No one should use this. It is totally giving wrong results. I tried some text which are on web for years and they all marked as "Good and unique". OP, first of all thanks for your efforts but why are you promoting such a malfunctioning stuff to people? It may cause them to lose money and time. No offense but I must say anyone who is serious about he uniqueness of his/her articles should avoid using this tool. All it does is to go through whole article by grouping some number of successive words with quotation marks and searching their existence. Let me give you an example
"
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science.". That is a quote from Albert Einstein. If someone wrote that statement in this way: "
The most beautiful thing we may experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science.", OP's script accepts this as unique.
You will understand what I am saying when you click on the test results (strings).
Bottom line, OP thanks again but IMHO, you should remove this tool asap. It is totally misleading. You need to work on it and then re-release again. Anyone who likes to have a plagiarism checker,
IF YOU HAVE MONEY, go buy copyscape
IF YOU DON'T HAVE MONEY, go get grammarly premium for free while it lasts
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...21-method-how-get-grammarly-premium-free.html