upl8t
Regular Member
- Apr 9, 2008
- 475
- 85
Google isn't manipulating it's own system to rank pages like wikipedia, yahoo, amazon, etc. We all know that backlinks = rankings (as it always has). Sorry to break it to you, but those websites just have more (natural) backlinks than your little MNS. They have PR9 and people always use them as a reference when linking to a relevant site, giving them tons of real backlinks from real places.
You want to change the game? Make every1 else stop linking back to them.
So you're saying that all of their incredibly thin ( simple shitty content ) pages that have almost no if not no backlinks from external sources rank because of their enormous backlinks? That just doesn't make sense to me. What makes sense is that their pages, all of them, are juiced. I do belive that Amazon and many others make it on their own but some like Wiki are boosted.