It Seems Even Your Favorite Authority Websites Are Using AI Content

An important question should be, why do they keep including that disclaimer?

Is there any info from Google that requires them to do so?
No, idea. It may be protection in the case of incorrect data IMO.
 
No, idea. It may be protection in the case of incorrect data IMO.
If there's any form of incorrect data then their respective editors are to be held responsible not AI anymore, since they said it's beem fact-checked.
 
Seems like google deindexed the articles.
 
prompt: add this to the bottom of every article "This article was created using automation technology and thoroughly edited and fact-checked by an editor on our editorial staff." :)
 
This tweet shows CNET, one of the biggest authority website is using AI to write content and have humans review them.

And Google apparently doesn't care much.


Perhaps it's time I figure out a way to let AI write for me instead of paying writers.

What do you think about. cNET using AI content writers?
If the content is good, trustworthy, and readable, no one is going to dig deep into it. So, it doesn't matter if it's an AI article or not; make sure the content is highly readable and true to what it speaks about.
 
The credit card article is nearly 100% real going by the detector results, quite impressive.
 
If the content is good, trustworthy, and readable, no one is going to dig deep into it. So, it doesn't matter if it's an AI article or not; make sure the content is highly readable and true to what it speaks about.
You're right
 
This tweet shows CNET, one of the biggest authority website is using AI to write content and have humans review them.

And Google apparently doesn't care much.


Perhaps it's time I figure out a way to let AI write for me instead of paying writers.

What do you think about. cNET using AI content writers?
Proof AI content can rank.
 
Back
Top