Just wondering what the consensus is on minimum metrics for a domain to be used in a good PBN.
I'm mainly talking about TF CF and RD and DA.
For example: what if the TF/CF is 10/10, but the RD is 100. Would you still use this domain?
The higher the tf the higher the ranking impact. Absolutely not. Google doesn't consider tf or cf. There are tonnes of domains with amazing links from sites like huffingtonpost , CNN , cbc . And they will have a tf of 5. On the other hand there a loads of domains with high tf but not good links. Google will give a better ranking boost from the 5 tf domain because it has good links.TF shows the strength of the domain and RD is the incoming distribution of the strength. The higher the TF the higher the ranking impact. The higher the RD the safer the ranking impact
TF is not as important as people think it is and the TF/CF ratio is an even bigger joke.
DA and PA is whatever. I just look for a lot of RD, at least 10 TF, and great backlinks. That's it.
Minimum metrics depends on your budget, 10 RD and 10 TF is not necessarily bad but I wouldn't pick it up.
hahaha lol! Don't listen to this guyDA is first advise to choose .. after that you can consider on TF/CF
The higher the tf the higher the ranking impact. Absolutely not. Google doesn't consider tf or cf. There are tonnes of domains with amazing links from sites like huffingtonpost , CNN , cbc . And they will have a tf of 5. On the other hand there a loads of domains with high tf but not good links. Google will give a better ranking boost from the 5 tf domain because it has good links.
TF cf can easily be manipulated. And they are not the metrics you should care about. You should care about good rd and good links. Tf cf is only good for filtering out bad domains if your doing your own scrape .
Ya but that person specifically said the higher the tf the higher the ranking impact as if Google cares about tfIN THEORY. For sure Google doesn't use TF to rank sites lol. Metrics can always be manipulated but they are good for a general benchmark. Links you stated are overrated imo because many links from such authority sites are crap (nofollow, link from unimportant subpage etc.). Most of the time TF correlates with the ranking impact but it's not 100% precise as every approximation.
Ya but that person specifically said the higher the tf the higher the ranking impact as if Google cares about tf
My only standard: DA >= 15 and MUST have very good backlink profiles (No SPAMMY backlinks and backlink from high DA/DR authority website).Just wondering what the consensus is on minimum metrics for a domain to be used in a good PBN.
I'm mainly talking about TF CF and RD and DA.
For example: what if the TF/CF is 10/10, but the RD is 100. Would you still use this domain?
TF shows the strength of the domain and RD is the incoming distribution of the strength. The higher the TF the higher the ranking impact. The higher the RD the safer the ranking impact. That's in theory. So there are too many other factors which I won't explain here.