Mactronn
Power Member
- Feb 17, 2009
- 594
- 320
No, idea. It may be protection in the case of incorrect data IMO.An important question should be, why do they keep including that disclaimer?
Is there any info from Google that requires them to do so?
No, idea. It may be protection in the case of incorrect data IMO.An important question should be, why do they keep including that disclaimer?
Is there any info from Google that requires them to do so?
If there's any form of incorrect data then their respective editors are to be held responsible not AI anymore, since they said it's beem fact-checked.No, idea. It may be protection in the case of incorrect data IMO.
Articles still ranking...Seems like google deindexed the articles.
If the content is good, trustworthy, and readable, no one is going to dig deep into it. So, it doesn't matter if it's an AI article or not; make sure the content is highly readable and true to what it speaks about.This tweet shows CNET, one of the biggest authority website is using AI to write content and have humans review them.
And Google apparently doesn't care much.
Perhaps it's time I figure out a way to let AI write for me instead of paying writers.
What do you think about. cNET using AI content writers?
You're rightIf the content is good, trustworthy, and readable, no one is going to dig deep into it. So, it doesn't matter if it's an AI article or not; make sure the content is highly readable and true to what it speaks about.
Proof AI content can rank.This tweet shows CNET, one of the biggest authority website is using AI to write content and have humans review them.
And Google apparently doesn't care much.
Perhaps it's time I figure out a way to let AI write for me instead of paying writers.
What do you think about. cNET using AI content writers?