Is this Penguin 2.0?????????????????????????????????????

There are millions of sites linking to other websites, they can't penalize all of them for that. They might target low quality and new sites which are linking to others.
 
Content is king guys for penguin 2.0

i am using tapatalk
 
I think that it is a new step into fighting blog network that are sending links to irrelevant niches, or sape links from irrelevant niches.

At least we could say that they can detect this type of irrelevance, and that they might be embed it in the next penguin. Or not.
 
A friend of mine just got this... so it does look interesting.

Still nothing on any of my clients but this is just the beginning.
 
We have to wait..I haven't seen others getting these warning..we don't know if its one off or mass emails..remembered last penguin..1000s of mass warning messages sent..if this is penguine2.0 ..we should see more people complainig
 
I got slapped, but I also built 50k backlinks to a new site in a low competition niche, lolz.
Just testing bro.
 
ohmahgawd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! run for the hills!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Good old cutts must have a right laugh to himself when he reads these threads and the multitude of hurr durr threads that are set to pop up over the next wile. That warning is nothing new I've come across it before I doubt it has anything to do with matts furry animal 2000.000 update. The sooner this update with all the bullshit to follow is over and we can get back to work the better.
 
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/unnatural-link-warnings-blog-networks-advice

This is not a new message at all....
 
What a stupid fucking thread...you saw the message in the other thread that this message was not a new message and yet you still go on to post a new thread.
 
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/unnatural-link-warnings-blog-networks-advice

This is not a new message at all....


Interesting post..


The identifying marks of a blog network post are as follows:


  1. [*=left]Terrible content and a boring template; you find yourself asking, "Why would anyone ever subscribe to this blog?"
    [*=left]Topics are jumped, unrelated to the site's theme, and categorization is poor.
    [*=left]There is rarely an about section, author name, or means of contact.
    [*=left]Lots and lots of exact-match anchor text seemingly pointing to sites at random.
    [*=left]Posts tend to be 400-500 words with 2-3 links per post - generally all to the same site.
 
Retardness, retardness everywhere..

Just because they changed the wording of the message does not mean they released a whole new update.

Matt Cuts talked not more than a week ago that they'll be releasing the updates in the next few months, why are you in a hurry?
 
Back
Top