Indexing through Web 2.0
- Thread starter fb3003
- Start date
FatBee
Elite Member
- Apr 4, 2015
- 3,146
- 3,098
Yes, but for me it is really spammy.
- Mar 30, 2018
- 12,091
- 14,356
Use paid link indexer those work, and big g won’t like this so play it safe
- Mar 21, 2013
- 24,764
- 31,552
I think they're preparing a big update because indexing has broken again.
Maybe it's not an issue with your 2.0
Maybe it's not an issue with your 2.0
FatBee
Elite Member
- Apr 4, 2015
- 3,146
- 3,098
What you trying ti say:
Big update is on the way, hold tight boys. It will be amazing, huge ranking boosts like every other update!
D
Deleted member 657006
Guest
You can use a parasite that indexed relating to your niche, add a comment drop the URL.
Soon get added to google.
You can ping the parasite link where your post sitting might make quicker indexing.
Paid indexing the real solution .
Soon get added to google.
You can ping the parasite link where your post sitting might make quicker indexing.
Paid indexing the real solution .
fb3003
Elite Member
- Aug 14, 2015
- 5,035
- 3,500
thanks for the response. may i know when was the last time you used this process? also, once you added your new links to your existing web 2.0, did you do the regular sharing on social media for that web 2.0 or just relied on normal google indexing?
fb3003
Elite Member
- Aug 14, 2015
- 5,035
- 3,500
social media sharing is not broken. a similar pdf article was shared on social media and it showed up in google index within 24 hours; but not using the web 2.0 method.
FatBee
Elite Member
- Apr 4, 2015
- 3,146
- 3,098
~1 Month, I leave it as it is, just creating another page with nonsense text and blasting it with shit links
natalia1985
Registered Member
- Jun 29, 2017
- 56
- 29
LOL! This is something i have doing for last 5 years and still it does. pumping it with gsa even more better
- Mar 21, 2013
- 24,764
- 31,552
That's interesting. They got different indexers for pdf and html then.
