Do you trust GEmini to write you SEO articles ?

[javadth]

Do you trust GEmini to write you SEO articles ?
i barely use gemini to write me SEO articles to publish on big sites because I think google can smell his AI tools
mostly using GPT or clude but sometimes I think to myself that Gemini knows Google secrets, and if you use good prompts, it could write high-quality contents
what about you ?

 

[MJTechPark]

Gemini is an ai tool and Any AI tool is as good as the user who is using that. If you give great prompt, Have a understanding of SEO articles then gemini can also create some great piece of content.

 

[Beklink]

For me, Gemini sucks hard for generating content, however, i am using it to write outlines for the articles and i give this outline to Claude to generate the content. I find it pretty good in generating the outline of the article but never for content generating.

 

[pervez512]

i prefer claude for SEO articles

 

[tomguis]

Claude will be the best choice with some human touches. Btw you won't get much results without editing it manually

 

[Venusaur]

Gemini was the best a few months ago, but after some updates, some competitors are better and Gemini is lagging behind

 

[Cloud Elite]

I most recommend ChatGPT for writing SEO articles. They are writing good quality, and informative content.

 

[alex_zen]

I don’t think Google can simply detect and penalize an article because it was written with Gemini. The bigger issue is whether the content is actually useful and original.
I’d use Gemini or GPT for research and first drafts, then fact-check, rewrite and add real experience before publishing. That usually makes a much bigger difference than which AI model you used

 

[flackz]

Do you trust GEmini to write you SEO articles ?

Since Google Gemini and Anthropic Claude use a special algorithm which literally marks all the texts with "Hey, this text is AI-generated", they should never be used to generate any content which you expect to get ranked by search engines.

This is not a rumor but an official fact.

 

[javadth]

Since Google Gemini and Anthropic Claude use a special algorithm which literally marks all the texts with "Hey, this text is AI-generated", they should never be used to generate any content which you expect to get ranked by search engines.

This is not a rumor but an official fact.

it seems all of the ais but grok using this ai marks

 

[Czaq]

Claude also generates better content for me. Especially with the right prompt.

When I create AI content for most important my sites, I always edit and proofread the content before publishing. Currently, Google doesn't penalize AI itself; it penalizes misleading content and failure to comply with EEAT.

 

[Proxy_Soxy]

Gemini does use SynthID for text, but I don’t see anything from Google saying that means a ranking penalty. Their Search docs still focus on low-value scaled content, not AI use itself.

And I can’t find anything from Anthropic saying Claude text is watermarked either.

 

[tariga]

Not without me going over everything line for line and partially rewriting stuff. A lot of AI content still reads too “AI-ish” and publicizing AI slop is counter effective.