[Google Ads Discussion] False “Cloaking” Suspensions After Verified BOV — Anyone Else Noticing This Pattern?

• I successfully complete Business Operations Verification (BOV)
• Everything runs smooth for several hours or days
• Then, boom — permanent suspension for “Circumventing Systems”
• Appeal = denied with the standard “cloaking” message

Theories I’m considering:​

• Some new AI-level pattern detection tied to branded keywords?
• Post-BOV trust score bug or delayed flagging from the previous review?
• Overlapping DNS/CDN fingerprints between accounts?
• Or maybe they’re training a new anti-fraud model that correlates account patterns rather than actual cloaking behavior?

What I’d like to discuss:​

• Have you guys seen similar “false cloaking” bans lately?
• Any pattern between keyword types, landing page themes, or account age?
• Any workaround or appeal wording that worked for you recently?

billy_vonka said:

Hey guys,


Has anyone else noticed that Google Ads has become insanely sensitive to “Cloaking / Circumventing Systems” lately — even on clean, fully verified accounts?


Here’s what’s happening on my end:

• I successfully complete Business Operations Verification (BOV)
• Everything runs smooth for several hours or days
• Then, boom — permanent suspension for “Circumventing Systems”
• Appeal = denied with the standard “cloaking” message

No cloaking, no redirects, no dynamic swaps — 100% clean setup.
The lander, domain, and ad copy are fully compliant.
And this already happened twice across different accounts.

---

Theories I’m considering:​

• Some new AI-level pattern detection tied to branded keywords?
• Post-BOV trust score bug or delayed flagging from the previous review?
• Overlapping DNS/CDN fingerprints between accounts?
• Or maybe they’re training a new anti-fraud model that correlates account patterns rather than actual cloaking behavior?

---

What I’d like to discuss:​

• Have you guys seen similar “false cloaking” bans lately?
• Any pattern between keyword types, landing page themes, or account age?
• Any workaround or appeal wording that worked for you recently?

---

I’m not running anything blackhat here — this is about legit verified setups getting nuked by the system.
Would be great to hear from anyone managing multiple accounts or agency-level setups — maybe we can find a common trigger.


Let’s share some data points and see what’s going on

---

Goal: to figure out what exactly Google’s latest detection model is flagging as “cloaking” when it’s clearly not.

Click to expand...

snkrsresell said:

If Google's AI triggered the BOV on your account, it means it identified a fairly high probability of global risk associated with your account, prompting it to subject you to this verification. If you are not engaging in cloaking, the AI has therefore banned you preventively, as it cannot take the risk of a potentially fraudulent account impacting the experience of Google users. Consequently, your account has been banned. This specific reason means that you have at least a 70% chance of having your account reactivated after submitting an appeal, since the AI acted on the principle of precaution.

Click to expand...