Deja,
yes .... my site structure is as you mentioned as in >> MamasItalianBakery.com/italianbiscottis.html so on and so forth in Pyramid fashion from broad to long tail kw's as far as site structure.
But I suppose what I'm driving at is how this might work with an Ecommerce site when there are literally 100's keywords that I can be ranking for.
I understand how perhaps it may be easier for an affiliate marketer to tackle this for an affilliate product for something like weight loss as that is the 1 particular keyword that somebody is typing in for the affilliate to concentrate on. Altough that is a tough one to even consider tackling.
What I mean is....I always think that perhaps when it comes to affiliate stuff you primarily have a small number of keywords to think about.
But I'm still trying to wrap my head around how I could tackle this using this approach when I have 10 Main-Categories with 4-5 sub-Categories within those main Categories selling products. Meaning that I have numerous keywords that I could be ranking for given my niche.
Should I just do this for let's say all of the keywords that pertain to my website which could naturally run into the 100's but focus on the ones that are the more profitable.
My best competitors ranking #1 and #2 are very Savvy SEO guys from a high paying Forum with plenty of backlinks to boot.
So besides trying to compete there....does this even make sense for me to do this for those keywords via this approach?
==== ====
AfterShock2020,
It appears that the more relevant info would be the backlinks as evidenced in Yahoo.
But I'm always left daunted with the task of thinking of approaching and keeping track of 100's if not 1000's of webmasters for a link.
I remember a nifty tool that could be accessed online that showed the common thread of websites that was linking back to any # of websites you wanted to do a comparison for so that you could easily glance to see which were the common site(s) your competitors were getting links from.
Gotta see if I can dig that up and share it.
++
Keep it going boys and thanks to the both of ya.
It's somewhat brandable I guess, but it really sucks for SEO, unless you're going to break it down into subdomains or a directory structure based on your keywords like mib.com/pastries or biscotti.mib.com or whatever.
yes .... my site structure is as you mentioned as in >> MamasItalianBakery.com/italianbiscottis.html so on and so forth in Pyramid fashion from broad to long tail kw's as far as site structure.
But I suppose what I'm driving at is how this might work with an Ecommerce site when there are literally 100's keywords that I can be ranking for.
I understand how perhaps it may be easier for an affiliate marketer to tackle this for an affilliate product for something like weight loss as that is the 1 particular keyword that somebody is typing in for the affilliate to concentrate on. Altough that is a tough one to even consider tackling.
What I mean is....I always think that perhaps when it comes to affiliate stuff you primarily have a small number of keywords to think about.
But I'm still trying to wrap my head around how I could tackle this using this approach when I have 10 Main-Categories with 4-5 sub-Categories within those main Categories selling products. Meaning that I have numerous keywords that I could be ranking for given my niche.
Should I just do this for let's say all of the keywords that pertain to my website which could naturally run into the 100's but focus on the ones that are the more profitable.
My best competitors ranking #1 and #2 are very Savvy SEO guys from a high paying Forum with plenty of backlinks to boot.
So besides trying to compete there....does this even make sense for me to do this for those keywords via this approach?
==== ====
AfterShock2020,
$ Go to ' popuri.us ' and compare your stats against those competitors.
$ Click on the resulting links and each of your competition's backlinks for each of those services listed will be revealed to you.
$ Add as many of these backlinking sites to your site as possible ...
It appears that the more relevant info would be the backlinks as evidenced in Yahoo.
But I'm always left daunted with the task of thinking of approaching and keeping track of 100's if not 1000's of webmasters for a link.
I remember a nifty tool that could be accessed online that showed the common thread of websites that was linking back to any # of websites you wanted to do a comparison for so that you could easily glance to see which were the common site(s) your competitors were getting links from.
Gotta see if I can dig that up and share it.
++
Keep it going boys and thanks to the both of ya.
Last edited: