Ugh. I am not challenging the verdict. I do want to yet again clear up my own experience. This is important as it's very possible and even likely others will have this experience.
- You got reports and waited an unreasonable amount of time to look them over.
I did check the reports. I don't have much time. I did bring up the lack of comments on the links I checked and took him on his word when he excused it away. I didn't fully check
all the links because it was too
time consuming. When it became a
pressing issue I did comprehensively check them and yeah, didn't like what I saw. There's literally nothing there. I didn't find ONE comment.
Even without those reports, the results or rather lack thereof spoke for itself. I saw there was an increasing number of "interested" on the event and believed it. Under further scrutiny I concluded those were fake accounts and that threw the legitimacy of his claims even further in doubt.
But the final straw was when he wouldn't reply to my messages after being very quick to communicate before hand. The red flags were all there which is why I brought it to the SL in the first place.
- You attempted to change the actual deal and say he was getting paid on performance and not on the posts
I shouldn't have said that. No doubt. I was stunned by his sudden change of attitude and tone. But still a wrong approach. I don't consider myself having tried to actually change the deal but whatever.
At the time I thought he was just underperforming and didn't want to be too legalese in my response. I was hoping instead of zero-sum discourse we could come to some arrangement for the future. Once I saw there was a good chance he didn't perform at all, well, you saw the consequence.