Shpee123
Newbie
- Feb 10, 2018
- 8
- 0
So here's the situation,
There's several famous individuals on twitter with hundred thousand followers whose accounts I impersonate, using accounts seemingly identical in every way except for a slightly changed twitter handle. When one of these famous individuals tweets, I reply to it with my impersonation account pushing my own wares, but to unsuspecting followers it looks as if the OP is replying to his own tweet. I then have about another 100+ accounts which I use to like, retweet, and comment on my impersonation reply, in efforts to gain engagements and make it the topmost reply to the original tweet, except it never works.
I'm not alone in this game here, there's hundreds of people doing the same thing as me. Impersonating an account, then replying and using other fake accounts to gain engagement. Many times their reply has no where near the number of engagements as mine do, yet somehow they become the top reply.
So correct me if I'm wrong, but this is because their replies are getting the most impressions, or views, and so much so that twitter's algorithm is classifying them above everyone else, even though they have relatively few engagements and comments. I get several hundred impressions per reply while they're getting several thousand. What really baffles me is that these impressions have to be from real people, rather than fakes, right? I mean I can understand buying bulk likes or retweets, but who would bother just buying bulk views? Is that even a thing?
There's also some aspects of twitter's algorithm that I wonder if I'm not using to the full potential, or using incorrectly. Like my fake accounts log on, engage my reply quickly, then log off, however I remember hearing at one point that things like 'time spent reading tweet' is factored into the algorithm, and obviously my accounts spend basically no time doing that. I've also been wondering if my fake engagements/impressions are somehow being disqualified from the algorithm because the accounts are all logging in from the same proxy IP. They're all registered PVA's, and twitter hasn't acted suspiciously or banned any of them yet, but I wonder if it's something their algorithm is picking up anyways.
Hell, maybe I'm just being paranoid about this whole thing, but if anyone has any input whatsoever on how getting top reply works, and the best way to do it, I'd greatly appreciate hearing from you.
There's several famous individuals on twitter with hundred thousand followers whose accounts I impersonate, using accounts seemingly identical in every way except for a slightly changed twitter handle. When one of these famous individuals tweets, I reply to it with my impersonation account pushing my own wares, but to unsuspecting followers it looks as if the OP is replying to his own tweet. I then have about another 100+ accounts which I use to like, retweet, and comment on my impersonation reply, in efforts to gain engagements and make it the topmost reply to the original tweet, except it never works.
I'm not alone in this game here, there's hundreds of people doing the same thing as me. Impersonating an account, then replying and using other fake accounts to gain engagement. Many times their reply has no where near the number of engagements as mine do, yet somehow they become the top reply.
So correct me if I'm wrong, but this is because their replies are getting the most impressions, or views, and so much so that twitter's algorithm is classifying them above everyone else, even though they have relatively few engagements and comments. I get several hundred impressions per reply while they're getting several thousand. What really baffles me is that these impressions have to be from real people, rather than fakes, right? I mean I can understand buying bulk likes or retweets, but who would bother just buying bulk views? Is that even a thing?
There's also some aspects of twitter's algorithm that I wonder if I'm not using to the full potential, or using incorrectly. Like my fake accounts log on, engage my reply quickly, then log off, however I remember hearing at one point that things like 'time spent reading tweet' is factored into the algorithm, and obviously my accounts spend basically no time doing that. I've also been wondering if my fake engagements/impressions are somehow being disqualified from the algorithm because the accounts are all logging in from the same proxy IP. They're all registered PVA's, and twitter hasn't acted suspiciously or banned any of them yet, but I wonder if it's something their algorithm is picking up anyways.
Hell, maybe I'm just being paranoid about this whole thing, but if anyone has any input whatsoever on how getting top reply works, and the best way to do it, I'd greatly appreciate hearing from you.
