Does web 2.0's work?

They most definitely works. Here is the result of a recent project.

Improvement 115 > 32

This is the rank improvement for a medium tough keyword after building around 90 web 2.0 properties with 2 - 3 articles.

No second tier has been build yet, so this is from the web 2.0 properties alone.

A new jump is to be expected after building a second and third tier to these web 2.0 properties. That might bring the keyword to top 10.

If you want more info PM me or see this thread with questions and answers about this project.



Ovy8Z9G
 
Yes! Tried and tested.

We have 4-6 web 2.0 with unique content. and 50% of our keywords is improving.
 
I read somewhere where Google doesnt look much at web 2.0s is this right? Do they work?

I'm looking for a good web 2.0 service as well, any suggestions would be appreciated.


How about you use the search? Because this question has been asked for about ohw.... a 100.000 times?
 
Yes, Every thing works to get ranking better but you have to do it properly.
 
Web 2.0 works very efficiently and reliably for good ranking.
It is dependent on you how you use it.
 
It does. Check this http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/823330-does-web-2-0s-work.html.
 
hye ningning, how you spread up the backlink?

how many backlink per day?
 
Quality web 2.0 works wonders, when used in the right mix in your overall linkbuilding strategy.
 
Quality web 2.0 works wonders, when used in the right mix in your overall linkbuilding strategy.

What you define as quality web 2.0s? How many articles, videos, images, links, use spun content or all orginal? Would you use them again for another site?
 
What you define as quality web 2.0s? How many articles, videos, images, links, use spun content or all orginal? Would you use them again for another site?

I would define a quality web 2.0 as one built to look real, multiple posts, some videos/images, maybe a link or 2 to non competition authority websites, multiple pages(about me, contact, privacy, etc...), maybe a social profile or 4, logo or personal picture.
 
I would define a quality web 2.0 as one built to look real, multiple posts, some videos/images, maybe a link or 2 to non competition authority websites, multiple pages(about me, contact, privacy, etc...), maybe a social profile or 4, logo or personal picture.

Most of mine have at least 10 posts/articles, trickles of traffic on the wordpress sites that I can see, about pages, you tube videos imbedded (not mine), plenty of images and some of the them I used photoshop for page titles for the images in the articles. Every article has links to wikipedia, webmd, non commercial authority sites, a few have a Facebook page, but no twitter or pinterest or instagram, no contact pages, no logos, but I have personal pictures on some of them.

Is this enough?
 
I really want someone to do a web 2.0 case study showing shit quality web 2.0s vs High quality web 2.0s

They wont because shit quality web 2.0s work, I don't know where people got this info from but its 100% false.

Im speaking from experience.
 
High quality is only to:

1. Impress Clients
2. Pass a Manual Review
3. Pass Web 2.0 Moderation

In terms of ranking, I have not seen a difference either way. I go for not spun garbage quality because I have had my share of Web 2.0 deleted because I used spun garbage content.
 
High quality is only to:

1. Impress Clients
2. Pass a Manual Review
3. Pass Web 2.0 Moderation

In terms of ranking, I have not seen a difference either way. I go for not spun garbage quality because I have had my share of Web 2.0 deleted because I used spun garbage content.

I want to pass a manual review and pass web 2.0 moderation, got no clients to impress, although I do like to impress myself lol
 
1. How many links should I make per page?
2. How many pages should I make per blog?
 
Back
Top