Like SORA? Love KLING!

The Scarlet Pimp

Supreme Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
1,418
Reaction score
4,459
Kling, a new AI video generation model from Chinese company Kuaishou, is making waves with its ability to create stunningly realistic videos up to 2 minutes long from text prompts.

This powerful AI rivals even OpenAI's upcoming Sora model, showcasing China's growing dominance in the field of artificial intelligence.

With Kling's advanced features and open-access approach, the future of AI video generation is here and more accessible than ever before, but only available if you have a Chinese phone number.

 
While everyone is waiting for Sora, the Chinese can already get Kling in the public domain, besides, Kling gives out 1 minute longer than their competitor
 
Do you have chinese phone number to get access? or are you selling accounts?
 
Another cringe. Why do we do that? Cannot we just automate our cameras? What is so hard about it? The whole generative video AI is based on a stupid idea we need to recreate the reality instead of just being in it and using tools we already have cause "we always need something better, more powerful". This isn't powerful. This is a gimmick.

It's something like video games - you don't need them, they're just cool but they don't really give you any purpose or something. So I don't think it's a good direction for humanity. It's awful. Does anyone even ask a question why do we do that... No? Microsoft is banking... that's all that matters. o_O

Using it feels like imprisoning oneself. You have to trick yourself to believe it makes sense and it has something to do with actual intelligence. Stick to machine learning use cases that work and have been applied for decades. This sh1t is a stupid hyped use case nobody really needs in their life. It's like a smokescreen.
 
Last edited:
It's something like video games - you don't need them, they're just cool but they don't really give you any purpose or something. So I don't think it's a good direction for humanity. It's awful. Does anyone even ask a question why do we do that... No? Microsoft is banking... that's all that matters. o_O

Today I'm feeling nostalgic for pre-CGI effects. Here's a great example:

The backstory for the "car healing itself" special effect:
Originally, Carpenter had not planned to film the car's regeneration scenes, but gave special effects supervisor Roy Arbogast three weeks to devise a way for the car to rebuild itself. Arbogast and his team made rubber molds from one of the cars, including a whole front end. One of the cars was stripped of its engine to accommodate internally-mounted hydraulics that pulled the framework inward, crumpling the car, with the shot then run backwards in the final film.

Brilliant.
 
Today I'm feeling nostalgic for pre-CGI effects. Here's a great example:

The backstory for the "car healing itself" special effect:
Originally, Carpenter had not planned to film the car's regeneration scenes, but gave special effects supervisor Roy Arbogast three weeks to devise a way for the car to rebuild itself. Arbogast and his team made rubber molds from one of the cars, including a whole front end. One of the cars was stripped of its engine to accommodate internally-mounted hydraulics that pulled the framework inward, crumpling the car, with the shot then run backwards in the final film.

Brilliant.
In reality you can easily control those parameters like light, sound, scene etc. With AI it takes ages to get that control. And the end effect, no matter how hard you try, is not real. It's just reversing reality using some odd idea.

Maybe one day they'll finally create some metaverse where it will look more realistic and it won't be generative, but rendered.
 
What is so hard about it? The whole generative video AI is based on a stupid idea we need to recreate the reality instead of just being in it and using tools we already have cause
You are really missing the bus.
 
You are really missing the bus.
No, I'm not missing anything and I'm thinking in abundance, not scarcity.
Your second comment proves that.
@The Scarlet Pimp How to get into this ? I have a meeting tomorrow if I can get a way to access Kling, that may change my life forever.
Money can't change your life. It's a falsehood. So no tool will change it.
 
No, I'm not missing anything and I'm thinking in abundance, not scarcity.
Your second comment proves that.

Money can't change your life. It's a falsehood. So no tool will change it.
I have seen many losers in my life. The lesson learned is " Fuckin' IGNORE' and "Move on".

Just checked your timeline and saw this.

1721645638938.png
1721645678172.png
1721645708294.png
1721645753788.png



Bruhh... your life is too small than my D.
 
The whole generative video AI is based on a stupid idea we need to recreate the reality instead of just being in it
No volcanos erupting inside a coffee mug in my reality too often. Did you see the examples of what it does?
 
No volcanos erupting inside a coffee mug in my reality too often. Did you see the examples of what it does?
It does what my brain does when I smoke too much garbage which I've been avoiding for years due to me dreaming too hard anyways without it.
 
It does what my brain does when I smoke too much garbage
sometimes it is called creativity or even art, depends how you see it but there are different useful applications to those kinds of vids, i.e. marketing
 
sometimes it is called creativity or even art, depends how you see it but there are different useful applications to those kinds of vids, i.e. marketing
Can't see it further than a cheap stock footage with VFX replacement. Really we've been able to achieve this decades ago. People who get so hyped about it probably won't even use it. If it will be really useful, you will use it. But it won't be because we have already too much stable video. Netflix library is creative and big enough and I don't think it'll make any difference. It'll just make user generated stuff more feasible. Real creators won't benefit from it too much, maybe they'll have lives easier to an extent, but I doubt they'll use publicly available models - they're toys as I've been analyzing past 3 years.
 
But it won't be because we have already too much stable video.
If you need a volcano erupting in a coffee mug for a coffee advertisement how would you do it? Is it as easy as typing a prompt? or do you get equipment, film a mug, and post-production with visual effects that will take hours of work/ costly outsourcing?
 
If you need a volcano erupting in a coffee mug for a coffee advertisement how would you do it? Is it as easy as typing a prompt? or do you get equipment, film a mug, and post-production with visual effects that will take hours of work/ costly outsourcing?
The level of skill needed for both looks kind of similar. I don't know, sounds like 3% of the whole thing. So what that I have advertising? It's a small part of marketing and even smaller of business. Writing that prompt will take hours, then you'll need to make it coherent with brand and train that AI. Before you do it, someone else will do all of it manually. So I find it just overrated.
 
Good news: kling is now open to the public.

Bad news: the captcha is broken so you can't sign up. you must slide a puzzle piece to the right, but it's stuck.

try it at https://klingai.com
 
Back
Top