Hassan Amin
Banned-Rules Violation
- Nov 3, 2021
- 34
- 5
How many links is appropriate from web 2.0
Do web 2.0 links still work?
- Thread starter Hassan Amin
- Start date
-
- Tags
- wep2.0
- Apr 4, 2014
- 6,454
- 4,859
I treat web2.0 as my own (free) PBN.
About linking out @tiiberius is the best person to answer this question.
I don't have a specific number as I make it random. With expired tumblers, you have a sitewide link but it's entirely up to you if you want to link out from posts.
Seobymicheal
Previously banned member
- Sep 26, 2022
- 133
- 44
The Answer Is Yes. They have always worked and will continue to work.
Jelly Baen
Senior Member
- Mar 1, 2017
- 1,127
- 105
they are effective when you post unique content.
- Jan 5, 2022
- 243
- 39
Yes, they still work but you need to have a proper backlinking structure.
Gebb
Senior Member
- Jul 12, 2021
- 849
- 646
They still work, I use those for low-medium competition and definitely move rankings, but I always try to make a """natural"""" web 2.0 with contact page, about and a copy pasted disclaimer/privacy policy page, and I use AI content and try to link out to authoritative websites as well (it take seconds, just link a specific term or main topics to Wikipedia or the first sites that show up in Google or search the term with some huge website like Forbes or similar. it's just to give an "article with sources" feelings, don't know if this is useful or not but it just takes a few moments to do that).
I generally still follow the stuff mentioned in this guide,
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/guide-the-art-of-super-web-2-0-creation.683979/
despite being quite old I think that is a great way to make those web 2.0 properties today.
I generally still follow the stuff mentioned in this guide,
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/guide-the-art-of-super-web-2-0-creation.683979/
despite being quite old I think that is a great way to make those web 2.0 properties today.
HustleTong
Elite Member
- May 30, 2019
- 13,466
- 10,661
A little bit of diversity
Nothing exceptional
Nothing exceptional
- Sep 8, 2015
- 5,597
- 5,419
It's similar to PBNs. More links equals less juice, generally speaking.
1-3 is a good number.
flexpaydude
Elite Member
- May 30, 2009
- 2,403
- 766
Yes, they work but you don't have to rely only on them. You can use them as a part of your link building strategy.
- Aug 4, 2015
- 5,965
- 794
Yes, Indexed Web 2.0 backlinks are good for SEO since they diversify a website's backlink profile.
Excellent quality web 2.0 backlinks are also the most economical web links to make use of on reduced to medium competition keywords to enhance their positions in the online search engine
amitjat
Registered Member
- Jul 28, 2018
- 81
- 25
If it good for tier 2 link building
shizzledizzleeee
Regular Member
- Jan 3, 2013
- 407
- 83
I'm about to start posting to Web 2.0 sites with unique human-readable content. Is there a problem if all my articles have a link to an external website (my domain)? Any tips on how to have them for the longest possible time?
- Sep 22, 2008
- 868
- 499
It depend on how you use it.
Normally we use them in foundation links or use them as a filter between moneysite and cheap links.
Normally we use them in foundation links or use them as a filter between moneysite and cheap links.
Nahidhassan2981
Junior Member
- Dec 1, 2020
- 168
- 25
This is not 100% true, there are a few reasons why people tend to think this way: There are much better strategies to build powerful links that make an impact on our Google ranking
- Jun 24, 2013
- 2,391
- 3,646
Such as....
DuckingOutstanding
Senior Member
- Dec 22, 2015
- 1,108
- 769
Yes if and when, and I can't stress this enough, done properly..
They don't have the same power they used to, but then again no one single type of backlink does anymore and it goes through any type of link. .
By done properly, I mean:
most of them (BUT NOT ALL OF THEM) powered up by varying numbers of tiers of backlinks (T2-T6, come with just T2, some with T3, T4 etc) and not done exactly the same way on each one (if you use the same sage on the same tier levels for every single web 2.0 or any identifiable backlink pattern it will be obvious and likely get devalued quietly)
Also, make sure the content of the Web 2.0 is quality accurate and satisfies the search query it would likely rank for. Also, more important than ever before, make sure they are filled out completely with some sort of NAP information etc.
The more content you can get on your Web 2.0 properties be more excuse they will end up getting as well, back in the day it used to be you could throw up a one page with 2.0 with 300 words of okay text and minimal if any contact information or any other pages that are typically recommended and call it good, nowadays that won't even get indexed like that, you're much better serve to have minimum of five articles per each fully configured Web 2.0 property roughly 1,000 to 1500 words per article, and that's a minimum of five.
Nowadays is more about quality than quantity, so yes they still work, but blasting a bunch of gibberish articles on one pager GSA or Scrapebox web 2.0 and pointing it at your money site just isn't going to cut it anymore
They don't have the same power they used to, but then again no one single type of backlink does anymore and it goes through any type of link. .
By done properly, I mean:
most of them (BUT NOT ALL OF THEM) powered up by varying numbers of tiers of backlinks (T2-T6, come with just T2, some with T3, T4 etc) and not done exactly the same way on each one (if you use the same sage on the same tier levels for every single web 2.0 or any identifiable backlink pattern it will be obvious and likely get devalued quietly)
Also, make sure the content of the Web 2.0 is quality accurate and satisfies the search query it would likely rank for. Also, more important than ever before, make sure they are filled out completely with some sort of NAP information etc.
The more content you can get on your Web 2.0 properties be more excuse they will end up getting as well, back in the day it used to be you could throw up a one page with 2.0 with 300 words of okay text and minimal if any contact information or any other pages that are typically recommended and call it good, nowadays that won't even get indexed like that, you're much better serve to have minimum of five articles per each fully configured Web 2.0 property roughly 1,000 to 1500 words per article, and that's a minimum of five.
Nowadays is more about quality than quantity, so yes they still work, but blasting a bunch of gibberish articles on one pager GSA or Scrapebox web 2.0 and pointing it at your money site just isn't going to cut it anymore
team475
Regular Member
- Sep 24, 2022
- 326
- 110
I'm sorry but this is not true. Just last month I hit position 6 and 7 for 2 x 50k traffic keywords using this method, after 6 months. Maybe it doesn't work anymore for some, but it sure work for others.
Besides I'm not sure Google is spending it resources for determining how many tiers one site have and see if this is deversified enough. There much simpler algorithms to decide on ranking.
