Why would you say that a Domain's authority is not a ranking factor?
the domain authority is a ranking factor, just not the fake authority that SEO tools give. Google are using their own internal metrics to assess a domain's authority and - many times - their internal metrics coincide with the metrics of Ahrefs / MOZ. But Ahrefs / MOZ's metrics are NOT a ranking factor, google simply doesn't care if the sites have DR 90 or DR 0, you can oftentimes see sites with low DR / DA outranking sites with high DR / DA. This is what I meant
Regarding article length, I still see longer, relevant articles with a good H1, H2, H3 structure performing well as compared to others. Naturally the content needs to be useful to the user.
still not a ranking factor though.... OK, let's say not an important ranking factor, maybe it does weigh something in the grand scheme of things, but not a lot
When it comes to content length the keyword's intent is arguably the most important part of it, there are keywords (some questions for example) whose intent is just the answer YES or NO, and for such keywords there's no point in writing a lot o content. As a matter of fact there's no point in writing any content at all, you just need to reply with YES or NO, and google does this automatically for those keywords, which is why they're not really good keywords to target for your website.
And the same goes for other type of questions like "time in Melbourne right now", or "when is Eastern in 2024" and so on... All of these keywords require no content to be "fully" addressed, which is why I said that the keyword's intent will decide the length of the content and which is why content length is not a ranking factor....
Although, reading the last paragraph again I can see that you can interpret the "content length is not a ranking factor" in 2 ways lol... But anyway, you know what I meant
