How many 2.0 buffer sites are good for ranking at the beginning?
- Thread starter keeping
- Start date
JonnyBorneo
Regular Member
- Feb 7, 2012
- 388
- 97
answer depends on your competition that's all
how many backlinks does the #1 for your keyword have? DA? PR? Authority?
answer those question for yourself then you know
how many backlinks does the #1 for your keyword have? DA? PR? Authority?
answer those question for yourself then you know
Smart SEO
Senior Member
- Apr 17, 2011
- 857
- 760
Depends on the type of site and competition.
For a micro niche site, 10 HIGH QUALITY Web 2.0's should be enough to rank to at least top 5.
For a site with harder competition 70-200 sites will be plenty but remember they must be high quality. Spend more time on backlink quality than website quality haha sounds stupid but trust me.
Oh and dont forget to blast the absolute shit out of those web 2.0's using any spam tool you have, Senuke, scrapebox, amr etc etc.
Good luck
For a micro niche site, 10 HIGH QUALITY Web 2.0's should be enough to rank to at least top 5.
For a site with harder competition 70-200 sites will be plenty but remember they must be high quality. Spend more time on backlink quality than website quality haha sounds stupid but trust me.
Oh and dont forget to blast the absolute shit out of those web 2.0's using any spam tool you have, Senuke, scrapebox, amr etc etc.
Good luck
ContentCreation
BANNED
- Apr 29, 2011
- 513
- 249
Quick question - Shall I build separate web 2.0's for each article/keyword on my site? You say you may need 10 for small competition, is that just for the main keyword??
If I have a site with 50 articles on, will I need to create X amount of web 2.0's for each article (each article targeting 1 keyword)
If I have a site with 50 articles on, will I need to create X amount of web 2.0's for each article (each article targeting 1 keyword)
D
Deleted member 278477
Guest
I am going to be using about 10 web 2.0s per keyword/page for my MNS...can't say if that's ideal or not as I haven't been around long enough to draw any conclusions...
I had a question to though...I only have scrapebox to blast the 2.0's is it ok to only use 1 type of blast or is that going to be less effective?
Stupid Smurf
Regular Member
- Dec 12, 2011
- 337
- 143
This might seem like a total n00b question.. but what do you mean by web 2.0 sites? I imagine these aren't sites you made, would get expensive. Are these social type sites where you can make a page and you then link it to your article?
ContentCreation
BANNED
- Apr 29, 2011
- 513
- 249
Yup! They are also known as buffer sites, and they are basically small sites which are typically made on free blogging platforms. People tend to use old, rehashed content for the buffer sites, but since Google have been cracking down on quality, the content is best off being uniquely written .. Once the content is added and the buffer sites look good, you can then blast them with tons of backlinks to increase the link juice it passes on to your site, when you decide to link to it.
Search for a member named phpbuilt, he has a long list of good Web 2.0's to use!
Last edited:
oscarmike
Regular Member
- Sep 16, 2011
- 237
- 45
Hi bro, heres the list of web2.0 sites as compiled by phpbuilt.
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...45-new-web2-0-blog-list-over-100-updated.html
blackhawk12
Registered Member
- Oct 18, 2010
- 72
- 5
How many web 2.0 sites are really there? 500+ I did download everything from there & some of them were dead actually.
livapetr
Regular Member
- Oct 17, 2009
- 251
- 51
HI,
- What do you mean by "harder competition" ? Intitle:"" of 10K ?
- Web2.0 (meant here) is essentially a one page, right?
- Is it necessary to get totally different and new text for every web2.0 or one well spun chunk is ok?
Thanks/