Just bought www.dlickbank.com :)

I'm no where near as versed on this as a lot of you guys are. But if it was really so serious of an issue, why are sites like goggle.com still up and running?

Just curious...

Well, I'm no expert here ... but I'd guess it has to do with the fact that "goggle" is a regular dictionary word that has not undergone the trademark rigor as has Google.com

There have been some issues with some speculators/scalpers trying to trademark every dictionary word. They're losing that battle, last I heard. I hope it continues, although I've not followed it closely.
 
I believe the highlighting of his name went to his head. Clearly he believes he's better than everyone here.

Apparently the highlighting of my name has a reason - my head contains FACTUAL resource based on study and experience. Unlike you, I didnt just pop out of nowhere posting USELESS input. 2 experienced people have already spoken and refuted your claim. You dont even have a clue of what you're talking about. Youre a sham. How ironic isn't it?

I can see by this post (and your other posts) that you can rationalize and frame anything in a manner that makes sense to you. You'd be a good lawyer. Unfortunately it doesn't make you any more correct in your assumptions about my "psyche" or any less obnoxious. Unlike you, I'm not worried about being right here. I was just pointing out the obvious fact that you were being a bitch... simple as that. No more - no less. Don't read into it, because you're not good at it.

Sorry to burst your bubble sweetheart but me getting worried about being right has never been the issue since the minute I begin typing on this thread, I already know im right. Its sad that you faltered to understand my point about the topic, only people of the same frequency can see it. Bitch? Yes I can understand. Thats how some men react towards people who are brighter than them. Dont worry I forgive you. After all, Jesus said to love their enemies.
 
meta refresh maybe :)

Seriously. Picture the scenario. Copyright (copywritten) domain points to redirect which points to landing page. Landing page is some sort of affiliate link. If owner of domain is pointing toward clickbank... then.. what the hell is the point of blanking via the meta refresh. Nice try, although I still don't believe clickbank would perform anything civil or criminal.

If clickbank wanted to investigate, they would simply follow the links and find the end result. The person behind it would entered the name the check should be issued to plus address details and such... I am really just stating the obvious.
 
Last edited:
bad comment. nevermnd ;)
 
Last edited:
The reality is that if the OP starts making some real coin with this domain, it is only a matter of time before clickbank notices and takes legal action. Of course, the severity of the consequences depends on where he lives, etc.

Unless you are happy with just making small change, don't expect this to make you any real money.

I had once taken down a domain squatter that was using one of my trademarks in his domain name. This was in spite of the fact that the domain was registered several years BEFORE I had registered the trademark (however my LLC was incorporated much earlier and had been already using the trademark without registration). It wasn't difficult at all to shut him down and recover damages.
 
this was a really great idea, I will probably also use this in the future, buying dozens of typo error domains from major online companies, and them monetize them like crazy!
 
dlickbank

Not enough data

Not enough data

Not rli any searches for it on google per month so not a lot of people actually make that mistake.

But still hope you do good henry.
 
dlickbank

Not enough data

Not enough data

Not rli any searches for it on google per month so not a lot of people actually make that mistake.

But still hope you do good henry.

Just registered it yesterday.

I'll get on later and post - I'm at school and can't stay long.
 
Yea but i meant for the searches on google trough their keyword tool.
 
Mason you are categorically and unequivocally wrong!

Read up on the links I provided above and you'll see how cybersquatting, which is essentially what the OP is doing, is dealt with.

I make no judgement whether he's right or wrong. Quite frankly I don't care. But as we all know ignorance is no defense and it pays to know what the possible consequences are. If one chooses to ignore them that's their concern.

L

Actually no, I am not wrong. What we have in this thread are a bunch of fake lawyers trying to give legal advice about something they clearly do not know about. First of all, I wasn't even talking about cybersquatting, the OP wasn't talking about cybersquatting, and that's not actually what he's doing. Registering the domain dlickbank.com and then redirecting to the site clickbank.com is not cybersquatting and it's something Clickbank likely wouldn't pursue and they would have NO legal grounds for if the registrar was located in China. This is not an opinion, it IS a fact.

Apparently the highlighting of my name has a reason - my head contains FACTUAL resource based on study and experience. Unlike you, I didnt just pop out of nowhere posting USELESS input. 2 experienced people have already spoken and refuted your claim. You dont even have a clue of what you're talking about. Youre a sham. How ironic isn't it?

NOTHING about my post was useless. You may think so because you find it so hard to believe that someone who doesn't have their name highlighted in white would know something that you clearly don't. Your post are pure comedy. Your sitting here calling people names for not apparently knowing the law, and you don't know it yourself. How ironic?

Not sure where you get that that impression. I think I've been pretty honest here. If you have issues with debate, stay out of forums.

If you really need to use a possessive pronoun in responding to my posts, you may as well use "her", not "his".

I wasn't talking about you. I probably should have said Snowwhite, but I thought that was pretty clear.

I have no issues with debate, but do you really think consistently calling someone names is debating? If so, I advise you to stop getting your debating lessons from video game forums.

Sure, you can get a registrar and hosting in China or Russia. Do you really think that will work with CB products?

.


I don't think. I know for sure that will work for what the OP is trying to do. I'm not sure what you mean by clickbank products?
 
See what others are doing. XlickBank uses the redirect to a product. Frankwyatt is his name (Go to buy page and scroll to bottom to find the affiliate) and he redirects to Keyword Elite.

I actually just found another great typo...maybe I'll buy it. You make one sale/referral and boom.
 
Maybe i can sue mcdonalds as im sure my ancestors were around long before the food chain and thus i should have automatic trademark and copyright to the website ;)
 
Actually no, I am not wrong. What we have in this thread are a bunch of fake lawyers trying to give legal advice about something they clearly do not know about. First of all, I wasn't even talking about cybersquatting, the OP wasn't talking about cybersquatting, and that's not actually what he's doing. Registering the domain dlickbank.com and then redirecting to the site clickbank.com is not cybersquatting and it's something Clickbank likely wouldn't pursue and they would have NO legal grounds for if the registrar was located in China. This is not an opinion, it IS a fact.

Actually, that is a form of cybersquatting, so yes, you are wrong.

Typosquatting, also called URL hijacking, is a form of cybersquatting which relies on mistakes such as typographical errors made by Internet users when inputting a website address into a web browser. Should a user accidentally enter an incorrect website address, they may be led to an alternative website owned by a cybersquatter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typosquatting

the fact is you're infringing on a trademark AND stealing affiliate commissions you don't deserve. I'm not going to predict what will happen to you but I'm explaining the extent of your actions. Apparently giving legal advice here is looked down upon, so next time I'm sure we all won't try to save your ass and let you build yourself into a corner. Thanks for turning helpful advice into a three page argument.
 
Actually, that is a form of cybersquatting, so yes, you are wrong.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typosquatting

the fact is you're infringing on a trademark AND stealing affiliate commissions you don't deserve. I'm not going to predict what will happen to you but I'm explaining the extent of your actions. Apparently giving legal advice here is looked down upon, so next time I'm sure we all won't try to save your ass and let you build yourself into a corner. Thanks for turning helpful advice into a three page argument.

Oh come on, I can easily post here a 1000+ using this system and if you look at them and see their online statistics, you'll see that they're monetizing really really well.

And no action was ever taken upon then, even though some of these sites are online for some years now.

And btw were all BHers, we make money breaking or bending the rules, and some of these rules are far more important and legally questionable that this specific one.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top