Googles algorithm changes seem 100% random?

I'm not saying it's not valid. I am just saying that at any point, any site can become "collateral damage" to an algorithm designed to do the exact opposite. So in theory making shit / time efficient sites may be even more profitable if over time most "white hat" sites get hit eventually.
 
I'm not saying it's not valid. I am just saying that at any point, any site can become "collateral damage" to an algorithm designed to do the exact opposite. So in theory making shit / time efficient sites may be even more profitable if over time most "white hat" sites get hit eventually.

That is so true. +1 from me.
 
Ok so this last update really puzzled me. It was the EMD update and panda/penguin refresh. My niche results went from OK to terrible and still are terrible. Basically first page includes multiple MNS sites that are 1 page emds (for multiple keywords), a few sites with sub 5 backlinks, some sites with no anchor diversity just KEYWORD over and over. Aren't these the exact features google was "banishing"? My site did get slapped like 10 positions yet I had lots of quality back links, anchor diversity, PR 4, rich content 100+ pages, good on site seo. Now I see these 1 page EMD etc out ranking me, or sites with 0 seo and not updated in years. It makes me wonder why I put so much effort in my site getting it to #1 and making it an authority for most of my keywords to get slapped in a update and be out ranked by sites that took 30 mins max to create with virtually 0 SEO.

If it took 30 mins, why didnt you take 3 hrs today to do it 6 times, and make yourself rank in 6 profitable niches? Links are always to be questioned before content. Don't ask questions about the page unless you've thoroughly evaluated their links.
 
I did evaluate their links, basically the reason they appear to be ranking is they own 3+ year old EMD's, that is the only advantage. Their backlink profiles are sub 50 links and sitewides.
 
i had a top 1 "softcore movies" and "softcore" with a great info and review site with no spam links, everything was so clear and minimal with no ads => google decided to remove it and now i see some torrent tags and porn tubes are ranked at top for my keywords. Thanks Google
 
i had a top 1 "softcore movies" and "softcore" with a great info and review site with no spam links, everything was so clear and minimal with no ads => google decided to remove it and now i see some torrent tags and porn tubes are ranked at top for my keywords. Thanks Google

Whats wrong with that? When somebody types a porn related keyword into Google I doubt they do so to read reviews. It seems like Google is giving searchers what they wan't now.
 
Back
Top