Well... You can always disavow them...It's only copyright violation if you do it. You can't steal. They can. Learn the rules, boy.
Well... You can always disavow them...
You don't get their traffic and they won't get your content.
The difference before was that most webmasters were okay with a snippet being shown because there was a link to the source material to read more. The entire PAA explosion was based on that simple social contract, but theft's happening now--since there's no reason to visit the site.That would work if everyone did it, but we know the vast majority won't do it. That's why they keep stealing. And they have been stealing for a long time. The previews you get on Google are exactly that: stolen content.
Nah, boy.It's only copyright violation if you do it. You can't steal. They can. Learn the rules, boy.
Nah, boy.
Most publisher Microsoft is stealing from did not gave the permission to bing unlike to google whom almost everyone give permission by submitting their sitemap and requesting to index.
Even that I don't think let's google to steal like the way bing is doin.
This is different.
To give the perspective to everyone heres what Microsoft is doing.
It is showing the source to users so that it can give the legitimacy to the answers of being fatual unlike openai chatgpt.
In the process its stealing the content and giving back publishers nothing.