drahcirwalsh
Newbie
- Oct 4, 2014
- 12
- 3
I am in the process of starting a new web development firm, and I'll be sending out my first few invcs later this weekend. I was curious about the methods that some of you use to collect pymt for your web svcs.
With my first company, when I was young, stupid, and horrendously underpaid I would charge one-off for my svcs. Half down and half upon completion. It probably goes without saying, but I just ended up with a lot of half-paid invcs. Then when I acquired a hardware repair firm we reorganized and devoted a person to managing invcs full time. We tightened the contracts, required a retainer, spent more on legal, and charged per hour, invcing monthly. We were still undercharging, but the money was in the bank. I sold out of that firm over the summer and I'm starting another web dev firm.
As I'm now back to a one man operation (contracting all work out) I was considering using a new model, and I'm hoping to get some feedback. I closed on three projects this week, so now I'm building out the contracts. I intend to invc for 50% of the estimated project csts, and then bill every hour worked at 32.50, invcd biweekly. In essence, when everything is complete, I will have billed at 65/hour. I'm hoping that this will help mitigate risk.
All clients have agreed to this without much question, and I think that it might be a decent way to mitigate loss if a client decides to drop the project. Most of my contractors are pd between 18-25/hour so I still have a little profit from the down pymt alone.
Have any of you used a method like this before? What are your thoughts?
Also, how should I handle project scope expansions later on? I was thinking of treating them as separate projects invcd in a similar way.
And lastly, what is your average monthly service charge for SEO and site maintenance?
Thanks for any feedback!
(The auto moderation bot for new members is intense...)
With my first company, when I was young, stupid, and horrendously underpaid I would charge one-off for my svcs. Half down and half upon completion. It probably goes without saying, but I just ended up with a lot of half-paid invcs. Then when I acquired a hardware repair firm we reorganized and devoted a person to managing invcs full time. We tightened the contracts, required a retainer, spent more on legal, and charged per hour, invcing monthly. We were still undercharging, but the money was in the bank. I sold out of that firm over the summer and I'm starting another web dev firm.
As I'm now back to a one man operation (contracting all work out) I was considering using a new model, and I'm hoping to get some feedback. I closed on three projects this week, so now I'm building out the contracts. I intend to invc for 50% of the estimated project csts, and then bill every hour worked at 32.50, invcd biweekly. In essence, when everything is complete, I will have billed at 65/hour. I'm hoping that this will help mitigate risk.
All clients have agreed to this without much question, and I think that it might be a decent way to mitigate loss if a client decides to drop the project. Most of my contractors are pd between 18-25/hour so I still have a little profit from the down pymt alone.
Have any of you used a method like this before? What are your thoughts?
Also, how should I handle project scope expansions later on? I was thinking of treating them as separate projects invcd in a similar way.
And lastly, what is your average monthly service charge for SEO and site maintenance?
Thanks for any feedback!
(The auto moderation bot for new members is intense...)