Gates plan to block the sun - what could go wrong?

Advertise on BHW
AdmiralKunka said:
The only solution to reduce the global warming is reducing the CO2 but they don't want this they want to increase it and just try to block partial sunlight. What a smart solution!
Click to expand...
Nuclear Power is an option.

Dark Sky said:
We are already seeing drastic changes in nature from it, more flooding, more forest fires, more storms
Click to expand...

I have seen articles saying the flooding and storms were caused by geoengineering.
Also, how would you know that blocking the sun won't have similar effects or worst in 200 years from now? that still our children's children that will die from it, it's a selfless deed to stop it for them. Especially since it could be caused by us. :P
 
Crazycam727 said:
I usually think Gates has some real fucked up intentions with some of the stuff he’s allegedly doing.

However blocking out the sun would have good intentions, because if it doesn’t - we’d all be fucked , including him.
Click to expand...

you'd be surprised to find out how many rich people have underground bunkers (some of them entire cities) at their disposal, capable of withstanding any major catastrophe affecting the planet's surface (including nuclear war, biological genocide, sunburn, etc)
 
AntiHacker said:
Are we really? Is there any data from 100 or more years ago so we can compare the numbers? Did somebody really tracked all the floods in the past so he can say we experience more floods now? Is there any hard scientific proof from a couple of sources that prove your statement?
Click to expand...

I mean, yes we do track quite a lot. I think glacier tracking is the most famous and you might be familiar with it? There is hard scientific proof that the globe is warming, it's a fact, and there is hard scientific proof that the warmer it gets, the more fires, storms and floods there are.

What your doing is saying "Well, there's no proof if someone jumps into the sun they will die because no one has ever done it before, so therefor it's not hard evidence"

We don't have to manually track floods to know that a warmer planet increases the strength and volume of rain. Likewise with forest fires and storms.

Edit: The only reason we do track, is to get as accurate data as possible to make better predictions on the timeframes.
 
Dark Sky said:
I think glacier tracking is the most famous and you might be familiar with it?
Click to expand...
That feels like a descending question.
Dark Sky said:
What your doing is saying "Well, there's no proof if someone jumps into the sun they will die because no one has ever done it before, so therefor it's not hard evidence"
Click to expand...
This is absolutely not correct.

I'm asking, once again, can you provide me with links from multiple sources that have hard scientific evidence that shows we now have more floods then 100 or more years ago?

I don't know enough about topic to discuss it, but I am willing to learn. So if you have links that can prove that we now have more floods then before, I am willing to read them all and expand my knowledge.
 
AntiHacker said:
That feels like a descending question.

This is absolutely not correct.

I'm asking, once again, can you provide me with links from multiple sources that have hard scientific evidence that shows we now have more floods then 100 or more years ago?

I don't know enough about topic to discuss it, but I am willing to learn. So if you have links that can prove that we now have more floods then before, I am willing to read them all and expand my knowledge.
Click to expand...

But that's the point I was making... I'm not attempting to be condescending, I do come across like that sometimes I agree... but tracking is not the only proof. Going back to my analogy, we don't need proof that jumping into the sun will kill someone, because we know humans can't withstand those temperatures and will die.

Same for flooding, we don't need to track it for proof, we know how the rainfall process works, and we know a warmer planet intensifies and increases frequency of that process.

I'm trying to get you a link that's not biased.

So I think the metoffice would be good to call upon here, a top class weather station with one of the best weather predictions due to their supercomputers power.

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/climate-change/effects-of-climate-change
 
We need to think deeply instead of dismissing it as conspiracy theories.
There's definitely a lot of weirdness about what Gates's doing these days.
 
Crazycam727 said:
I usually think Gates has some real fucked up intentions with some of the stuff he’s allegedly doing.

However blocking out the sun would have good intentions, because if it doesn’t - we’d all be fucked , including him.
Click to expand...
You can't really conclude like this bruh.
Something underground. Earth might be fucked minus him.
 
This idea is much better achievable than the old idea in which scientist planned to block the sun ray by properly positioning multiple huge glass between the sun and earth which costs trillion of dollars.
So, we got nothing to lose just do it!
 
Blackhatworld in the Parallel universe(BIPU) -soon we should start such thread to put all these threads under one section
 
A broad spectrum of hazards could be attributed to temperature rise
I believe this will go onto perpetuate a decade from now
What a wonderful time to be alive!
 
We experienced a bit of a climate change here last year, usually rain falls from March-april to july-august, so farmers know when to plant and when not to, everything suddenly changed last year, rain fell for like a month and the stopped, after few months it started falling again and stopped, long story short, everything just changed, leaving many crops not growing well, but alot of people here believe in spiritual sh*ts, but I know it's climate change.

The arborists won't just stop cutting trees and people won't stop burning bushes, atleat if you're going to cut a tree, why not plant it back.
 
Ice age 2 coming soon.
 
Exxon and Shell knew about climate change for at least 40 years ago. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

The fossil fuel producers funded fantastically researched and indepth studies on the effects fossil fuels will have on the climate.

These reports where made from the 70's all the way through to today. 100% of these reports made it clear that climate change will happen if fossil fuels are burned.

The reports where kept private and only leaked recently. https://www.theguardian.com/environ...d-exxons-secret-1980s-climate-change-warnings

Rather than tackle the underlying issues, ExxonMobil, Shell etc spent billions sowing climate doubt. They put profits above the fate of the planet.

With regards to Bill Gates plan. There is some science to back it up. Volcanoes spewing particles into the air can effectively reduce the global temperature. In some massive volcanic eruptions, this effect can last for years. https://earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/sensing-our-planet/volcanoes-and-climate-change
 
Block out the Sun? That is the most retarded thing i’ve ever heard. It’s the heat that’s the problem if anything, not the light. I bet is just a cover story for some kind of privatised space race everyone is at right now. Only difference between Gates and tech giants, is Gates always tries to come across as a do-gooder.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top