FB suing Adscend for clickjacking

haha im saying 6 figures as in $999,999. But I mean they prob. are in the Mil. in revenue, I just don't think it's that high simply because I know how the gov and media portray people who are being accused of something. They exaggerate everything to make it sound like they are the bad guys.
 
Statement by Adscend Media, LLC Regarding the Complaints Filed Yesterday (Thurs., Jan. 26) by the Washington Attorney General's Office and Facebook


NEW YORK, NEW YORK, JANUARY 27, 2012 --
Adscend Media, LLC today vehemently denied the allegations in complaints filed yesterday by the Washington Attorney General's office and Facebook and characterized them as "absolutely and unequivocally false."
"At no time did we engage in the activity alleged in the complaints. Adscend Media will provide a vigorous defense against these false claims," the company said in a strongly worded statement released today.
"Adscend Media strictly complies with its legal obligations under federal and state law. We are undertaking an investigation to determine whether any of Adscend Media's affiliates engaged in the activity alleged by the Attorney General's office and Facebook. If they did, we are fully certain that the activity was conducted without the company's knowledge." the statement continued.
"If our investigation determines that any affiliate(s) engaged in this improper activity, Adscend will administer its long-standing company policy and immediately terminate the affiliate(s) responsible for these actions - as we have in the past when our internal mechanism has made such discoveries. Adscend Media does not tolerate affiliates that violate the law or Adscend's policies," the company further stated.
The company assured that the pending actions will not affect the high quality or continuity of service to Adscend Media clients.
Mark J. Rosenberg, the company's attorney, said, "We find it deeply troubling that the Attorney General's office made a public spectacle of these serious allegations without first questioning the company as part of its investigatory process and, even more inexplicably, without notifying the company that the complaint was being filed. Adscend Media first learned of the allegations from media inquiries."
Rosenberg, of the New York City based firm of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin, continued, "We are disturbed that the Attorney General's office would allow public resources to be used in an irresponsible manner, particularly when these allegations are absolutely untrue and could do tremendous harm to Adscend Media's reputation and business. Adscend Media is concerned about the source of these false allegations, and therefore is fully prepared to pursue a defamation action against the persons and entities responsible for tarnishing the reputation of the company."
 
Last edited:
thanks for informing about this...

if they make 20 million dollars thru clickjacking, its HUGE
 
This wont last, this case isnt that grounded - its more like a note of warning to everyone using clickjacking cos this does exist. As long as adscendmedia can prove it never knew this was happeining the U.S govt has no case.
 
As i know Adscend was not allowing fb traffic anymore (more than 1 year ago)

Is ironic how they sue adscendmedia and do nothing to the network that "sponsor" 99% of scams and spams on fb (cpa lead )
 
you know I don't think FB/ AG would have filed if they didn't feel they had a very winnable case

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57...ook-likejacker-settles-with-washington-state/

I know this is an old thread but your statement is laughable to say the very least. Apparently the case wasn't strong enough (same with FB v. MaxBounty). Adscend walked away and only paid $100,000 in attorney fees? Seems like FB got the shaft on this one considering Adscend is rumored to make $1.2 million per month and also was rumored to have made $20M off of this particular "scheme." I'm sure this frivolous lawsuit made for nice headlines pre-IPO though. :p
 
Back
Top