Further, he doesn't think
That is for sure!
We're all anonymous (less or more) so he could be anybody. Maybe your neighbor.
Take care, he might know everything about you
Maybe you're his wife?
Dude. What have you been smoking?
Not your dude, dude - I don't smoke, what did you smoke?
When did simple math become 'thoughts'?
Funny shit right there.
It's not a simple math, it's your assumption, but the world doesn't rotate on your assumptions.
Dose simple math offend you?
No, why are you in defensive stance? We all make mistakes, even in math.
Even if OP claims are real and you add the simple math I outlined, what conclusion can you draw about that company/project?
I can come to a conclusion that you might be wrong. Did it ever cross your mind?
If' you're so good with math...can I find you in forbes...or sweeping floors?
Can you at least accept that, if OP is genuine, it is very likely the project is a scam or they have incompetent coders and management that are giving rewards hundreds of times higher than is able to pull any decent crypto miner.
No, but I can accept that you might not know everything, I can accept that you never tried it, and I can accept that he might be lucky.
On another note, if you consider gaining $30k (real or not) a success, we must not use the same dictionary. But that is the last problem that we can argue about.
Yes, I consider it is a success, don't you? (Of course you say you won't as you make $50k an hour).
If your assumptions was right about my feelings about someone else success, I wouldn't be on bhw reading the money making or journey section. That is bad health for any envious man. And surely I wouldn't share anything that is useful for me with others, here, for the past 11 years. Why the heck would I want others to use what I know for their gain. F%^$ em. Right?
Come on.
'Were' would be correct as it is plural, but grammar aside, I do not assume, I am saying it is a success to get $30k a week. Would you mind $30k per week? I think this is exact reason why you are on the forum looking for money making section - because you are not successful (yet) or not as successful as you want to be, otherwise, why would you? 11 years a long time, yet you still here.
For the fun of argument, my profile is public and you can check my entire posting history. Surely, I am not the most valuable member, but I surely have a fair amount of useful comment.
Thats very humble of you!
On other another note... if you think only crypto billionaires, Forbes celebrities, network and site owner of xxxx site are 'right' and all the rest can't do simple math.... well... I don't see us able to have an argument based conversation.
Hm...I never said that right? You assumed that I said that and your "train of thought" went in the direction base don your assumption, but this assumption might have nothing to do with the reality...as you assume you're always right. Right?
I don't see how we can have argument based conversation when your arguments based on the assumptions you make for other people.