How many articles to put on tier 1 web 2.0 ?

jake3340

jake3340

Supreme Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
1,446
Reaction score
442
So i'm in the process of building tier 1 and I was wondering how many articles should I post on each web 2.0 ?

I was thinking of keeping this as my strategy.

4 Web 2.0 article submission sites
10 Social Bookmark
2 Video Submission
2 Doc sharing.

Can I just post 4 unique articles on each web 2.0 or should I create around 20 article and post 1 every few days on each web 2.0 and only put my link once in one random article I post on each ?

I can't seem to figure out this tier 1 process well.

The keyword I am targeting pops up on my local google extension with very little competition. The top 3 sites have almost no backlinks to maybe 5 maximum ones. I wan't to build something and make it stick there.
 
Advertise on BHW
Yeah give a try with unique content !!!

Posted via Topify on Android
 
But how many should I post on each web2.0 what strategy should I take ?
 
4-5 at least. And don't put the same number of articles on every web 2.0. Vary the number a bit. Similarly, do not set them to autopost on the same time or the same day of the week. The idea is to not leave any sort of a footprint. The more random your web 2.0s seem, the safer you will be. It should not look like the same person made all of them.
 
jake3340 said:
But how many should I post on each web2.0 what strategy should I take ?
Click to expand...

You do not want the same amount of articles on each Web 2.0 linking into your site... that is a no-no for a long term strategy.

4 is a nice number but you actually want some with only one article and some with 8 articles... some with images and some without images, some with a video and some without.

The doc shares, social bookmarks, etc are all good to toss in the mix as well.

There really is no exact strategy so you will have to move along and see what is making YOUR site move as you progress.

Forgot to add... do not tier every link to your site... leave some without any tiers at all. Sometimes ineffective SEO is effective as part of one's overall strategy..
 
Spot on advice by Greg!

Mixing things up in every possible way is the key to todays seo.

BassTrackerBoats said:
You do not want the same amount of articles on each Web 2.0 linking into your site... that is a no-no for a long term strategy.

4 is a nice number but you actually want some with only one article and some with 8 articles... some with images and some without images, some with a video and some without.

The doc shares, social bookmarks, etc are all good to toss in the mix as well.

There really is no exact strategy so you will have to move along and see what is making YOUR site move as you progress.

Forgot to add... do not tier every link to your site... leave some without any tiers at all. Sometimes ineffective SEO is effective as part of one's overall strategy..
Click to expand...
 
BassTrackerBoats said:
You do not want the same amount of articles on each Web 2.0 linking into your site... that is a no-no for a long term strategy.

4 is a nice number but you actually want some with only one article and some with 8 articles... some with images and some without images, some with a video and some without.

The doc shares, social bookmarks, etc are all good to toss in the mix as well.

There really is no exact strategy so you will have to move along and see what is making YOUR site move as you progress.

Forgot to add... do not tier every link to your site... leave some without any tiers at all. Sometimes ineffective SEO is effective as part of one's overall strategy..
Click to expand...

Thank for advanced advice !
 
BassTrackerBoats said:
You do not want the same amount of articles on each Web 2.0 linking into your site... that is a no-no for a long term strategy.

4 is a nice number but you actually want some with only one article and some with 8 articles... some with images and some without images, some with a video and some without.

The doc shares, social bookmarks, etc are all good to toss in the mix as well.

There really is no exact strategy so you will have to move along and see what is making YOUR site move as you progress.

Forgot to add... do not tier every link to your site... leave some without any tiers at all. Sometimes ineffective SEO is effective as part of one's overall strategy..
Click to expand...

The height of paranoia! Google doesn't pay any attention to all these things mentioned by you. Tell me, how does the number of articles on a web 2.0 blog affect rankings??? So much misinformation, so little members to debunk them.
 
SEO Power said:
The height of paranoia! Google doesn't pay any attention to all these things mentioned by you. Tell me, how does the number of articles on a web 2.0 blog affect rankings??? So much misinformation, so little members to debunk them.
Click to expand...
Just wow. You sure know something about SEO.

@OP, just read BTB post. That's your answer.
 
I don't know the exact numbers of how much, but I usually post 10-15 articles per web2.0 .
 
SEO Power said:
The height of paranoia! Google doesn't pay any attention to all these things mentioned by you. Tell me, how does the number of articles on a web 2.0 blog affect rankings??? So much misinformation, so little members to debunk them.
Click to expand...

To help out those that have two accounts here on BHW, and others that may not understand why I stated what I stated above, I'll explain why I say what I say about the backlinks one has linked to their site.

If all your backlinks are identical as to the amount of content, Image SEO, videos with links, etc, then there is going to be a footprint. That has been in play since about 2009 or so.

If you have a variety of backlinks, with differing amount of content, different pages linking in, different <insert any variable>, then you will have different link juice strength as well as not building a footprint backlinking infrastructure with the exact same process each and every time you link to your site.

Here is an example (simple but extrapolate it out for yourself):

Your site, domain.com has 100 pages.

You backlink each of those pages with the exact same link types that are all the same amount of content, pages, have the same # of images that are using similar or the same Image SEO, all have videos... pretty much just are replicated in most respects, you are going to build one big fat giant footprint.

On the other hand, should you mix up the kinds of backlinks, the amount of content on those backlinks, the amount of pages from those backlinked sites, images, videos, etc, you are going to keep thing from looking contrived and like you are trying to game Google and thus not leave a footprint.

I'm not a genius, in fact I'm not all that smart, but I do have the time and team to test, and scenario 2 is 100 times better, long term, to rank a site and keep it ranked.
 
BassTrackerBoats said:
To help out those that have two accounts here on BHW, and others that may not understand why I stated what I stated above, I'll explain why I say what I say about the backlinks one has linked to their site.

If all your backlinks are identical as to the amount of content, Image SEO, videos with links, etc, then there is going to be a footprint. That has been in play since about 2009 or so.

If you have a variety of backlinks, with differing amount of content, different pages linking in, different <insert any variable>, then you will have different link juice strength as well as not building a footprint backlinking infrastructure with the exact same process each and every time you link to your site.

Here is an example (simple but extrapolate it out for yourself):

Your site, domain.com has 100 pages.

You backlink each of those pages with the exact same link types that are all the same amount of content, pages, have the same # of images that are using similar or the same Image SEO, all have videos... pretty much just are replicated in most respects, you are going to build one big fat giant footprint.

On the other hand, should you mix up the kinds of backlinks, the amount of content on those backlinks, the amount of pages from those backlinked sites, images, videos, etc, you are going to keep thing from looking contrived and like you are trying to game Google and thus not leave a footprint.

I'm not a genius, in fact I'm not all that smart, but I do have the time and team to test, and scenario 2 is 100 times better, long term, to rank a site and keep it ranked.
Click to expand...

You speculate too much, and I still maintain that all that has nothing do with how well a site ranks. You are talking about footprints as though a PBN was involved.

Btw, Keep mentioning "two accounts" as many times as you want. I'm "in the clear" with the moderators and that's all that matters.

Boriss said:
Just wow. You sure know something about SEO.

@OP, just read BTB post. That's your answer.
Click to expand...

I won't waste my time on noobs who think they are smarter.
 
BassTrackerBoats said:
You do not want the same amount of articles on each Web 2.0 linking into your site... that is a no-no for a long term strategy.

4 is a nice number but you actually want some with only one article and some with 8 articles... some with images and some without images, some with a video and some without.

The doc shares, social bookmarks, etc are all good to toss in the mix as well.

There really is no exact strategy so you will have to move along and see what is making YOUR site move as you progress.

Forgot to add... do not tier every link to your site... leave some without any tiers at all. Sometimes ineffective SEO is effective as part of one's overall strategy..
Click to expand...

Thank's for the post BassTracker, I'm Completely agree with you, even i'm also using the the same method as you mentioned here to post content's in web 2.0's. one more thing in your post i really appriciate, is to not tiering every link in the money site..
 
Last edited:
3 articles, 1 about-us page and 1 contact us page. Custom images for articles, Logo for web 2.0. It would be super web 2.0 which is very effective.

Thanks
 
SEO Power said:
You speculate too much,
Click to expand...

But it is not speculation... we test over here. I am not sharing some ethereal theory that may or may not exist. I have a full team that does R&D on a regular basis as we provide SEO services to thousands and it is reality, not speculation.

For whatever reason you want to "debunk" my theories but they are not theories, they are what we have tested.

If it was theory I would not share it.
 
There's no rule book on how to approach this. Just diversify and make everythin as unique as possible.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top