Google page 1 in 24 hours wow!!!

I know English isn't your first language, but surely you've come across the word "mostly" before? It's not a very hard one, but it's worth learning.
You're totally right. I've never heard of this word before. Thank you for enlightening me.
I don't hack and I think hacking is mostly a scummy way of making money because it indiscriminately targets the weakest links in society who tend to me old people that aren't very computer savvy and other normal people just trying to go about their business.
Absolutely irrelevant to the whole topic btw.

I don't get it. Why are you even a member of a forum called "blackhatworld"? Isn't that against all your morals and beliefs?
 
Why are you even a member of a forum called "blackhatworld"?
The "blackhat" in blackhatworld isn't "blackhat hacking".

Just because you might live in a place where the law isn't enforced on hacking doesn't make it legal. Unless you've read the legislation on this method how do you even know if it's legal or not? (which I'm telling you it isn't). Just because it's only target a edu site and not other people doesn't mean it's not hacking.

They were and are my only points. If you have a reason any of those points aren't true, then go at it. But my initial comments weren't about the immorality of hacking, they were around this method being hacking.
 
i hate the fact that people fvck methods up by posting it on here........i find it annoying.

If you see something...do your own research and shut up please.
 
The "blackhat" in blackhatworld isn't "blackhat hacking".

Just because you might live in a place where the law isn't enforced on hacking doesn't make it legal. Unless you've read the legislation on this method how do you even know if it's legal or not? (which I'm telling you it isn't). Just because it's only target a edu site and not other people doesn't mean it's not hacking.

They were and are my only points. If you have a reason any of those points aren't true, then go at it. But my initial comments weren't about the immorality of hacking, they were around this method being hacking.
Fair enough, I respect your points of view.

On another side of things, I don't really like this whole pdf spam going on. It could potentially lead to certain algo updates later on. Also, it's sort of a myth that there are google/social media employees lurking around here, so my guess is that this will soon be over with. We all know what happened with the famous sc method.
 
You're totally right. I've never heard of this word before. Thank you for enlightening me.

Absolutely irrelevant to the whole topic btw.

I don't get it. Why are you even a member of a forum called "blackhatworld"? Isn't that against all your morals and beliefs?
This is not a hacking forum. Its Black Hat World SEO Forum. And @VSYNC is right. Not to mention that hacking is not allowed to discuss here, unless you want this thread locked and warning points.
 
Fair enough, I respect your points of view.

On another side of things, I don't really like this whole pdf spam going on. It could potentially lead to certain algo updates later on. Also, it's sort of a myth that there are google/social media employees lurking around here, so my guess is that this will soon be over with. We all know what happened with the famous sc method.
And looking at this from a completely different angle, it seems that this method might have been something quite valuable that was being used quietly by some members until it got outed here by a few people.

Not worrying about whether it is hacking or isn't hacking (which it is), it's also shit when people carelessly screw with other peoples' businesses by publicly talking about it like this.

It's like when someone is ranking #1 for a keyword and then another member comes on here and creates a thread saying "How is this site ranking for #1, what's their method" and then posts a screenshot of the site and the url, and then people start explaining how someone is doing it - it's really crap and people should be more considerate.

All up this thread was probably a bad idea - it's outside of what is allowed to be discussed on BHW imo, but even aside from that it's screwed over some people on here too. People should think a bit more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All up this thread was probably a bad idea - it's outside of what should be discussed on BHW imo, but even aside from that it's screwed over some people on here too. People should think a bit more.

says the guy bumping the thread lol

ive seen this method but learned way too much about it from this thread, which is nice for me, but the implications are that everyones sites can now be easily pushed out of first page of google

wouldnt have seen this at all if the past few pages werent so active
 
says the guy bumping the thread lol

ive seen this method but learned way too much about it from this thread, which is nice for me, but the implications are that everyones sites can now be easily pushed out of first page of google

wouldnt have seen this at all if the past few pages werent so active
You must have some hacking to do with your new skills mate.

A regular member after 10 years on the site, someone else who's opinion really doesn't matter at all.. can't wait to see your next post in 2022.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They're called conversations and you have them on forums.

Dude if this is you being smart them it's no wonder you're as (un)successful after 10 years on an IM forum as you were when you started and still having to pilfer scammy methods like this.

You want to laugh at something, find a mirror or your bank balance.

This thread really was a magnet for all the geniuses on here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is not a hacking forum. Its Black Hat World SEO Forum. And @VSYNC is right. Not to mention that hacking is not allowed to discuss here, unless you want this thread locked and warning points.
Threads like this should be locked down before they even gain any popularity. Again, same example as the sc method that quickly gained what? Couple of hundred pages in a matter of a few days.
Yeah well you're right. Looking at this from a completely different angle, it seems that this method might have been something quite valuable that was being used quietly by some members until it got outed here by a few people.

Not worrying about whether it is hacking or isn't hacking, it is shit when people carelessly screw with other peoples' businesses by publicly talking about it like this.

It's like when someone is ranking #1 for a keyword and then another member comes on here and creates a thread saying "How is this site ranking for #1, what's their method" and then posts a screenshot of the site and the url, and then people start explaining how someone is doing it - it's really crap and people should be more considerate.

All up this thread was probably a bad idea - it's outside of what is allowed to be discussed on BHW imo, but even aside from that it's screwed over some people on here too. People should think a bit more.
Okay then, so be it - mods should delete/lock this thread.

I've talked to a bunch of guys outside of bhw and they all knew how to do it. My guess is, that this method is fairly spread around the CPA community. These kind of threads here are the nails in the coffin for it. It's a public forum at the end of the day. The main people who should take the blame are the OPs because they initiate the How questions. We've had a fair share of methods ruined by guys who have leaked them here. Nothing new and out of the ordinary in the daily life of bhw. It gets to a point where idc if I'm contributing to the death of it or not.
 
They're called conversations and you have them on forums.

Dude if this is you being smart them it's no wonder you're as (un)successful after 10 years on an IM forum as you were when you started and still having to pilfer scammy methods like this.

You want to laugh at something, find a mirror or your bank balance.

This thread really was a magnet for all the geniuses on here.


you are pretty narrow sighted and argumentative

good luck with the bumps
 
you are pretty narrow sighted and argumentative

good luck with the bumps
Takes two to tango big boy. You called me out for apparently bumping the thread first. I didn't start talking to you.

Next time mind your own business if you don't want it to come back to you or take it on the chin like a man if you do.
 
Takes two to tango big boy. You called me out for apparently bumping the thread first. I didn't start talking to you. Next time mind your own business if you don't want it to come back to you.

you are literally bumping the thread and spreading it while you argue against it, which is ridiculously silly once you step back

i also think it shouldnt be spread too much (think it should go jr vip) but i dont particularly care one way or another
 
Back
Top