cparainmaker
BANNED
- Jan 17, 2008
- 377
- 73
The whole concept of seo in the first place is black hat, your trying to manipulate the way you rank in google...some people just go more bh than others!
@litenup: Yes, those are common things people tend to say but they all lack a true definition which of course is great for those SEO firms that can hide behind the word "White Hat" (if there wasn't any made up definition like White Hat SEO they would have a problem).
@dirtbag: In your mind, great. However then it's as you say - a loose definition and then it isn't a real definition.
SEO - Search Engine Optimization is still based on different types of tricks to FOOL search engines and make your site more relevant to a keyword then it really is. This is the core of any type of SEO practice, white hat, grey hat, pink hat or whatever-hat you choose.
White Hat should be;
1. Having a compliant and well coded website (which will make it play well with SE's anyway since they actually like well coded websites that has standards in mind).
2. Nothing more.
Thus all White Hat tricks should be considered Black Hat and thus leaving the market for White Hat quite non-existent and therefor i argue that White Hat is really just a stupid expression and that "SEO" in its every form should be considered Black Hat and that this "Blackhat" and "Whitehat" should go bury itself and that new, clear definitions should arise from its ashes.
Not that it would save the world or anything, it just bothers me that these definitions are so extremely loose and abused by especially SEO firms.
Hey general, I agree with bpaw.
Whitehat is when you listen to Google, and Blackhat is when you enter through the backdoor
Not true. Google do care about their TOS and do enforce it:
Google's TOS say you cant access their site via automated means, if you are detected they will block your IP (at least for a while)
Site banning is not really to do with TOS but webmaster guidelines:
A site can be banned by Google for simply having too many keywords or messpellings on a page - been there done that
A site can be banned after a manual review just because they think it doesn't contain enough content but has affiliate links (thin affiliate sites) - been there done that too.