soa0611
Elite Member
- Apr 20, 2015
- 2,790
- 2,542
Google dick sucking for rankings is a real thing.
where can i suck to improve my rankings?
Google dick sucking for rankings is a real thing.
Can you not just keep things professional? You lower the tone of the whole forum with these unproductive comments.
Let's talk real, tangible things. Share insights that are valuable. Remember our goal here is to grow our businesses. Let's share with that goal in mind.
where can i suck to improve my rankings?
You're just virtue signaling while spreading disinformation. You're here to look good for Google, that's all.
BTW I saw your tens of latest posts with 100% BS and wrong SEO advice from a complete newb. I avoided responding, because I know you got a personal issue with me, and you obviously just want the attention.
None of the stuff you share is valuable.
You're just virtue signaling while spreading disinformation. You're here to look good for Google, that's all.
That's as high a level as I'll go with you.
BTW I saw your tens of latest posts with 100% BS and wrong SEO advice from a complete newb. I avoided responding, because I know you got a personal issue with me, and you obviously just want the attention.
Edited.
Wow, 100% BS and wrong SEO advice.
Can't say much to that!
I guess all the people that I've helped who have gained better rankings just got lucky.
I wish you nothing but success on your SEO work.
That doesn't meant your virtue signaling here is helping others. Calling it like it is is more helpful IMO. I'm not polite but I'm not dishonest.
We got a bad case here where Google is simply leeching everyone's work, more and more, every update, they take more from everyone. Just so pinterest and others can spam the world away and make millions of $ while they impose strict rules that are simply meant to distract. Zero of what they say works. They just want to distract from the real SEO which is what Pinterest does. Pinterest scrapes, produces mass content on a industrial level and gets away with it. I'm citing pinterest but there are literally thousands of sites who get away with it.
I just noticed a blip on a client's site. I searched for stuff and guess what....AMP....they're showing AMP results even though that site gets 90% score on speed test.
It's just absurd.
You seem to mind when I call out the truth about Google. I respect your disagreement but if you're gonna say that what I say isn't helping, then I'm sorry mate. Your white knight attitude is 100% wrong. Sorry for calling it bullshit but that's what it seems like.
Have a good day.
I wish you nothing but success on your SEO work.
That doesn't meant your virtue signaling here is helping others. Calling it like it is is more helpful IMO. I'm not polite but I'm not dishonest.
We got a bad case here where Google is simply leeching everyone's work, more and more, every update, they take more from everyone. Just so pinterest and others can spam the world away and make millions of $ while they impose strict rules that are simply meant to distract. Zero of what they say works. They just want to distract from the real SEO which is what Pinterest does. Pinterest scrapes, produces mass content on a industrial level and gets away with it. I'm citing pinterest but there are literally thousands of sites who get away with it.
I just noticed a blip on a client's site. I searched for stuff and guess what....AMP....they're showing AMP results even though that site gets 90% score on speed test.
It's just absurd.
You seem to mind when I call out the truth about Google. I respect your disagreement but if you're gonna say that what I say isn't helping, then I'm sorry mate. Your white knight attitude is 100% wrong. Sorry for calling it bullshit but that's what it seems like.
Have a good day.
Do you use mass spam or spammy backlinks on your websites?
If you do, how do you get on in big G's results?
What you call white knight I call being a professional and not wallowing in self pity like a baby.
Do you consider a U$ 2000 link from FAMOUSBRAND spammy?
Is it OK if brands exchange links worth thousands among each other?
What do you call spammy links, exactly?
No I don't consider a $2000 link from a famous brand spammy.
That's a good link by the sound of it.
I have no idea what this is related to.....
I was just interested in how you work online.
Maybe I've missed something.
Do you follow Google guidelines or are you more "blackhat" or what?
I wasn't having a pop at you or anything....
To me, spammy links are buying hundreds of blog comments for $5
It was a rhetorical question.
To me there are no spammy links. Every link is a link.
Just because you pay U$ 2000 for a link it doesn't make it good. But Google thinks otherwise. They get to decide which links are OK and who gets to trade links.
To me there are no spammy links. Every link is a link.
Right, ok.
Discussion ends here to be honest.
Right, ok.
Discussion ends here to be honest.
Right, ok.
Discussion ends here to be honest.
Didn't you post before asking people for websites to do an analysis? You said you would get back to people on these sites with your findings.
I shared some websites too, and I don't even want to be salty about it. I did my own analysis on my own data just fine.
Heard jack-shit back from you. Smart way to get data I admit. But I am not going to read you talk about professionalism.
Bart proves his point with good logical steps. Stop acting so high and mighty. I have helped people too, that are ranking well. Doesn't magically make me good at SEO.
You want to act professional? Let me give you one.
Professional simply means "engaged in a specified activity as one's main paid occupation rather than as a pastime.". Most of us here are making our living with SEO. This is how most SEO people communicate. You didn't dictate what that is supposed to be like.
Not here to discuss anything further, just my two cents.
ON topic. This update just feels like a repeat on whatever happened in May. I love anyone to have statistical data to show otherwise. But in Europe it's pretty much the same. My guess, is that corona behavior changed user behavior and the algo is having trouble dealing with that. This update was just a repeat because Google was being pressured on the CORE update being so delayed.