- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
Have you tried just looking on their website? I would imagine that is more descriptive than someone that may use just one or two sections of a Moz account.
TheSEOWizard
Power Member
- Aug 20, 2011
- 550
- 157
You can check almost all the Moz products except for API usage. The API limits is the same for Moz Pro and Moz free. All other tools are included in the Moz Pro subscription. Overall, good for the price offered.
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
Fun fact; Moz Pro used to allow 1 API call per second as opposed to the 1 every 10 seconds of the free accounts now it is 1 every 10s just like the free version.
Also I find Majestic and Ahrefs to have superior indexes to Moz. I genuinely do not see why Moz is being so anti competitive recently.
TheSEOWizard
Power Member
- Aug 20, 2011
- 550
- 157
I agree. I am not sure if it was 1 API call every second or every 2 seconds. I forgot that. I doubt it was 1 API every two seconds as mentioned in the thread here:
https://moz.com/community/q/difference-between-seomoz-pro-and-mozscape-api-2
I agree that both Majestic and Ahrefs have superior indexers (in fact Ahrefs has the best though Majestic TF and CF are better metrics than Ahrefs DR). I also agree that Ahrefs and Majestic are becoming more lenient nowadays compared to the past while Moz is moving the other way around. For example, Long Tail Pro which used to use Moz in the past has now collaborated with Majestic and they are now considering Majestic TF CF while calculating keyword competitiveness. Majestic realized that Long Tail Pro has a large user base and sharing their metrics would only help them in the long term. I also doubt they might have made a fair deal with Long Tail Pro as a whole instead of charging individual customers.
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
The rate was 1/s as recently as 2015, I implemented it into DHG in 2015 and verified it as 1/s then at some point earlier this year they limited free accounts to 25k calls a month and the Pro account to 1/10s.
Also Moz have recently made you sign up to a "community" account to use stats in their browser extension. If you add in the fact that Moz have "monthly" updates compared to Majestic's more fluent continually updated index it is harder to trust the stats.
Now let's consider reliability a bit, in the past year they have missed at least 2 of their scheduled updates entirely. One of these updates completely screwed up stats on all web2.0 accounts which meant for a lot of people the entire service was completely useless for an entire month.
And my experience as a customer of their API service has been pretty terrible also. I have had more than one IP address blocked completely without notice despite all calls from them being fully paid for and legitimate API calls.
I cannot say that I have a whole lot of positives to say about Moz and how they have been running their business this year, not when compared to Majestic.
Sorry about the rant, I don't really know where that came from.
Also Moz have recently made you sign up to a "community" account to use stats in their browser extension. If you add in the fact that Moz have "monthly" updates compared to Majestic's more fluent continually updated index it is harder to trust the stats.
Now let's consider reliability a bit, in the past year they have missed at least 2 of their scheduled updates entirely. One of these updates completely screwed up stats on all web2.0 accounts which meant for a lot of people the entire service was completely useless for an entire month.
And my experience as a customer of their API service has been pretty terrible also. I have had more than one IP address blocked completely without notice despite all calls from them being fully paid for and legitimate API calls.
I cannot say that I have a whole lot of positives to say about Moz and how they have been running their business this year, not when compared to Majestic.
Sorry about the rant, I don't really know where that came from.
