Hi!
Have you heard of CPA cc submit Blank Checkout or Sweepstakes offers? These are based on recurring payments like 1 usd initially and 49 usd every 2 weeks until the subscription is canceled.
The customer arrives from an affiliate website (website A) to this payment landing page (cpa offer - website B) where they enter their card details. Basically this page is from a legitimate looking website, such as a website selling a fitness program with paid membership.
Basically, the payment processor sees that a user went to website B and bought from there, doesn't know that he was actually sent from website A directly to the checkout page from website B and didn't know what he bought.
After he makes the initial payment of 1 usd, he will receive or not (on a case by case basis) the content that the affiliate site promised.
Given the business model, it certainly generates a lot of chargebacks. Users try to pay for something on website A but in fact they will get a personalized fitness program from website B, or in the worst case they will get nothing. Afterwards they will be billed every 2 weeks with 49 usd until they cancel the subscription.
In most cases users don't know how to cancel this subscription because they don't know the website B on which the payment was made and don't know how to reach them on the website to cancel. Thus, they have to request a chargeback from the bank.
So the percentage of chargebacks in this business model is probably huge, maybe even over 10% of the number of payments.
My question is: how do the owners of these websites manage such a large number of chargebacks? But how do payment processors accept such practices? I knew that more than 1% chargebacks will ban your account.
Have you heard of CPA cc submit Blank Checkout or Sweepstakes offers? These are based on recurring payments like 1 usd initially and 49 usd every 2 weeks until the subscription is canceled.
The customer arrives from an affiliate website (website A) to this payment landing page (cpa offer - website B) where they enter their card details. Basically this page is from a legitimate looking website, such as a website selling a fitness program with paid membership.
Basically, the payment processor sees that a user went to website B and bought from there, doesn't know that he was actually sent from website A directly to the checkout page from website B and didn't know what he bought.
After he makes the initial payment of 1 usd, he will receive or not (on a case by case basis) the content that the affiliate site promised.
Given the business model, it certainly generates a lot of chargebacks. Users try to pay for something on website A but in fact they will get a personalized fitness program from website B, or in the worst case they will get nothing. Afterwards they will be billed every 2 weeks with 49 usd until they cancel the subscription.
In most cases users don't know how to cancel this subscription because they don't know the website B on which the payment was made and don't know how to reach them on the website to cancel. Thus, they have to request a chargeback from the bank.
So the percentage of chargebacks in this business model is probably huge, maybe even over 10% of the number of payments.
My question is: how do the owners of these websites manage such a large number of chargebacks? But how do payment processors accept such practices? I knew that more than 1% chargebacks will ban your account.