eM.
Newbie
- Oct 2, 2019
- 6
- 4
Hello mates,
I'm reading that forum for about 2 years right now, but I've never needed an account - until now.
Yesterday I was doing some research and I've found that "tawk.to" company. At first it looked like they got hit by a last google core update, but I've started to dig. And I've found that they've lots of spammy, low quality, user-generated pages with content like movies, games hacks and even abortion pills (with photos of fetuses!). People (bots?) are using https://tawk.to/example, to produce that kind of content. For e.g. https://tawk.to/downloadioveyou3000mp3.
According to ahrefs that domain had a stabile growth for over a year even with pages like that!
The only tricky thing that I've found is that all of the tawk.to company (product) content is on "https://www" (with "no www"->"www" redirect), and all the spammy content is on "https://" (with "www"->"no www" redirect).
How is that possible that they are not banned yet, hell they are even growing!? Any ideas? I was analyzing that for the whole day and I can't see any simple answers.
I'm reading that forum for about 2 years right now, but I've never needed an account - until now.
Yesterday I was doing some research and I've found that "tawk.to" company. At first it looked like they got hit by a last google core update, but I've started to dig. And I've found that they've lots of spammy, low quality, user-generated pages with content like movies, games hacks and even abortion pills (with photos of fetuses!). People (bots?) are using https://tawk.to/example, to produce that kind of content. For e.g. https://tawk.to/downloadioveyou3000mp3.
According to ahrefs that domain had a stabile growth for over a year even with pages like that!
The only tricky thing that I've found is that all of the tawk.to company (product) content is on "https://www" (with "no www"->"www" redirect), and all the spammy content is on "https://" (with "www"->"no www" redirect).
How is that possible that they are not banned yet, hell they are even growing!? Any ideas? I was analyzing that for the whole day and I can't see any simple answers.