Quick question - Shall I build separate web 2.0's for each article/keyword on my site? You say you may need 10 for small competition, is that just for the main keyword??
If I have a site with 50 articles on, will I need to create X amount of web 2.0's for each article (each article targeting 1 keyword)
This might seem like a total n00b question.. but what do you mean by web 2.0 sites? I imagine these aren't sites you made, would get expensive. Are these social type sites where you can make a page and you then link it to your article?I am going to be using about 10 web 2.0s per keyword/page for my MNS...can't say if that's ideal or not as I haven't been around long enough to draw any conclusions...
I had a question to though...I only have scrapebox to blast the 2.0's is it ok to only use 1 type of blast or is that going to be less effective?
This might seem like a total n00b question.. but what do you mean by web 2.0 sites? I imagine these aren't sites you made, would get expensive. Are these social type sites where you can make a page and you then link it to your article?
This might seem like a total n00b question.. but what do you mean by web 2.0 sites? I imagine these aren't sites you made, would get expensive. Are these social type sites where you can make a page and you then link it to your article?
Hi bro, heres the list of web2.0 sites as compiled by phpbuilt.
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...45-new-web2-0-blog-list-over-100-updated.html
Depends on the type of site and competition.
For a micro niche site, 10 HIGH QUALITY Web 2.0's should be enough to rank to at least top 5.
For a site with harder competition 70-200 sites will be plenty but remember they must be high quality. Spend more time on backlink quality than website quality haha sounds stupid but trust me.
Oh and dont forget to blast the absolute shit out of those web 2.0's using any spam tool you have, Senuke, scrapebox, amr etc etc.
Good luck