itself.... it's a horrible drug to give to opiate addicts. Why? Cause it's a *full agonist* opiate that gets you high same way heroin, oxycodone, morphine or poppy seed tea would. I've seen people on methadone. They knod out from their doses same way you would on heroin. It's massively sedating. Psychologically it's very addictive, and since it doesn't block opiates like suboxone does, like half of all methadone patients are taking heroin or some other opiate WITH their methadone.

I like suboxone cause it doesn't get you high (it doesn't get opiate addicts high but it will get a normal person high if you have no tolerance to opiates). You can't take opiates while you're on suboxone cause it blocks their effects. It has a slightly stimulating effect so I don't feel doped up all day. I just feel a bit energetic, happy, and motivated to do things. Suboxone for me has been a live saver. It keeps me the hell away from opiates. At the same time, withdrawals from the drug are worse than heroin and last for months. So as much as I'd love to get off, it's extremely difficult. I've tried before and usually within a week I'm suicidal, no sleep for months, RLS, depression, anxiety, vomiting, hot flashes, cold flashes, panic attacks, pain all over your body etc. I may be on this shit the rest of my life. I don't want to be. And I am going to try getting off sub again... but to be successful, I would need to take a 3-6 month vacation from life. And right now that's just not possible.



get well! driving 4 hours doesn't seems to be that bad in this situation

Haha. Thanks. I should have said "4 hours on a good day". A lot of times driving to NY I'll hit traffic, and sometimes it's taken me 6-7 hours just to take the trip. Plus I am NOT a good driver at all. Even though I saw that dr for about 3 years I would still get lost WITH a GPS coming home from the city. One day my GPS broke, I spent 2 hours driving around the city frantically / losing my mind. Then I had to call my brother who stayed with me on the phone for an hour using Google Earth to tell me how to get back home lol.

I know there are people who commute every day from NJ to NY but once I get into the city, I feel like I'm on an acid trip. There are so many roads and so many cars going in so many different directions I have no idea how people do it. Although... getting a 2nd, backup GPS might be a smart idea. My TomTom is fairly old. :)


OP: Doc is allowed to do whatever he wants to do. You're his client and if he doesn't want to treat you that's his choice. And you're a bitter asshole as much or more than he is. It was not him who walked into your office but the other way around. He wants to make money off your back? And what?! Everybody does. Unless you speak to at least 2 other doctors and they tell you this doc's professional advice was wrong, misleading or malicious, you're simply wrong about this. And whether he is fat or ugly or an asshole is irrelevant.
.

I said he was "severely obese" as in morbidly obese as in huffs and puffs when he walks into the room. I know I used the word "fat" in the title but lets stop mixing up fat with what he really is, which is morbidly obese.

And if you're telling me that doesn't matter, you're telling me you'd have no issue / reservations about seeing a dentist with brown, rotting farmers teeth... which we all know is bs so lets some pretending that weight doesn't matter.

Secondly. As I've said, I've seen enough doctors in my life to establish a frame of reference of what's right and wrong. You don't even need that frame of reference or a PHD to know this guy is talking out of his ass. All you need is common sense. He's never asked to do blood work, never asked to do a gene panel screening, never asked to test my hormones and NEVER asked me to lower my salt intake or caffeine consumption. The most he's said in regard to smoking is "I can prescribe you wellbutrin which will make the cigs taste like metal" but he never directly said "you need or should stop smoking". This is a >>>DOCTOR.

I'm not saying I'm perfect and that I know it all. I'm not even saying this is a "right or wrong" issue. What I'm saying is he IS a bad doctor. He's lazy as hell. Never want's to think outside the box. It's always about the pen and the pad. "I write this, you take it, end of story". That's not medicine, that's business. You can say "medicine is business" but I know by the way he runs his practice, by the way he treats his patients, the only thing he cares about is $$$. Get your patients back. Write them as many scripts as possible. Fail to do proper evaluations. Fail to experiment with different approaches. He's rude as shit. I've never met a doctor who will leave the room every single time someone calls. His secretary never says "can you wait? he's with a patient right now." He leaves the room in the middle of any visit, will sit his fat ass down in his office talking carelessly about random shit for 20 minutes then comes back like it was no big deal.

He does this shit all the time and it's rude as hell. Tell your f#cking patients to hold or call back CAUSE YOU'RE SEEING A PATIENT. If you can't do that, at least RUSH THE CALL. He can't even do that. He goes on talking about shit that's completely irrelevant to the phone call. Like "how's your son doing? oh he's playing hockey now! that's nice... how about the wife"? Meanwhile I'm sitting in the room thinking "I wanna punch this fat fucker in the face".



Sounds like you've had a hard time of it BB. From my point of view i.e. a BMS and a Clinical Pharmacologist, taking BP meds that are causing these side effects in you is a complete no go. For him to suggest it's a genetic trait that's causing the elevated BP without actually taking the time to do a gene panel on you is a bloody farce as well. A similar situation was with my mum taking meds for her thyroid that made her vomit (sorry if anyone is eating when they read this) so much that she was left severely dehyrdated. It ended up that the doctor bollocked at both of us to get out of the room when he knew he was in the wrong. A week later she seen another doctor who incidentally I ended up working alongside for over a year and he prescribed her a tweaked formulation. It's very much about who you see, especially in the NHS.


Out of interest, did he try you on any beta blockers like propranolol and bisporolol? There's some evidence to suggest that they may cause a slight increase in the risk of Type 2 Diabetes but they are generally more well tolerated than the ARB's that you've been put on, plus they're pretty cheap as well.


Nifedipine would also be an option, but it can cause some pretty horrendous headaches in people as well.

Thanks for the advice! I'm about to write a list of all the meds he's prescribed me and atenlenol was one of them... which I believe is a beta-blocker. That drug specifically gave me migraine like headaches and horrible insomnia. I was popping ibuprofens that weren't doing anything and didn't sleep or workout for 3 days straight. So eventually I just said "screw this" and flushed them down the toilet.

I've also taking inderal / propranolol and get very little to no side effects (which is weird cause it's also a beta-blocker) ... only problem is it doesn't actually lower my BP. It does make me feel very calm and relaxed, my breathing slows down, but my actually numbers never drop.

Here is the list of meds I've been prescribed -

1) Losartan / Cozaar - This actually DID drop my numbers but it made me extremely lethargic, tired, muscle weakness, couldn't lift, couldn't run, couldn't get stuff done so I couldn't take it.

2) Atenolol - Gave me excruciating headaches like I said. Felt like someone was blowing up a balloon in the back of my head and I'd pound my head all day like a monkey.

3) Dyazide - Made me very dizzy, got vertigo, when I'd bend over it felt like the world was spinning. Made me loopy and disorganized. Plus I'd wake up 2-3 times during the night just to pee (from what I understand this med acts like a diuretic).

4) Toprol - Never did anything. No side effects but it also didn't drop my BP. We tried raising the dose and it was the same story.

5) Bystolic - This crap felt like poison. I'd get aches in my joints and muscles. But the worst part was the chest pain. I got this pain in my chest anytime I took a deep breath. And I'd pound on my chest to try and make it go away. If I went for a run, forget it, I felt like I was having a heart attack. I got very scared from the chest pain so I immediately stopped taking it.

6) Clonidine - Was given 100mcg / day during a hypertensive crisis for about 4 weeks straight then tapered off. This stuff worked like a charm. Down side is it felt a bit like valium. It made me very tired in a calm, relaxed, doped up sort of way. It also made me feel a bit groggy in the morning but it was honestly no big deal. The only reason I didn't take it long term is he said "you're not suppose to take clonidine long term". Which I'm still not sure if that's true or not.

7) Inderal - One of the better meds I took. And I still keep a supply in my home for giving speeches. It makes me feel extremely calm. Slows my breathing. I get no physical signs of anxiety in public (racing heart, sweaty hands, shaking, trembling, etc). And I get very few side effects at all. I honestly wish this med worked but unfortunately, it will not bring down my numbers. Even if I go up to 80mg my #'s maintain in stage 2 hypertension.

8 & 9.... I can't remember. But I do have them written down somewhere in my medical journal.

10 will be the Volsartan... which as far as I know is a sister of Losartan aka Cozaar. So I'm expecting unbearable side effects with that as well. I'm yet to actually fill the script but we'll see how it goes.

In the meantime I've set up an order for suboxone and clonidine online. I'm going to keep the sub as a back up for emergency and the clonidine I may use to manipulate my numbers for our next visit. I may honestly just tell the doctor "the volsartans working great!" meanwhile I'll just pop 1 clonidine every month before I go in. And I'll also keep them encase of another hypertensive crisis.

If he wants to get manipulative and controlling with me, we'll see who can control who. This will buy me a few more months to find a PROPER doctor then hopefully by then I can sort things out the right way... whichever way that is.

-BB
 
Last edited:
BB, I've got one question, how long did it take you to write and post all of the above?
 
1) The visits / pickups/ rules are way more stringent. I think for the first few months you have to drive to the clinic TWICE A DAY just to get your morning and afternoon dose. Then after a certain point 3 months or something they allow you take home a 1 week supply. So that's 4 visits a month. The closest methadone clinic to me is about a 40 minute drive and there's just no way I could do that much driving.

Oh heck. That's too far. We have the clinics all over the place in my state. Would they make you go twice a day even if you have been getting them from the doctor? It doesn't hurt to call and ask.
 
Not sure how you came to that conclusion. I'm *paying him* for treatment just like you said. And when a doctor tells me "I'm not gonna collaborate with you" that begs the question "why are you even a doctor"? Aren't doctors suppose to ask questions, get feedback, run tests, etc rather than play psychic and say shit like "you're gonna die in your early 50's"? or worse, "I know this is a genetic problem and changing your lifestyle won't fix it"? All this guy ever does is test my blood pressure and weigh me when I go in. It genuinely scares me that in the last 18 months... not one time has this guy drug tested me. Not even on our first visit! A sub doctor is always suppose to drug test new patients. It's called the "initial assessment". If someone comes into your office on benzos, and you skip that test than give them sub they can kill themselves.

Not once has he done a blood test, hormones, gene panel test... he keeps wrapping that stupid balloon around my arm then spins a wheel in his head like this is wheel a fortune, it lands on some new random med and he just writes a new script.

Also, the weight thing is most definitely an issue. Anyone who says it's not then answer 1 simple question. If a doctor can't take care of or manage his own health... then how the hell is he suppose to manage a case load of 50-100 patients?

It's pretty simple really.

You are paying someone for a service. He either delivers a service you like or he doesn't. When he doesn't you go somewhere else or you sue (if there's a legal claim). He on his end, has the right to decide what he will deliver. He has the right to fire you as a client. You don't get to decide what kind of job he delivers.

As for the weight thing, that's his problem, and unless he asked you to to solve it, it's none of your business. Don't think he can treat you well? Pay a different doctor. Doesn't get much easier.

And pray tell, why are you 18 months with a doctor who supposedly sucks? He was ok when he was prescribing the drugs you wanted and now suddenly that he doesn't want to play along anymore, he sucks?
 
@OP I get it you don't like the guy. Maybe he's even a horrible doctor as you say. My point is, his weight is not really an indicator of how well he can treat you just how a dentists fucked up teeth are not an indicator that he's unskilled or a bad dentist but simply that he doesn't give a fuck about his teeth. All doctors know smoking is bad, but some doctors smoke. Should we consider them bad doctors because they smoke even though they know better?

Ok, he's a shitty doctor. So why do you stay with him? Move on, go find another one. Not all people are nice people. Not all doctors are equally skilled, or caring or empathic. Yeah maybe some are more about the biz/money than about helping people. And what? That's their decision. If you expect to ever be able to put your life/future/whatever in another person's hands and trust him with it, you're out of your mind. Not even your wife, mother or children are able to know what's best for you. With most people you can't even demand them not to want to harm you on purpose, because some might just want to do that for whatever reason. So yeah, life sucks, you need to decide yourself, based on whatever you feel like, including based on gut feeling. So decide and move on. Putting so much energy into hurting the guy doesn't make you better nor does it make him a better doctor. Just makes you sink into hate and bitterness.
 
Hi there!

Thanks for your input. I'm not trained in anything along those lines, not even knowledgeable. However, if I eat a natural tomato from my garden I love it and if I eat one from the store, I'm close to puking as a body reflex to it. You know how we have that thing that makes us not swallow bad/expired/poisonous food? I get that with commercial tomatoes. Same stuff but not as bad with cucumbers and peppers. As a matter of fact, every single veggie or fruit from a store - compared to those I grow myself - lacks something both in terms of taste and energy it gives me and very interesting in the state of mind after eating it for a while.

Now, while I certainly agree that scientists (you included) know their science, I think saying that they get the entire picture would be a stretch. So I wouldn't really go as far as saying scientists know wtf they're doing really and understand all ramifications. In other words, you build a GMO and you analyze it as well as you know as a scientist and say "mmm, looks safe, no problems with it". But that's based only on stuff you knew to look at, only on information you already discovered and are basing yourself on, etc.

I'm not saying science is bad, but I am saying most people considering themselves scientists are very dogmatic. Most associate dogma with religions but that's not a real link. Dogma comes in science too and in every area. That's not the big problem though. The big problem is when a person (scientist, priest, teacher, developer) thinks he's got the true, and maybe the whole truth about something. Because that makes that person forget that in fact he has access to a very very thin slice of the whole story (truth).

Now back to tomatoes, what I'd really like to know is your opinion about how it would be possible for a GMO tomato to be healthy, yet last over 1 month at room temperature (not in the fridge even) and when I cut it it is in perfect shape like the day I bought it (no rot, no mold, no nothing), while my organic tomatos go bad in half a day in heat and after 1 week in the fridge they rot. So, if nature with its billion year evolution decided a tomato should rot after a few days, how is it we think we know better and at the same time we think we haven't messed anything in the process of producing the GMO, simple because we can't measure any problem?

And one last thing - maybe the problem isn't just with GMO but with everything else too that has to do with the food production - the soil you use or lack of soil (hydroponic), chems you use, natural sunlight or lack of it, location of where is produces, etc. But, I got to eat tomatoes from GMO seeds grown in my neighbor's garden - they taske better than the ones in the store but still totally crappy compared to my tomatoes. Yet, both were grown in the same medium and in the same place and in the same way.


Nothing is 100% certain, a good scientist will always use statistical hypothesis and with that they are never going to say this is for certain, but they will say they fail to agree with the other outcome (in my case that GMO is bad).

So you ask about the tomato, first off let me tell you that organic can be very hard to cultivate. A lot of organic farms still see pesticide blowover. I know for a fact that pesticide originating as far south as Omaha Nebraska have been collected as far as here in Canada (these pesticides would be banned here). You would need to be working in some very self contained conditions to remove environmental drift (which most organic farmers do not take account for). Back to the main point now, just because it lasts longer does not make it any worse. From my understanding of flowering plant botany, fruits are designed for 1 purpose - to be carry the seeds (next generation). Once the plant loses the fruit or the fruit has been sitting to long it will begin to die - why put energy in keeping something that probably won't be used for the ultimate goal? Now we don't just plant the seeds like the plant intended, we eat it. If we can trick the fruit into thinking it is still viable to germinate (grow another plant from seeds) and stop rotting I see no issue. Natural preservatives made in the plant itself are cool with me. I do agree that if the fruit was sprayed down after with a preservative I would be less inclined to eat it.

I can not really comment about taste here since to each his own. I do think that the process of moving a tomato can break it down. I'd need to look into that with more detail myself but I do not think that being GMO makes it taste bad.

I do agree the other things can impact the health. For instance I do not like my GMO products being pesticide resistant just so a company like Monsanto can spray a lot of insecticide on it.

I do think GMO is the future in mass agriculture, my biggest gripe is taking patents out on seeds. Companies like monsanto are just going to end up ruling the world. if they are the only ones who are allowed to grow viable crops down the line.

Thanks for your feedback I always like reading and answering science related questions.
 
How did you come to this conclusion? What kind of testing persuaded you? In vitro testing? In mice?

In other words, do you trust any test other than "here is our humans test group, here's our humans control group, here's X years of consumption, here's a huge list of medical conditions we are looking into, here's the statistical results"?


Gene X is introduced into a pea plant to help it grow. As a scientist I understand that gene x will make it grow but also can effect other genes (potentially). After the tomato is produced I would be looking at the chemical components even at trace amounts. I think in the end it's the chemical composition that matters. If for instance everything else was normal but depleted levels of ABA (an inhibition chemical in plant growth) I would not worry to much because the other chemicals would generally be safe. We have to understand that the genes that these plants receive are not going to do anything to us, it is what they produce chemically.

I also do trust those test group type tests if they are conducted by real staticians. I understand that these would be the final test to make sure that the product is safe.

Is releasing these products safe in the mean time? I think if the chemical composition is fine then we should not go crazy (still test it though). Is it ethical do release things this way? In my opinion it's either we trust them now or we start running dry on food. I get that it basically forces most people to eat GMO but I'd rather have more people eating (which we still need to work on with so many dying people in other poverty stricken countries).

Thanks for the question!
 
Last edited:
@GentlemanX

I don't think a fruit/veggie is bad just because it is a GMO. Reason for that being that humans have been selectively breeding both plants and animals for hundreds of years, maybe thousands. So in a way choosing a certain plant to be the parent for future plants based on certain features (size, taste, resistance, etc) is still a form of GMO production. Also I don't think that just because you tinker with some gene necessarily makes the plant unhealthy.

However, in practice problem is not with GMO alone but a lot of other details. For example most tomatoes in my country get picked up from the plant while green and then are being colored through chemical processes. Or they get colored while on the plant but still through chemical processes. Besides from that, the plant might be modified to have features that have nothing to do with useful, healthy aspects but with color, size, shelf life, etc. All these together seem to me are diminishing certain useful characteristics of the plant and potentially enhance characteristics that are not so good. Specifically, the tomatoes I grow - though I never measured them - likely contain massive amounts of Vitamin C. I say this because if i cut my skin on my hand and touch it with some tomato juice it hurts like a fucker. If I do it with juice from a tomato from the store, or even a GMO grown in my garden, I feel nothing. I do remember reading somewhere that a guy actually took veggies and chemically analyzed them and they had between 10 to 100's times less good stuff in them (vitamins, minerals, etc) and about 2 chemicals that were unhealthy they had huge amounts of them (can't remember details, weren't above max allowed limits but were a lot more than normal fruit/veggie).

Now, I do agree that Earth's population is increasing and we need more food. But I do not agree that you necessarily have to change food so much or the growth process. In fact, I am quite sure the GMO approach, pesticides and everything in the farming process has to do more with the increase in profit for the food producers. Also, the fact people have a habit of throwing shit away and not knowing well their own consumption needs weights in a lot - you need extended shelf life and esthetic characteristics (nice looking fruits) because of this. When it comes to meat i even worse - you get the animals consume drugs and all that so they don't die, they're on steroid and modified so bad they break their own legs because they're too heavy for them, etc.

So we essentially have an industrialized food production system where the main goal is not food quality but profit. Even worse, there is no competing food for various reasons and where it is, many times is just bullshit because while it says "organic" or "natural" it might be just as bad depending on the country we're talking about and the legislation. In my country "100% natural" and "organic" from a legal standpoint means nothing and you could sell rocks, they'd still be "organic" and "100% natural" from a legal perspective. Now, some people would say is a matter of demand - people want this type of food. But is not. That's bullshit. Most people have no idea whatsoever of how a natural tomato tastes like. If all they find in stores are industrial food and especially if industrial food is way cheaper, combined with the fact most people have a hard time financially, they will obviously buy that. So you end up with people eating crap, over long term ending up ill, then spending money on drugs and doctors, while they're overworking themselves to pay the loans they took.

I won't even go into subtle energetic aspects of food - food being not only some matter/chemicals but in fact information+energy that an animal/human needs to function and be healthy. As I said, I won't go into that because not everybody resonates with this, believes it or has enough background on it.
 
Gene X is introduced into a pea plant to help it grow. As a scientist I understand that gene x will make it grow but also can effect other genes (potentially). After the tomato is produced I would be looking at the chemical components even at trace amounts. I think in the end it's the chemical composition that matters. If for instance everything else was normal but depleted levels of ABA (an inhibition chemical in plant growth) I would not worry to much because the other chemicals would generally be safe. We have to understand that the genes that these plants receive are not going to do anything to us, it is what they produce chemically.

I also do trust those test group type tests if they are conducted by real staticians. I understand that these would be the final test to make sure that the product is safe.

Is releasing these products safe in the mean time? I think if the chemical composition is fine then we should not go crazy (still test it though). Is it ethical do release things this way? In my opinion it's either we trust them now or we start running dry on food. I get that it basically forces most people to eat GMO but I'd rather have more people eating (which we still need to work on with so many dying people in other poverty stricken countries).

Thank you for taking the time to answer, I was curious to take a peek at your thinking process.

If I'm reading this correctly, you are saying that "indications are positive, and while we can't be 100% sure, it is unethical not to go with it because we are not producing food fast enough. So between the low chance of killing millions in the future and saving millions now, I side with saving millions now".

I find this an interesting position but (fortunately!) an unsound one. The strong point of this position is the ethical dilemma, as it is indeed a hard one. So, the easiest way to attack this position is to destroy the ethical dilemma. And I'm going to do this by the laziest way I know, namely data.

Take a look at this graph:
ugdgr5q.jpg

The marginal food production to marginal human population ratio is significantly larger than one and (to my surprise) nearly constant in time. Or (in my favorite way of reading graphs), "such food, much bacon, wow!"

Assuming the data is right and there's not been a reversal in this trend recently (didn't bother checking, please someone with more time do so), people starving is Africa is not a result of the world's food production capability. Given that, there is not ethical dilemma to ponder upon. So now, why would we be supporting GMO if we're just left with the possible negative outcome?
 
Thanks for the advice! I'm about to write a list of all the meds he's prescribed me and atenlenol was one of them... which I believe is a beta-blocker. That drug specifically gave me migraine like headaches and horrible insomnia. I was popping ibuprofens that weren't doing anything and didn't sleep or workout for 3 days straight. So eventually I just said "screw this" and flushed them down the toilet.

I've also taking inderal / propranolol and get very little to no side effects (which is weird cause it's also a beta-blocker) ... only problem is it doesn't actually lower my BP. It does make me feel very calm and relaxed, my breathing slows down, but my actually numbers never drop.

Here is the list of meds I've been prescribed -

1) Losartan / Cozaar - This actually DID drop my numbers but it made me extremely lethargic, tired, muscle weakness, couldn't lift, couldn't run, couldn't get stuff done so I couldn't take it.

2) Atenolol - Gave me excruciating headaches like I said. Felt like someone was blowing up a balloon in the back of my head and I'd pound my head all day like a monkey.

3) Dyazide - Made me very dizzy, got vertigo, when I'd bend over it felt like the world was spinning. Made me loopy and disorganized. Plus I'd wake up 2-3 times during the night just to pee (from what I understand this med acts like a diuretic).

4) Toprol - Never did anything. No side effects but it also didn't drop my BP. We tried raising the dose and it was the same story.

5) Bystolic - This crap felt like poison. I'd get aches in my joints and muscles. But the worst part was the chest pain. I got this pain in my chest anytime I took a deep breath. And I'd pound on my chest to try and make it go away. If I went for a run, forget it, I felt like I was having a heart attack. I got very scared from the chest pain so I immediately stopped taking it.

6) Clonidine - Was given 100mcg / day during a hypertensive crisis for about 4 weeks straight then tapered off. This stuff worked like a charm. Down side is it felt a bit like valium. It made me very tired in a calm, relaxed, doped up sort of way. It also made me feel a bit groggy in the morning but it was honestly no big deal. The only reason I didn't take it long term is he said "you're not suppose to take clonidine long term". Which I'm still not sure if that's true or not.

7) Inderal - One of the better meds I took. And I still keep a supply in my home for giving speeches. It makes me feel extremely calm. Slows my breathing. I get no physical signs of anxiety in public (racing heart, sweaty hands, shaking, trembling, etc). And I get very few side effects at all. I honestly wish this med worked but unfortunately, it will not bring down my numbers. Even if I go up to 80mg my #'s maintain in stage 2 hypertension.

8 & 9.... I can't remember. But I do have them written down somewhere in my medical journal.

10 will be the Volsartan... which as far as I know is a sister of Losartan aka Cozaar. So I'm expecting unbearable side effects with that as well. I'm yet to actually fill the script but we'll see how it goes.

In the meantime I've set up an order for suboxone and clonidine online. I'm going to keep the sub as a back up for emergency and the clonidine I may use to manipulate my numbers for our next visit. I may honestly just tell the doctor "the volsartans working great!" meanwhile I'll just pop 1 clonidine every month before I go in. And I'll also keep them encase of another hypertensive crisis.

If he wants to get manipulative and controlling with me, we'll see who can control who. This will buy me a few more months to find a PROPER doctor then hopefully by then I can sort things out the right way... whichever way that is.

-BB
Atenolol is indeed a beta blocker as is propranolol. I've personally been on the later and it worked like a treat, although you've hit the head on the issue with your breathing, in that it does reduce the ability of the lungs to function although it's not a problem as long as you're not asthmatic.

Personally, I don't actually like thiazides like diazide for the reasons you've mentioned above. It can also be particularly nasty on the kidneys. It's clear though that you're not some numpty patient and you have actually got real adverse reactions to these meds. I never asked this before, but do you suffer from hyperthyroidism? Even with the propranolol, hyperthyroidism would still override the effects of these drugs.
Also, are you getting the same BP's in the doctors office as well as your bp monitor at home? Inderal is a nice little drug in that it was designed as an anti anxiety pill but also did help some people lower their bp. Same goes with viagra, that was meant as a pill for the heart and well, we all know what happened with that one!
 
Assuming the data is right and there's not been a reversal in this trend recently (didn't bother checking, please someone with more time do so), people starving is Africa is not a result of the world's food production capability. Given that, there is not ethical dilemma to ponder upon. So now, why would we be supporting GMO if we're just left with the possible negative outcome?

I'm cracking right now. This is why I love you. Just to expand on this...

The food that is left to go bad in the "evolved" world is enough to feed much of the hungry folks in other regions. As a matter of fact, since there are hungry people in developed countries too, this could could help them not starve. Then again, just as it happens at macro level so it happens at micro level - rather than give stuff for free and have a negative economic impact, they prefer to throw it away. As a matter of fact countries have been known to throw tonnes of grain into the ocean just so they can keep the price high. Amazing right?!

Famine - regardless of geographical location - is not a result of lack of food or other type of resources nor is it a result of geography, temperature, lack of water - as I have seen some say (including documentaries). It is a result of a calculated strategy to maintain a certain development level (or lack of) in that area. So whenever you hear politicians or whomever speak of efforts to help those in need, know that they are either stupid and ignorant or they know exactly how it is and they're just spitting crap to the masses.

So the reason we have GMOs and other food "enhancements" is in fact not because of a need for them. Even if we'd accept the idea that the world needs more food and all that, GMOs are not the only way to achieve this. You can have farms around cities (solves short shelf life problem) and 100 other things that solve the made-up problems with regular products.

Just in closing, did you know that various companies have started to work on gaining monopoly on clean water supply in many countries and some by now actually have monopoly on water supply? I'm not one of those everything-is-a-conspiracy people, but when you hear that in some places a bottle of Coca-Cola is cheaper than a bottle of plain water (also sold by the Coca-Cola company) you know something's way off with that picture.
 
Other reasons for not wanting a fat doctor include his moobs rubbing against you while he checks your ears!
 
Doctor - (he finally realizes all his patients are listening and shuts the door)

This was the most interesting part of your story to me, BB.

Your doctor had the door open the whole time? :p
 
Call the market place and get health coverage its extremely cheap. i pay 60.00 a month, my meds have a deductible where I'm responsible for the first 150.00 then after that its 15.00.
 
This was the most interesting part of your story to me, BB.

Your doctor had the door open the whole time? :p

Yes. Which creates a liability and I don't think the suboxone board would be happy about that.

Once a doctor decides to get licensed for suboxone, he is entering a completely different practice. A very dangerous practice if you ask me. And that is why like 5% of doctors get licensed for sub. After a doctor gets that license he opens his door to drug addicts and people with all sorts of criminal records.

All it would take is 1 unstable person to follow me out to my car, pull out a gun, steal my script and wallet then go get their fix. And if I made it out alive, I'd sue the shit out of my doctor for malpractice.

Another thing this guy does, which I've NEVER seen a doctor do... he keeps a black shiatsu in his office running around all day without a leash. I had no idea this was legal for doctors to do (since certain people are allergic to dogs). At first I thought it was pretty cool cause I love animals. And I assumed "if this doc keeps a dog in his office he's gotta be a laid back guy". But then 1 day the dog walked right into a "sterilized" room I was waiting in and pissed on the floor right in front of my feet. I yelled out "DOG, DOG is PISSING!!!!" The secretary ran in and apologized but I kept thinking "wtf is going on?" I even remember looking at her hands for some type of spray bottle and all I saw were paper towels. I was gonna say something like "no spray?" but that womans such a sweetheart and I didn't wanna get on her nerves.

Needless to say, he's a very sloppy doctor. :o

Call the market place and get health coverage its extremely cheap. i pay 60.00 a month, my meds have a deductible where I'm responsible for the first 150.00 then after that its 15.00.

$60 is really cheap! I had no idea you could get health insurance for the cost of a server. Definitely gotta look into that and thanks. :)
 
Last edited:
Report the doctor to med council or whatever for endangering lives of unsuspecting patients. No doctors can have a canine friend roam loose or even have it stay in a clinic or hospital. This is quite serious matter...
 
Last edited:
Not only should you report him like srb suggested, but you really should get another Dr. Its freaking insane for a dog to be running around a Dr's office.
 
Back
Top