- Nov 20, 2008
- 1,853
- 601
Hi Money Man,
$99 per month is still too high for most people, I think. However, if too many members subscribe at $49.95, we will consider about it.
Sincerely,
Lively Browser (Lively Marketing Tools Programmer)
Facebook friend bot reccomendation
- Thread starter scotty1000
- Start date
Hi Money Man,
$99 per month is still too high for most people, I think. However, if too many members subscribe at $49.95, we will consider about it.
Sincerely,
Lively Browser (Lively Marketing Tools Programmer)
Money Man
Elite Member
- Apr 2, 2009
- 1,693
- 788
Hi Money Man,
$99 per month is still too high for most people, I think. However, if too many members subscribe at $49.95, we will consider about it.
Sincerely,
Lively Browser (Lively Marketing Tools Programmer)
Please check your polling thread for my reasons behind suggesting this.
$49.95/mo is a good introductory price for the new monthly option, clearly lively is really confident about his product and hes thinking long term here. Once all the ex FW users flock to FFAP im pretty sure he'll raise the monthly fee
You are absolutely right, and you make some very good points.
neeka387
Registered Member
- Feb 7, 2010
- 72
- 20
Hi Money Man,
$99 per month is still too high for most people, I think. However, if too many members subscribe at $49.95, we will consider about it.
Sincerely,
Lively Browser (Lively Marketing Tools Programmer)
I really like the fact that that there is the $49.95/month option since $365 is waaay to steep for my pocket. I would have bout it before at the $99 rate but i was trying to help my mother out with her wedding. As soon as i see some of those funds back i will opt in for $49.95/month.
OnlineGodfather
Senior Member
- Mar 3, 2010
- 1,122
- 413
FFAP is awesome and well worth of the money. Everyone who is in facebook business needs something like this.
Money Man
Elite Member
- Apr 2, 2009
- 1,693
- 788
FFAP is really your only option right now, unless you have your own coder or unless you are a coder yourself. Mind you, it is a very good option. IMHO, it is better than FW ever was. FW was just so user-friendly, so that is why most people preferred it over FFAP. However, when it comes down to feature functionality, FFAP does and always has taken the cake.
I am not trying to bash FW, because it always served its purpose very well. However, I still think FFAP has always been the better option. Just my opinion.
I am not trying to bash FW, because it always served its purpose very well. However, I still think FFAP has always been the better option. Just my opinion.