assuming you are linking a finite number (12, in this example) of blogs to your money site, is the second configuration here better than the first?
FIRST:
blog1 --> moneysite
blog2 --> moneysite
blog3 --> moneysite
blog4 --> moneysite
blog5 --> moneysite
blog6 --> moneysite
blog7 --> moneysite
blog8 --> moneysite
blog9 --> moneysite
blog10 --> moneysite
blog11 --> moneysite
blog12 --> moneysite
SECOND
blog2 \
blog3 -> blog1 -->moneysite
blog4 /
blog6 \
blog7 -> blog5 --> moneysite
blog8 /
blog10 \
blog11 -> blog9 --> moneysite
blog12 /
Seems like the 2nd way would give more link juice, but the first way has more direct links. Which is more important for SEO?
Also, i'm assuming that in the second example, it's best if the lowest level blogs don't directly link to the money site, but only link to the blog that links to the money site.
FIRST:
blog1 --> moneysite
blog2 --> moneysite
blog3 --> moneysite
blog4 --> moneysite
blog5 --> moneysite
blog6 --> moneysite
blog7 --> moneysite
blog8 --> moneysite
blog9 --> moneysite
blog10 --> moneysite
blog11 --> moneysite
blog12 --> moneysite
SECOND
blog2 \
blog3 -> blog1 -->moneysite
blog4 /
blog6 \
blog7 -> blog5 --> moneysite
blog8 /
blog10 \
blog11 -> blog9 --> moneysite
blog12 /
Seems like the 2nd way would give more link juice, but the first way has more direct links. Which is more important for SEO?
Also, i'm assuming that in the second example, it's best if the lowest level blogs don't directly link to the money site, but only link to the blog that links to the money site.
Last edited: