dnt mind my this post...bt i really cldnt find how to create a new thread ...cldnt find any link for that..please guide me...
Lol people really do this, read a thread in another forum and seemed like a lot of people do that. They were sharing stories of bums in there town and how they pay them for there credentials. One person even made passports using the bums info and his picture with the bums help smh. Hate to refer to people as bums though cus no one is really a bum, they are just in a different situation then us. I am curious how it turns out for youMaybe I'll just pay a bum for there info
Is it still ID theft when they willingly give the info?that s identity theft and it s federal offense u can face 2 years in prison so u better off do it on yr own u never what can happen
I think then it's just fraud.Is it still ID theft when they willingly give the info?
I think then it's just fraud.
Yes, i agree, like most blackhat methods theres fraud involved, maybe more then the usual
false for the millionth+ time.. blackhat does not mean fraud.
I dissagree, all blackhat has a degree of fraud, even whitehat IMO .
sorry but your wrong. I dont think you understand what blackhat or whitehat even is then.. or better explain how they are fraud
Common law fraud has nine elements:[SUP]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud#cite_note-5[/SUP][SUP]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud#cite_note-6[/SUP]
Most jurisdictions in the United States require that each element be pled with particularity and be proved with clear, cogent, and convincing evidence (very probable evidence) to establish a claim of fraud. The measure of damages in fraud cases is to be computed by the "benefit of bargain" rule, which is the difference between the value of the property had it been as represented, and its actual value. Special damages may be allowed if shown proximately caused by defendant's fraud and the damage amounts are proved with specificity.
- a representation of an existing fact;
- its materiality;
- its falsity;
- the speaker's knowledge of its falsity;
- the speaker's intent that it shall be acted upon by the plaintiff;
- plaintiff's ignorance of its falsity;
- plaintiff's reliance on the truth of the representation;
- plaintiff's right to rely upon it; and
- consequent damages suffered by plaintiff.
That's fraud according dictionary.com, not any actual legal reference text. In other words, completely irrelevant.
If, according to your philosophy, you see fraud and deception everywhere, write a movie instead of forum posts discussing actual legality.
On a side note, seems like someone's been watching too much Fight Club![]()