Google SERPs Domination , The d4l1t0s Theory :)

Whoa dude I read it till 2nd paragraph and apparently you nailed it.

Congratulations.
 
You tend to base this type of analysis upon the particular PAGE you are trying to outrank. Therefore in my view, the answer is as you suspected (No.2). TLD authority is certainly a basis for discussion when discussing outranking a sub page but consider the Amazon example, it is very easy to outrank it should the sub page not carry many links but the TLD has many millions.....

Thank you for confirming this, it actually makes sense to analyze the backlinks of the particular PAGE we are trying to outrank, because if it was for the whole site backlinks, authority sites like Amazon you mentioned or Pornhub(adult niche) would rank for almost any related keyword because of this and that's not happening thank god:p

The reason why I questioned this is, because I've seen many sites which have thousands of backlinks rank #3/4/5 or lower in the SERP-s for a certain keyword when #1/2 sites only have hundreds of backlinks and sometimes only a few ones.(<100)
I believe this is because of other factors right? Such as age of the domain,authority of the site,ON-page SEO,etc...
 
First of all, this thread is very informational for newbies, I see nothing new here, but still contributing is very good:)

I need to ask you a question, I know the answer, but still I'm not sure about it, although the answer is logical and can't be the other one - more below:



Let's assume that for a keyword, for e.x weight loss, if the #1 site ranking for this kw, is the main domain name(for e.x weightloss.com) we will analyze all the backlinks pointing to EVERY PAGE of the site or just the home page?

The same question goes for e.x if a page of a site(weightloss.com/lose-weight) ranks #1 for a kw lose weight for e.x when analyzing backlinks of it, should we analyze the backlinks pointing to the site or just the backlinks pointing to the PAGE which is ranking?

I think it's the 2nd one, but still 2 minds are better than 1, what do you think?

I'm asking this because I found a keyword where a page of an authority site is ranking #1 but the page only has 312 backlinks, while the site has over 1million backlinks:eek:
So according to you, if I make more than 1312 backlinks to my site(1000+) that means I can outrank my competitor?

I beileve that answer number 2 is the right one.
And as ''takeachance'' wrote, the best example to see this is amazon :)
PS: I chose that +1000 backlinks just to be sure that I have more backlinks than my competitor but theoretically if you have +1 backlink than your competitor , you will rank better than him .
 
The quality of the links is huge, you can have thousands of low quality links and your competitor can outrank you with few high quality high pr links.
 
Don't forget about the 'quality' of links - it is not all just about the numbers....

Of course the quality your backlinks is very important as I mentioned on the first post and also you don't need to neglect the on site SEO .
 
Thanks for a very well-written post.

You wrote that you are using:
Magic Article Submitter and Article Demon For submitting
The Best Spinner for spinning Articles

But why do you use all 3 tools? Wouldn't it be enough with Article Demon for spinning and submitting?
 
Thanks for a very well-written post.

You wrote that you are using:


But why do you use all 3 tools? Wouldn't it be enough with Article Demon for spinning and submitting?

Both submitting tools don't have the same articles directories lists .
And for the best spinner . its quality is so far the best when it comes to spinning tool .
 
Some people says that google has changed to ignore the duplicated articles or even the spinned ones. Have you seen any diference in the succes of your strategy the last months?
 
Some people says that google has changed to ignore the duplicated articles or even the spinned ones. Have you seen any diference in the succes of your strategy the last months?

Fact: duplicate articles are a myth. Google never de-emphasized sites with duplicate content in their rankings.
 
Example: You set up a website to sell Call Of Duty 4, and the game is coming in 2 weeks. If you post all your backlinks in one shot, you will likely be dropped far in the serps and you may stay there for 3-4 weeks as well, so you will loose all the traffic coming on the three first days of launch.
Same for clickbank product launches.
Ok, what do you recommend we do then? We post an article/blog about said product 2 weeks in advance and just build a couple links to them? then as time goes on, for about maybe a month, we start building more links ?
 
In my experiences its indeed always better to gradually build backlinks, every week more.

@zellow1006

My experiences with fast campaigns are to blast the shit out of them and to get a top spot asap. Whats the point when you are on page 4 and that wave just passed...
 
Back
Top