mqsss
Regular Member
- Feb 24, 2012
- 454
- 389
Any more news about this?
I started building some MNS sites after a couple of years. All low/medium competition and I see websites with 20 non-relevant PBN links dominating top spots for all important keywords. I have analyzed hundreds of KWs in the past few months and I have seen everything on 1st pages. Low quality sites, low quality PBNs, no diversification, KW stuffing (12%!), and I can't get anywhere near them for almost 3 months. But there's 1 thing in which they are all better than my sites - they are all older than 6 months.
Compared to competition that is dominating 1st pages of Google, I have more diversified links, more unique content than 80% of them, almost everything better by every metric I can think of, and I'm nowhere near page 1.
I know that Google crawls the whole web and indexes sites much faster than Bing. You see that Bing graph? That's how it's supposed to be and that's how it usually was.
When I added few top quality links on a site about 12 months ago, positions in Google bounced few pages up and down for a couple of days, than they got stronger and stayed there. Now when I add 5 top quality links, nothing happens or it all goes to hell.
My homepage is optimized for a specific KW and after I added 5 HQ links few days ago, it went from 7th page directly to hell. Still hasn't recovered, so I really don't know what to do. Some people say it's normal and that 4 months need to pass before I can analyze anything, but I'm getting frustrated.
If Google wanted to kill churn&burn tactics, this is not the way to go. I will probably build 10 more fresh websites in the next couple of weeks with shitloads of content and I will leave them there for 4 months with minimum inbound links until this shit sorts itself.
I started building some MNS sites after a couple of years. All low/medium competition and I see websites with 20 non-relevant PBN links dominating top spots for all important keywords. I have analyzed hundreds of KWs in the past few months and I have seen everything on 1st pages. Low quality sites, low quality PBNs, no diversification, KW stuffing (12%!), and I can't get anywhere near them for almost 3 months. But there's 1 thing in which they are all better than my sites - they are all older than 6 months.
Compared to competition that is dominating 1st pages of Google, I have more diversified links, more unique content than 80% of them, almost everything better by every metric I can think of, and I'm nowhere near page 1.
I know that Google crawls the whole web and indexes sites much faster than Bing. You see that Bing graph? That's how it's supposed to be and that's how it usually was.
When I added few top quality links on a site about 12 months ago, positions in Google bounced few pages up and down for a couple of days, than they got stronger and stayed there. Now when I add 5 top quality links, nothing happens or it all goes to hell.
My homepage is optimized for a specific KW and after I added 5 HQ links few days ago, it went from 7th page directly to hell. Still hasn't recovered, so I really don't know what to do. Some people say it's normal and that 4 months need to pass before I can analyze anything, but I'm getting frustrated.
If Google wanted to kill churn&burn tactics, this is not the way to go. I will probably build 10 more fresh websites in the next couple of weeks with shitloads of content and I will leave them there for 4 months with minimum inbound links until this shit sorts itself.
Attachments
Last edited:
