Do you trust GEmini to write you SEO articles ?

javadth · Tuesday at 6:41 PM

Do you trust GEmini to write you SEO articles ?
i barely use gemini to write me SEO articles to publish on big sites because I think google can smell his AI tools
mostly using GPT or clude but sometimes I think to myself that Gemini knows Google secrets, and if you use good prompts, it could write high-quality contents
what about you ?

MJTechPark · Tuesday at 6:44 PM

Gemini is an ai tool and Any AI tool is as good as the user who is using that. If you give great prompt, Have a understanding of SEO articles then gemini can also create some great piece of content.

Beklink · Tuesday at 6:46 PM

For me, Gemini sucks hard for generating content, however, i am using it to write outlines for the articles and i give this outline to Claude to generate the content. I find it pretty good in generating the outline of the article but never for content generating.

pervez512 · Tuesday at 6:52 PM

i prefer claude for SEO articles

tomguis · Tuesday at 7:03 PM

Claude will be the best choice with some human touches. Btw you won't get much results without editing it manually

Venusaur · Tuesday at 7:07 PM

Gemini was the best a few months ago, but after some updates, some competitors are better and Gemini is lagging behind

Cloud Elite · Tuesday at 7:13 PM

I most recommend ChatGPT for writing SEO articles. They are writing good quality, and informative content.

alex_zen · Wednesday at 8:47 AM

I don’t think Google can simply detect and penalize an article because it was written with Gemini. The bigger issue is whether the content is actually useful and original.
I’d use Gemini or GPT for research and first drafts, then fact-check, rewrite and add real experience before publishing. That usually makes a much bigger difference than which AI model you used

flackz · Thursday at 9:48 AM

javadth said:
Do you trust GEmini to write you SEO articles ?

Since Google Gemini and Anthropic Claude use a special algorithm which literally marks all the texts with "Hey, this text is AI-generated", they should never be used to generate any content which you expect to get ranked by search engines.

This is not a rumor but an official fact.

javadth · Thursday at 9:49 AM

flackz said:
Since Google Gemini and Anthropic Claude use a special algorithm which literally marks all the texts with "Hey, this text is AI-generated", they should never be used to generate any content which you expect to get ranked by search engines.

This is not a rumor but an official fact.

it seems all of the ais but grok using this ai marks

Czaq · Thursday at 3:07 PM

Claude also generates better content for me. Especially with the right prompt.

When I create AI content for most important my sites, I always edit and proofread the content before publishing. Currently, Google doesn't penalize AI itself; it penalizes misleading content and failure to comply with EEAT.

Proxy_Soxy · Thursday at 4:18 PM

Gemini does use SynthID for text, but I don’t see anything from Google saying that means a ranking penalty. Their Search docs still focus on low-value scaled content, not AI use itself.

And I can’t find anything from Anthropic saying Claude text is watermarked either.

tariga · Thursday at 4:20 PM

Not without me going over everything line for line and partially rewriting stuff. A lot of AI content still reads too “AI-ish” and publicizing AI slop is counter effective.

flackz · Friday at 12:13 PM

Proxy_Soxy said:
And I can’t find anything from Anthropic saying Claude text is watermarked either.

https://support.claude.com/en/articles/16266773-how-claude-marks-ai-generated-content

Monsterer · Friday at 1:55 PM

Google can smell every AI tool if the article is made. So its up to you how you will use and execute it

Zyro Agency · Friday at 2:01 PM

If it were me, I would use AI for research and drafting, then refine the content using practical experience, data, and my own unique perspective. That is the safer approach to long-term SEO.

Proxy_Soxy · Friday at 2:22 PM

flackz said:
https://support.claude.com/en/articles/16266773-how-claude-marks-ai-generated-content

Oh I see, my bad

CyHead · 2026-08-16T10:01:10+0100

Claude is better, but I can easily tell any AI generated content from human written.

It ultimately comes down to the editing process.

Most people are terrible writers. They have a high school level of writing and when you see tons of articles written with perfectly polished grammar and over punctuation, it's an obvious tell - besides all the AI writing tropes.

Then you have the subheadings and bullet headings. Thin content that repeats itself over and over again.

BHSEONewb · 2026-08-16T18:50:57+0100

I use AI at most for generating outlines and doing some of the grunt work that I used to do. If I wanted to write on a topic for SEO placement, I'd manually read the top 5 or so articles, get the best points from them, their outlines, and then expand upon them with my experience. Now I have AI do the background research and outline something with a summary of what the other sites talked about. Then I write it myself. I'll also use it to generate images because I'm sick of nasty letters.

jeezabull · 2026-08-16T18:53:53+0100

flackz said:
Since Google Gemini and Anthropic Claude use a special algorithm which literally marks all the texts with "Hey, this text is AI-generated", they should never be used to generate any content which you expect to get ranked by search engines.

This is not a rumor but an official fact.

What about local AI's? I am going to set up deepseek locally and Would like to know if it will help or not

Do you trust GEmini to write you SEO articles ?

Elite Member

Registered Member

Elite Member

Newbie

Junior Member

Elite Member

Newbie

Newbie

Senior Member

Elite Member

Junior Member

Newbie

Newbie

Senior Member

Elite Member

Newbie

Newbie

Supreme Member

Regular Member

Registered Member

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World