- Aug 16, 2023
- 348
- 62
It's been a long time since I used RANKERX.
However, as shown in the photo, only about half of the 40 site lists are successful.
It's a pity that there are many good sites that fail.
What should I do about sites that don't even list the reasons for failure?
I have almost 100% completed the settings required for RANKERX, including proxy, captcha, indexing, and comprehensive email.
Additionally, I have a question: Is it recommended to only use premium WEB2.0 blogs on RANKERX?
I wonder if the premium WEB2.0 profile is also useful.

However, as shown in the photo, only about half of the 40 site lists are successful.
It's a pity that there are many good sites that fail.
What should I do about sites that don't even list the reasons for failure?
I have almost 100% completed the settings required for RANKERX, including proxy, captcha, indexing, and comprehensive email.
Additionally, I have a question: Is it recommended to only use premium WEB2.0 blogs on RANKERX?
I wonder if the premium WEB2.0 profile is also useful.
