is karma real or what?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertise on BHW
speedyallan77 said:
becoz such things don't exist to give u a data to analyze lol.

it's just like saying
"hey buddy i saw a dragon in my backyard then it disappeared"

i mean bro you tell me dragons don't exist, but man i swear that i saw it in my backyard, but i dont have evidence to prove it
Click to expand...
Enjoy!!
 
You can't believe in karma unless you believe in reincarnation, as they're two sides of the same coin.

Then you'd have to believe in astrology and an integral septenary division of nature too.

Also there different types of karma - three main types; sanchita, prarabhda and agami.

Getting any evidence depends in what 'Scientific evidence' means to you. Believe it or not, there are different models of science.

Karma is an age old notion that is a fundamental principle of older, more holistic models of science that were based on deductive reasoning (as opposed to the inductive processes of the 'modern' scientific method).
But unless you want to spend a significant amount of time learning sanskrit and tibetan and studying vedic science and buddhist sutras to gain a substantial understanding of karma as a principle of nature, forget about it. Nobody is going to spoonfeed you anything, they have no reason to.
 
Hanzo_AA said:
You can't believe in karma unless you believe in reincarnation, as they're two sides of the same coin.

Then you'd have to believe in astrology and an integral septenary division of nature too.

Also there different types of karma - three main types; sanchita, prarabhda and agami.

Getting any evidence depends in what 'Scientific evidence' means to you. Believe it or not, there are different models of science.

Karma is an age old notion that is a fundamental principle of older, more holistic models of science that were based on deductive reasoning (as opposed to the inductive processes of the 'modern' scientific method).
But unless you want to spend a significant amount of time learning sanskrit and tibetan and studying vedic science and buddhist sutras to gain a substantial understanding of karma as a principle of nature, forget about it. Nobody is going to spoonfeed you anything, they have no reason to.
Click to expand...
there is only one science when it comes to what is accepted by the scientific authority.
modern science is based in empirical evidence. you make a claim. provide evidence, simple.

pseudo science or scientists who believe in supernatural and other nonsense cannot be accepted as real scientists into the proper scientific community because there is no evidence or prove such things exist.


in science it's all about evidence. there is no such thing as "belief", it's based on empirical observable evidence with repeatable results.

many modern people i have debated with don't even understand the basic principles of science. in the sense they keep bringing up stuff like, "scientists that believe in metaphysics or supernatural etc "

thing is such stuff or scientists are not accepted into the scientific community today coz they don't have any evidence to support their claims. every scientist who makes a claim will be challenged to prove whatever he says with evidence. just watch people like Lawrence krauss, Richards Dawkins on youtube. you will get what i mean. they are examples of real scientists, not the pseudo scientists
 
speedyallan77 said:
there is only one science when it comes to what is accepted by the scientific authority.
modern science is based in empirical evidence. you make a claim. provide evidence, simple.

pseudo science or scientists who believe in supernatural and other nonsense cannot be accepted as real scientists into the proper scientific community because there is no evidence or prove such things exist.


in science it's all about evidence. there is no such thing as "belief", it's based on empirical observable evidence with repeatable results.

many modern people i have debated with don't even understand the basic principles of science. in the sense they keep bringing up stuff like, "scientists that believe in metaphysics or supernatural etc "

thing is such stuff or scientists are not accepted into the scientific community today coz they don't have any evidence to support their claims. every scientist who makes a claim will be challenged to prove whatever he says with evidence. just watch people like Lawrence krauss, Richards Dawkins on youtube. you will get what i mean. they are examples of real scientists, not the pseudo scientists
Click to expand...

Yes modern science is based on repetition but do you honestly feel the repetition and further lines of enquiry are a selfless search for truth? Or something that’s largely degenerated into a system that picks and chooses what to promote and bring to the forefront of publishing based on what is most profitable; can be economised best? Academia and modern science are funded by big business. Deal with it.

Edit: I tried to find an article about Dawkins that said he's basically not a scientist but a ‘religiophobic’ madman with the gift of gab who’s mission is to destroy organised religion. I couldn’t find it but here’s some more trouble he found....
criticised and condemned by scientists themselves for misrepresenting modern science and criticising religion beyond reason
www.independent.co.uk/news/science/richard-dawkins-atheism-criticism-atheist-study-rice-university-science-scientists-a7389396.html

But according to you none of these people are real scientists then because they disagree with you and what ‘real scientists’ are right ;)

Of any number of thinkers and you pick the most controversial, self-aggrandizing, sociopath who’s rise to fame was for relentless criticism of all things spiritual or of god, rather than any actualy constructive discovery or achievement, fo represent your point of view. It speaks for itself actually. This is starting to look more like an emotional dilemma than an intellectual debate.
 
Last edited:
It's real not because of MAGIC or some other nonsense

It's real because YOU ARE what you REPEATEDLY DO - character matters

So? The way you think impacts your emotional framing of the world and this impacts your decisions which produce your reality.

Simplified: Your thoughts are the CAUSES and your LIFE is the EFFECT

Cause and effect will always be true
 
I would have to agree with this, you choose which vibrational plain you wish to dwell on and the universe responds :)
 
Luck is 100% real.
Karma is just a conspiracy theory, to avoid bad doings they started this movement.

In reality the real version of karma is called "cause and effect" in physics.
 
aman khattar said:
Don't mix researches,statistics and science into all this,this is a Universe thing and it cannot be put into statistics.
Click to expand...
Lol the universe you talking about is all in there in "physics".
"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" or the law of "cause and effect". Karma is just an another mass taught fake theory which has no proof unlike physics.
 
Karma is a Sanskrit Word.
It means work.

And Fal means result.

So according to your karma you'll get Fal.

It's simple. If you do good work you'll get good result. If you do bad work you'll suffer in future.

So Veda, Geeta and other Hindu scriptures suggests to do Good Karma. ( Good Work)
 
Advertise on BHW
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top