boleklolek
Senior Member
- Nov 12, 2013
- 999
- 232
you can paste it into grammarly and it will do it automatically I believe
Get unique content in 1 second and 1 click for free !!
- Thread starter cx3571
- Start date
- Status
jacker818
Power Member
- Jun 10, 2010
- 773
- 268
you can paste it into grammarly and it will do it automatically I believe
I tried that it doesn't work :/
I can't really see the point of using this method. Let's be honest, if we can convert this speech to text then so can the search engines. What will eventually happen is that the search engines will crawl the video sharing sites as they already do, and take the published date of the videos. The earliest date will then be regarded as the original source, whilst the later one (the text version) will be looked at as plagiarized. It's just my opinion but knowing what we all know about Google, things do get harder and if we really want to continue in IM and respect our sites then I would strongly reconsider this method and not use it. It may well work now but believe me, it's only a matter of time until we get caught out!
Use it, but at your own risk!
Use it, but at your own risk!
danbarqami
Junior Member
- Jan 6, 2016
- 173
- 28
Great share! If people don't like it, it is up to them. For the rest of us, we will use it to the fullest before it become obsolete.
Phunky
Power Member
- Aug 23, 2009
- 518
- 286
I'm all for automation, but seeking a tool to add punctuation and commas is pretty fucking lazy man lol
roki4ka
Senior Member
- Jun 20, 2016
- 954
- 743
it's not about laziness it's about impossibility to edit manual 50+ articles daily, alone.. when you have family
what_hat?
Regular Member
- Sep 1, 2012
- 396
- 229
I'm with dazk2002 on this one. I would only use this for tier1s that I don't mind getting hammered by Panda. I mean, if we know something about Google is that it craves for new content. This particular content is already in their servers right now (in form of speech) and if they are not using it yet to answer queries is probably because their speech to text engine is not good enough. But as soon as they feel the quality is good (close to perfect?) I bet they start answering queries based on this "new" content. And then bum! Panda smacked your web2.0s...
Now, after having said that, I will personally abuse this method and contribute to saturate it
Thanks OP!!!
Now, after having said that, I will personally abuse this method and contribute to saturate it
Thanks OP!!!
Phunky
Power Member
- Aug 23, 2009
- 518
- 286
That makes a bit more sense, but there won't be a perfect solution out there. There is no way software is going to take a 4 mile long run on sentence and format it nicely. You will likely have to review the articles anyway in the end.
roki4ka
Senior Member
- Jun 20, 2016
- 954
- 743
true... I have 20+ money sites and all of them have hundred of web2.0 linking to them, for the web2.0 it will be perfect
danbarqami
Junior Member
- Jan 6, 2016
- 173
- 28
One thing I will advise is to check if the video already has the caption text below it. In this case the test is most likely already indexed.
fc-dh
Elite Member
- Oct 20, 2012
- 3,271
- 2,927
Do you have any idea how much computer power it would take to watch every video, translate it to text and then compare to all the english content in the world?
And let's not forget that there are millions upon millions of videos in all kinds of languages, you really think that Google is going to spend millions on recourses to catch a view people doing this??
They don't even go after regulair dup content, just think about it in a logical and economical way the next time you bring a hypothesis to the table, what does Google (and their stockholders) has to gain???
Exactly, absolutely nothing...
You're entitled to your opinion and I'm entitled to mine, and neither of us can prove it either way. As I said, it's just my opinion and I choose not to use such software.
Nikolavrum
Regular Member
- Aug 28, 2013
- 243
- 42
Nice.
- Status