Fix SEO or Start Again?

This is easier said that done.. I've got Ahrefs and SEMRush, done backlink checks; no toxic backlinks. I don't have many, but I have enough to warrant ranking for some long tails, or exact title searches.

View attachment 140867
Did you mistakenly reveal your site?
Edit: I guess not. :p

By the way, that site doesn't look that good; plus it is not even https. Work on the on site issues first may be. And build good links obviously.
 
I mean starting again never hurts, but if you can learn from it and fix it that would be even better.

I would at a minimum 301.
 
Can you elaborate on this?

Somewhat joking, but not really.

Since starting I've change permalinks multiple times, and now have a lot of redirects. I believe this is the root of where things started going wrong. Changing my permalink structures .etc
 
Did you mistakenly reveal your site?
Edit: I guess not. :p
By the way, that site doesn't look that good; plus it is not even https. Work on the on site issues first may be. And build good links obviously.
No, you can go there and critique. The HTTPS is broken because of a migration to a new host today.
What is wrong with, for example, this article: https://truemiller.com/flip-bitcoin-localbitcoins/
 
I mean starting again never hurts, but if you can learn from it and fix it that would be even better.

I would at a minimum 301.

I would definitely prefer to come out the other side of this with a recovery under my belt. But honestly, I've been trying to fix this for a few months now.
 
So from the few people I've bumped into on here, they've been suggesting that I should not rewrite content because it should be left to age?
Updates are okay, but full rewrites are not.
I'm not sure how truthful this is, but seems there are varying opinions.

Well, as long as you don't change the published date everything should be alright.

What you heard is wrong btw. Google loves fresh and new content especially when is updated.

You should keep going
 
Well, as long as you don't change the published date everything should be alright.

What you heard is wrong btw. Google loves fresh and new content especially when is updated.

You should keep going

Fresh new, but I don't know how that works with content rewrites, for example, for content that's already ranking.
Conflicting opinions from the many wizards of SEO.
 
Somewhat joking, but not really.

Since starting I've change permalinks multiple times, and now have a lot of redirects. I believe this is the root of where things started going wrong. Changing my permalink structures .etc
example.com/blog/01/2018/this-is-title-example-of-article > example.com/blog/category/this-is-title-example-of-article/ > example.com/this-is-title-example-of-article-2019 > example.com/blog/this-is-title-example-of-article-2020

You mean you did something like this?
 
It looks like you were overdoing your SEO. If you messed with permalinks it might take a long time to recover.

Also I found ~23 external liks on your article "How to make money with bitcoin". I checked only a few though and they were do follow. External linking is good, but you should focus on less sources or make others as no follow. For example, when you list "best bitcoin mining software", make these links no follow as you don't really use them as a source, and when linking to wikipedia use do follow.

In general, a lot of things could be improved here. Maybe I'll write more my insights later.
 
example.com/blog/01/2018/this-is-title-example-of-article > example.com/blog/category/this-is-title-example-of-article/ > example.com/this-is-title-example-of-article-2019 > example.com/blog/this-is-title-example-of-article-2020

You mean you did something like this?
Yes, not so much recently, but during the 5 years I've been up, I've done that. But now the vast majority of 404s .etc have been redirected (with a list of over 1k redirects).
 
It looks like you were overdoing your SEO. If you messed with permalinks it might take a long time to recover.

Also I found ~23 external liks on your article "How to make money with bitcoin". I checked only a few though and they were do follow. External linking is good, but you should focus on less sources or make others as no follow. For example, when you list "best bitcoin mining software", make these links no follow as you don't really use them as a source, and when linking to wikipedia use do follow.

In general, a lot of things could be improved here. Maybe I'll write more my insights later.

Yeah I've been trying to optimise stuff more and more, in the hopes it will recover, but always baring in mind that I shouldn't be slamming too many keywords in .etc. I mean the content, realistically speaking, is far better than many of my competitors for certain articles. But it's been an extremely painful journey with no reward for a long time now.

If you could offer your insights it would be greatly, greatly appreciated.
 
You don`t build a brand, you build a casual blog, it's a big difference.
Magazine style, talk about everything, ranking for nothing.
You barely have 20 decent referring domains, I've seen cheap PBNs better than your site link profile.

SEO costs money, proper SEO loads, periodically.
Branding costs more money.

Your site is not different then any 99% of your "niche" if we can talk about your site is in a specific niche other then "make money online".

Sorry, you understand the SEO and branding wrong. This is the reality.

28aa5b7281f113f33449f8f091a0236e.gif
 
Yes, not so much recently, but during the 5 years I've been up, I've done that. But now the vast majority of 404s .etc have been redirected (with a list of over 1k redirects).
You would be better off if you spent one year learning SEO and do it for 4 years, then trying to do SEO for 5 years.
 
You don`t build a brand, you build a casual blog, it's a big difference.
Magazine style, talk about everything, ranking for nothing.
You barely have 20 decent referring domains, I've seen cheap PBNs better than your site link profile.

SEO costs money, proper SEO loads, periodically.
Branding costs more money.

Your site is not different then any 99% of your "niche" if we can talk about your site is in a specific niche other then "make money online".

Sorry, you understand the SEO and branding wrong. This is the reality.

28aa5b7281f113f33449f8f091a0236e.gif
Much appreciated, this is the hard truth I need!

However, I would take this as full truth if I hadn't experienced ranks before.
I have in the past, ranked higher than the companies I've written about; without the use of PBNs .etc.
I have always been whitehat..
 
You would be better off if you spent one year learning SEO and do it for 4 years, then trying to do SEO for 5 years.

I've definitely learned a thing or two through trial and error on the way. I'm just hesitant about delving into shadier areas..
 
I'm glad you don't take it wrong.

Update the content, start going a bit "black hat" as web 2.0`s and other free ways to build links.

The thing I'm most fearful about is losing my ranks later down the line, after I build. That's why I'm hesitant to consider this sort of thing.
 
I've definitely learned a thing or two through trial and error on the way. I'm just hesitant about delving into shadier areas..
The thing or two is not enough for 5 years. You should banking a couple of thousands of passive income by now at least.
Also, there are many SEO methods that are not shady, such as on-page optimization, which you need to learn first. That is fundamental.
 
Back
Top