Low impression share despite budget

Bing uses a different auction system than Google, so settings like match types and ad schedules may affect your impression volume more than expected.
 
your click through rate is dead, so bing is just hiding your ad. the platform only makes money when people click, not when you just stare at a high budget.
stop messing with your bids. just rewrite your ad titles to make them actually clickable, and the impressions will fix themselves :smirk:
 
Even with enough budget, my Bing campaigns are barely showing. CTR is low, conversions zero, and impression share says less than 20%. What could be wrong?
Honestly for me the issue was campaign structure. Too many keywords in one ad group made performance messy and impressions dropped.
 
check quality score and ad relevance first, low impression share with budget left over usually means bids too low or qs tanking you
 
the zero conversions part jumps out more than the impression share for me. have you confirmed your UET tag is actually firing? happens way more than people think on bing... they blame the auction when really the tag never installed right or the goal is pointing at the wrong page. run the uet tag helper and check it before touching anything else, otherwise you could fix impressions and still see zero.

for the impression share, single digit with budget left usually means your bids are under the first page estimate or qs is tanking you. bing actually shows that estimated first page bid per keyword, pull that column and compare against what you're bidding. and honestly their search volume is just thinner than google so a chunk of keywords barely get traffic no matter how clean the setup is.
 
@Rankings Daily already nailed the part everyone keeps skipping. Zero conversions with budget left is a tracking problem first, not an auction problem. Check the UET tag before anything else, if it never fired or the goal points at the wrong url you'll fix impressions and still sit at zero.

One thing nobody mentioned... pull the "expected click through rate" and "ad relevance" columns separately in the keyword view, not just the combined quality score. Bing rolls them into one number but the breakdown tells you exactly what's dragging you. Had a campaign last year sitting at like 15% impression share, turned out it was landing page relevance tanking the whole thing, ads and keywords were fine.

@tonghuyhoang kinda right that better titles help but rewriting copy while the tag is broken just means you're optimizing blind. fix tracking, pull the first page bid estimate column, then touch the copy.
 
Glad you got it sorted @CampaignMastermind but yeah what @tonghuyhoang said about bing hiding ads is so true. if you start a campaign with low bids or bad copy, bing basically soft-bans the campaign from getting impressions. had this happen on a lead gen campaign last month... budget was there but zero impressions for days. i had to jack the bids up 3x for like 48 hours just to force the algorithm to wake up, then scaled them back down once the CTR stabilized. their system is way more sensitive to early CTR than google. anyway, what actually ended up fixing it for you?
 
If it's a new campaign, set a higher CPC limit to "buy data", and maybe target pay per click. And once the campaign begin running and having conversions you might optimize for CPA
 
yeah search partners on bing is usually what kills campaigns early on. if you leave syndication partners on, they flood you with trash impressions, tank your ctr, and then the algorithm basically stops showing your ads on actual search. always start on bing owned and operated only. if you need more volume later maybe try partners but honestly its mostly garbage traffic anyway. glad you got it sorted though, always a pain when campaigns start dead.
 
Back
Top