Look what Article Forge have generated

AI content is fine for web2.0 or any sort of backlink that is not really huge. If you expected A++ graded for $57 a month, you have issues.
 
I'm working on my own content rewriter. Especially when applying synonymization, it becomes a bit muddy, but still because it's an article rewriter, it keeps a consistent line in the story, and it actually does make sense. It just looks a little... 'indian'.

I've included screenshots of its output. It doesn't rewrite the whole input, because it doesn't have enough grammar patterns yet to have something for every input sentence, but it does work a little bit already.

Left box = input
Middle box = Spintax output
Right box = a spin from box 2

rewrite1.jpg
rewrite2.jpg
rewrite3.jpg


I made it to parse grammar rules based on Penntree POS tagging.

A penntree based on a sentence looks like this:

Code:
(ROOT
  (S
    (NP
      (NP (NN Littering))
      (, ,)
      (NP (NN storm) (NNS winds))
      (, ,)
      (CC and)
      (NP (JJ poor) (NN waste) (NN management)))
    (RB all)
    (VP (VB contribute)
      (PP (TO to)
        (NP
          (NP (DT the) (NN accumulation))
          (PP (IN of)
            (NP
              (NP (DT this) (NN debris))
              (, ,)
              (NP
                (NP (CD 80) (NN percent))
                (PP (IN of)
                  (SBAR
                    (WHNP (WDT which))
                    (S
                      (VP (VBZ comes)
                        (PP (IN from)
                          (NP
                            (NP (NNS sources))
                            (PP (IN on)
                              (NP (NN land)))))))))))))))
    (. .)))

A grammar rule looks like this:

Code:
# The negative effects on health and the environment caused by algal blooms  hurt local fishing and tourism industries.

# local fishing and tourism industries [are] hurt by The negative effects on health and the environment caused by algal blooms
[NP] [CC] [NP] [VBP] [NP] => 5 are(VBP) 4(PAST_PARTICIPLE) by(IN) 1 2 3

That's what I made so far with still some bugs.. and it's far from finished, but it'll allow me to massively rewrite articles to fill up my soon to be large content empire. Pretty neat right?
 
I've yet to see anything close to what a human could write.

If you want unique content for Google - go for it, but if the end result is to use this with real humans - forget it.

They will scan it, find it difficult to read and abandon. Although you could create high ranking, low quality content sites with the intent of pushing them to highly visual ads so that when the user realizes the content is nonsensical, maybe they'll go on and click a really prominent display banner.
 
I also tried article forge for some keywords but for me it worked for some specific topics and for others content is like a crap.
 
Wow. Thanks for sharing. I was thinking of getting this in my group buy package. Looks like not worth it.
 
I've yet to see anything close to what a human could write.

GPT-3 with subtle manipulation can achieve that, at the end of the day, the so called AI is not real AI that can understand itself is an AI, though its pretty good enough.
 
Well this is better than some articles I've bought in the past.
Yeah, that's weird. I don't know what the OP expected for $0.1 article. I sold those articles for the purpose of linkbuilding after minor corrections and they were rated very high.
You can make this tool work for you, if you understand how to talk to it.

I am a developer, so I understand machines are stupid and the human behind them has nothing to do with machine intself.
So don't blame it on creators of ArticleForge. Their intentions were good and they help you as much as they can with their content.
In fact there is no better spinner than one of theirs. I used to pull a good amount of cash from google using their technologies.

Get your facts right. And forget anyone will give if you an article, review ready that was written by an AI.
Do you think why conversion.ai, copy.ai and other services never try to sell you articles?
Cause they have nothing to offer beyond spun headlines and bullet lists. They won't get you a whole article, only rewrite your content.
They in fact are so poorly designed, they ask you for sources they will use to rewrite. Now, this is real bs.
 
Last edited:
Calm down guys , the "content problem" has largely being solved by conversion.ai.
Cheers.
 
Calm down guys , the "content problem" has largely being solved by conversion.ai.
Cheers.

It's indeed getting worse by the hour. Also, as someone mentioned, this will likely kill text content. It's basically becoming all AI rewritten trash out there.
 
Back
Top