1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

multiple layers of links are better, right? (diagram)

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by mollah, Apr 28, 2009.

?

Which setup is better for SEO?

  1. First diagram

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Second diagram

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. dude wtf is this ASCII shit, MSPaint a picture next time asshole

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. mollah

    mollah Power Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    674
    Likes Received:
    548
    assuming you are linking a finite number (12, in this example) of blogs to your money site, is the second configuration here better than the first?

    FIRST:

    blog1 --> moneysite
    blog2 --> moneysite
    blog3 --> moneysite
    blog4 --> moneysite
    blog5 --> moneysite
    blog6 --> moneysite
    blog7 --> moneysite
    blog8 --> moneysite
    blog9 --> moneysite
    blog10 --> moneysite
    blog11 --> moneysite
    blog12 --> moneysite


    SECOND

    blog2 \
    blog3 -> blog1 -->moneysite
    blog4 /

    blog6 \
    blog7 -> blog5 --> moneysite
    blog8 /

    blog10 \
    blog11 -> blog9 --> moneysite
    blog12 /


    Seems like the 2nd way would give more link juice, but the first way has more direct links. Which is more important for SEO?

    Also, i'm assuming that in the second example, it's best if the lowest level blogs don't directly link to the money site, but only link to the blog that links to the money site.
     
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2009
  2. skcaj88

    skcaj88 Newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Home Page:
    I really dont understand
     
  3. mollah

    mollah Power Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    674
    Likes Received:
    548
    Here are pics illustrating what I was trying to convey with text before.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  4. JonesersRX7

    JonesersRX7 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    154
    Have you read linkwheel yet?
     
  5. mollah

    mollah Power Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    674
    Likes Received:
    548
    No. Link please?
     
  6. OnFire25

    OnFire25 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    212

    Go here:
    Code:
    
    
    
    http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/member-downloads/66543-get-linkwheel.html
    
    
    
    
     
  7. yeti_racer

    yeti_racer Junior Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    87
    Location:
    Hick Ville
    If you follow method 2, it will allow you to "clean up" your links a bit before sending them on to your money site. Link laundering if you want to think of it in those terms. Although it really depends on how good your blogs are. If they are just random junk you're throwing up, then I'd say go with method 2 for sure just so you don't accidently drag your money site down. BUT, if you can keep the blogs decent then by all means go with method 1.

    #1 will also be better with quality blogs as it will help keep it around. The longer you can keep it going, the more use you can get out of it. Sending juice to new sites, you'll have more links, etc. And here is your linkwheel info:
    http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/member-downloads/66543-get-linkwheel.html
     
  8. mollah

    mollah Power Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    674
    Likes Received:
    548
    thanks for the linkwheel link.

    It seems that that is designed for web 2.0 sites. Would the same concept still apply for free blog sites? Or would it be better to do it one of the ways I illustrated in this thread?
     
  9. platinvm

    platinvm Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    384
    Location:
    TN
    Who said you cant do both, you have to mix it up a little. Google loves it!